About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Is it Just Us?
Author: BobR    Date: 06/18/2008 12:04:09

Is it justice?... or is it just us that think the Justice Department under the Bush Administration is becoming another one of those antonymously named entities that they love to use, like the "Clean Air Initiative" or the "Healthy Forests Initiative" or "No Child Left Behind"...?

Every time we turn around there are more details about how the Justice Department was being used like a mafia enforcer. By now, the story of Don Siegelman is well known. He is the Democratic governor that was railroaded into a 30 year prison sentence. The latest twist tying the Administration to the JD is - once again - Karl Rove:
...Siegelman has long claimed that his prosecution was driven by politically motivated, Republican-appointed U.S. attorneys.
...
Now Karl Rove, the President's top political strategist, has been implicated in the controversy. A longtime Republican lawyer in Alabama swears she heard a top G.O.P. operative in the state say that Rove "had spoken with the Department of Justice" about "pursuing" Siegelman, with help from two of Alabama's U.S. attorneys.

The allegation was made by Dana Jill Simpson, a lifelong Republican and lawyer who practices in Alabama.
...
According to Simpson's statement, William Canary, a senior G.O.P. political operative and Riley adviser who was on the conference call, said "not to worry about Don Siegelman" because "'his girls' would take care of" the governor. Canary then made clear that "his girls" was a reference to his wife, Leura Canary, the U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and Alice Martin, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Alabama.

Canary reassured others on the conference call — who also included Riley's son, Rob, and Terry Butts, another Riley lawyer and former justice of the Alabama supreme court — that he had the help of a powerful pal in Washington. Canary said "not to worry — that he had already gotten it worked out with Karl and Karl had spoken with the Department of Justice and the Department of Justice was already pursuing Don Siegelman"...

Perhaps the Senate Judiciary Committee that has subpoenaed Rove to ask about the fired U.S. Attorneys can ask him about this while they're at it...

There's also the political hiring going on there. This is the case that is making "Bradley Schlozman" a household name (at least in some households):
The Justice Department is considering launching a grand jury investigation into whether one of its former leaders misled Congress about playing politics with civil rights issues, a government official said Monday.

The move amounts to a first step from an internal inquiry toward possible criminal charges in the scandal that helped force the resignation of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

At issue is whether Bradley Schlozman intentionally misled senators during a June 2007 hearing when he gave conflicting statements about his role in an election-eve filing of a voter fraud lawsuit in Missouri while serving, a year earlier, as a U.S. attorney based in Kansas City, Mo.

He also angered Democrats at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing when he admitted to boasting about hiring conservative loyalists over better-qualified lawyers in 2005 when he served as acting assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's civil rights division.

The department's inspector general has been investigating Schlozman's statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee in an internal inquiry over the last year...

Another two-fer - preferential hiring AND perjury!

But hey - if politically motivated prosecutions and hiring aren't enough, how about making deals with Republican-friendly companies to avoid prosecution?
...John Ashcroft’s entrée into the world of private enterprise was announced in January 2008. It was then we learned of the procedure that the Justice Department adopted when dealing with corporations that in a perfect world might be charged with criminal conduct but in a Bush world are permitted to avoid prosecution. Culpable corporations enter into deferred prosecution agreements pursuant to which they are not criminally indicted but instead agree to have their conduct monitored for a set period by the Justice Department or someone hired by the Justice Department. Corporations like this arrangement since they avoid trial on criminal charges and the Justice Department likes it because it is full of Bush appointees who like corporations and know that they are run by good people, many of whom paid good money to help Mr. Bush get elected and don’t deserve to have their reputations sullied by criminal charges. The price corporations pay for not being prosecuted (which is not the same thing as a bribe) is that the corporation that is not being prosecuted pays a fine and has to also pay the cost of the monitor...

Isn't this the perfect example of a protection racket? "Hey - you know: accidents happen... It would be a shame if someone got hurt. You pay us and we make sure no one gets hurt"

But who am I to criticize? David Iglesias - one of 7 attorneys fired for NOT being enforcers - describes the atmosphere at the JD in an interview on The Daily Show:



Best line: "I thought I was working with the Jedi Knights and I was working for the Sith Lords"

Apparently it's not just us...


 

251 comments (Latest Comment: 06/19/2008 03:25:10 by livingonli)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati