A civilian employee upset over a poster in a women’s restroom at Wright-Patterson about tips to avoid sexual assault posted a letter over the poster because she objected to what she described as a culture that blames victims.
Her letter got her some attention on national websites including The Huffington Post and MSNBC.
The poster, headlined: “Preventing sexual assault is everyone’s duty!” listed several tips to “avoid becoming a victim.”
“It upset me,” Jennifer D. Stephens, 32, a contract specialist said in an interview with the Dayton Daily News. “It probably angered me a little bit and I felt like it just speaks to all the wrong things.”
The poster in Building 1 listed eight tips such as try to avoid areas that are secluded, be prepared to get yourself home, don’t leave a group situation with someone you don’t know well, and socialize with people who share your values.
“I think that’s just the wrong emphasis to put for curbing sexual assault,” said Stephens, also a captain in the Ohio Army National Guard. “That immediately makes the victim feel maybe I did something wrong because I was walking to my car by myself and I did get assaulted.”
The note over the poster said, in part: “Posters like this only contribute to alienating victims by making them feel as though they will be blamed for what happened to them. This type of rhetoric only serves to promote the current rape culture that is entrenched in the military today by putting the spotlight on the victim instead of nailing the perpetrator to the wall.”
The note was removed within a day of being posted.
Base spokesman Daryl Mayer said someone posted the tips poster on the base’s Facebook page July 29, which set off a debate online.
“If someone’s got an objection (to the poster), they’re within their rights to express their objection to it,” he said.
Facebook commenters debated, among other issues, a culture of blaming the victim versus telling perpetrators of the criminal consequences of their actions.
Mayer sent a statement on how the Air Force handles sexual assault in response to a request to interview the base sexual assault response coordinator. The prevention and response program tries to prevent assaults through “focused education, compassionate advocacy, and accountability to promote respect and dignity throughout our Air Force,” the statement said in part.
“The Air Force takes a multi-faceted approach to dealing with sexual assault, which includes not only holding sexual offenders accountable and supporting victims, but also by preventing sexual assault from occurring in the first place,” the statement said. “The poster in question is hardly the sum total of our attempts to prevent sexual assault.”
In her response to the poster, Stephens said she listed advocacy groups victims of military sexual trauma could find help.
“Every survivor of military sexual assault, that has seen the poster has said the same thing,” she said. “It’s victim blaming.”
“A lot of victims don’t trust the military because the military is the one that failed them in the first place,” she said.
As a gay U.S. Marine veteran who advocated for the repeal of the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, Eric Alva has grown accustomed to being in the spotlight.
But the San Antonio native said he never expected the boos and hisses directed at him Wednesday night while he addressed the City Council on proposed changes to the anti-discrimination ordinances at a Citizens Heard hearing.
"I said that if this ordinance doesn't pass, I could be fired from a job and even thrown out of a restaurant, and people started to boo me," said Alva, 42. "I was real hurt by that. It was unbelievable."
Alva was the first American injured in the U.S. invasion of Iraq. He received a medical discharge and was awarded the Purple Heart. His prosthetic leg was visible Wednesday, under his khaki shorts. News of Alva's 3-minute speech spread via social media that night.
"To all you people that preach the word of God, shame on you, because God loves me, like the day I lay bleeding on the sands of Iraq," Alva said to the crowd. "And that's why he saved me."
Mayor Julian Castro's senior policy adviser reached out to Alva on Thursday, when he "wanted to see how I was doing, and even apologized, saying that the mayor was disappointed that I went through all that," Alva said.
While getting coffee on Friday morning, shortly after he read about statements that Councilwoman Elisa Chan made on a secret recording that bashed gay people, Alva heard from U.S. Congressman Joaquin Castro.
"The intolerant views expressed by Councilwoman Chan and the deplorable actions of those who booed a wounded warrior do not represent the sentiments of most San Antonians," the mayor's brother said in a statement. "Our city celebrates diversity and prides itself in supporting our veterans as Military City, USA."
WASHINGTON — Conservative critics are blasting the Defense Department for giving gay troops an early wedding gift: up to 10 days uncharged leave time for same-sex marriages.
Pentagon officials say it’s about fairness, not generosity. Only 13 states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriages, creating a hardship for U.S. servicemembers stationed in many parts of the world.
The policy change came last week as part of Pentagon plans to extend spousal benefits to all married couples, gay or straight, in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling in June knocking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act. For the last two years, defense officials have said that law barred them from offering any military benefits to legally married same-sex couples.
Along with housing stipends, health care coverage and separation pay, the new rules allow commanders to grant free leave time — up to 10 days for troops overseas, up to seven days for U.S.-based troops more than 100 miles from a state that recognizes same-sex marriages — for gay troops to marry.
Members of the Family Research Council, which opposed the “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal, labeled the uncharged leave policy government-endorsed “homosexual honeymoons.” Peter Sprigg, FRC’s senior fellow for policy studies, said the move goes well beyond simply recognizing same-sex couples in the ranks.
“It could well be argued that the new policy actively discriminates against opposite-sex couples, who receive no special leave for their weddings,” he wrote in a FRC news release on Thursday.
DOD officials dismissed those arguments, saying that military life presents extra difficulties for gay troops looking to get married. Travel to the states that allow same-sex marriages is a significant problem for troops stationed in places such as Texas or South Korea.
“(The uncharged leave) will provide accelerated access to the full range of benefits offered to married military couples throughout the department and help level the playing field between opposite-sex and same-sex couples seeking to be married,” said Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Pentagon spokesman.
Quote by Raine:
Jim ---
![]()
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
Jim ---
![]()
What ijit conspiracy is Mr. Ward embracing now?
Quote by wickedpam:
*sigh* have 30 min Webinar at 10 and of course have to call in since God-forbid we have the proper computer equipment at our desks![]()
Quote by Raine:Jim is pro greenwald... he believes the Brits are the police state.Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
Jim ---
![]()
What ijit conspiracy is Mr. Ward embracing now?
lots of strawman, imo.
Speaking of GG...and the Guardian: We Were Forced to Smash Our Computers While Government Goons Observed
Quote by Raine:Do you at least have headphones?Quote by wickedpam:
*sigh* have 30 min Webinar at 10 and of course have to call in since God-forbid we have the proper computer equipment at our desks![]()
Quote by Raine:
Why didn't the Guardian report about smashing computers immediately after it happened?
Gah -- this is all really shoddy crap happening here.
Quote by Scoopster:
omg Raine..3 more days!![]()
![]()
Quote by Scoopster:
I'm glad Rachel did this segment.
We may not necessarily be of the same view on this whole thing, but she has a real talent for expressing her views in a reasonable and educated manner.
Quote by wickedpam:
did I miss a JAWS reference?
Quote by TriSec:Quote by wickedpam:
did I miss a JAWS reference?
One always needs a bigger boat.
Quote by Raine:
Why didn't the Guardian report about smashing computers immediately after it happened?
Gah -- this is all really shoddy crap happening here.
Quote by Scoopster:
I'm glad Rachel did this segment.
We may not necessarily be of the same view on this whole thing, but she has a real talent for expressing her views in a reasonable and educated manner.
Who is Anonymous to determine what is or is not immoral enough to have their private information revealed? Anonymous, along with WikiLeaks, have deems themselves as arbiter of what is and is not moral. Many Americans believe that Government spying into personal emails flies in the face of the constitution. Why would we celebrate a group of people doing the same things that we decry when it comes from Government?
Do the ends justify the means? What is the end game? Let me repeat something posted earlier: "The material contains privileged information about the US government's attacks against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and Stratfor's own attempts to subvert WikiLeaks," the whistleblower website said. I don't believe I need to give the backstory regarding Mr. Assange here. I think it is fair to question motives at this point. I have long held the belief that when a group operates in anonymity we should question motives and reliability. Who is to say that you or I won't be next for writing something unsavory about WikiLeaks or anonymous?
We have a sincere lack of privacy in this nation -- and world. I believe that is a given. That said, I ask: when a group such as Anonymous steals private information and reveals it, how can we expect to see more transparency from the very groups that we desire it from? It appears that Anonymous/Wikileaks had no proof that this company was doing anything illicit aside from what appears to be a "hunch" based on the notion that it may be acting like a shadow CIA. I suspect we will see an ever bigger clampdown of information instead of more transparency.
Why do we justify this situation and criticize others for doing similar things?
Quote by Raine:
And I will say this, Miranda should not have been held under the guise of terrorism. To that I agree. Rachel is really a treasure.
Quote by TriSec:
Learned some new things about the ol' ACA yesterday.
Did you know that the "Platinum", "Gold", "Silver", and "Bronze" levels of coverage bandied about by some pundits are actually specifically defined and categorized in the legislation? It has to do with what percentage of medical expense the plans cover...and it's officially named "metallic tiers". (For example, "Platinum" covers 90% of all billed medical expenses, with the balance being out-of-pocket).
Also, there's a Minimum Credible Care requirement...meaning the law requires that a minimum of treatments and procedures be covered....but the states get to define what that is, not the feds. (Meaning in Mass, we'll cover abortions and ART, whereas in NH they may not.) It's unclear what happens where state plans overlap. (Like members living in Southern NH on a Massachusetts-based plan...who's regulations prevail?)
And I'll tip our cap another time....because Massachusetts was light-years ahead of the nation on this, and because Deval Patrick is friends with the President, we've been granted some exemptions from compliance, because "RomneyCare" has some benefits that are better than what is mandated in the ACA, so we have permission not to take a backwards step. The only state in the Union with such an exemption, I may add.
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
And I will say this, Miranda should not have been held under the guise of terrorism. To that I agree. Rachel is really a treasure.
I personally think this was not only fine, but legal as well. Miranda was knowingly acting as an agent for Poitras & Greenwald - smuggling state secrets (albeit not the UK's secrets) across an international border. There was reasonable suspicion to detain Miranda before he could transport such information.
Now the question that's been all over is what the contents of these documents was, and whether UK Schedule 7 (the law which was cited for detaining Miranda) was applicable. If it could be construed to contain anything that was related to ongoing investigations into terrorism then the material is sensitive enough where if it found its way into the wrong hands it could be used by actual terrorists to change their actions. So yes, it was legal to hold him for a while, and it was legal to seize his equipment and either destroy it or attempt to decrypt it. There clearly was not enough cause to arrest him for terrorism tho, which is why he was released (albeit after the maximum amount of time.
Earlier this morning I responded to a tweet from Rude Pundit about this same topic (and about the Guardian's destroyed hard drives). I used two examples in comparison - someone stealing plans for a nuclear/bio weapon, and the Valerie Plame outing. If Miranda had been smuggling stuff related to either of those, NO ONE would be questioning why he was detained. The former case is pretty cut & dry; The latter is much more subtle and comparable to the current discussion. Imagine Miranda's transporting a stolen list of real names, cover names & companies etc. of covert operatives themselves. If that stuff gets out PEOPLE ARE PROBABLY GONNA BE KILLED, and not just covert analysts and agents. Why isn't it reasonable that the same action be taken now, in this real case? We may have pretty good knowledge that the information Snowden stole is pretty benign, but these laws exist for those OTHER reasons and choosing not to apply them in this case, or with Snowden, or even going back to Bradley Manning or Julian Assange, is a risk that shouldn't be taken.
SPIEGEL has decided not to publish details it has seen about secret operations that could endanger the lives of NSA workers. Nor is it publishing the related internal code words. However, this does not apply to information about the general surveillance of communications.
Quote by Scoopster:
Heh.. Laura Poitras is on the byline for that Der Spiegel story. She's one of Greenwald's crew, and also an ex-pat for the same paranoid reasons as GG.
Quote by Raine:
Bob Cesca is going to be a guest on the show -- this could be interesting.
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Bob Cesca is going to be a guest on the show -- this could be interesting.
on SMS? ooh I may need to tune in for that!
Quote by Raine:
Cesca makes another good point: Miranda was a courier -- not a journalist.
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Cesca makes another good point: Miranda was a courier -- not a journalist.
Well to be fair, a courier whose plane ticket was paid for by The Guardian.
Man, I only caught the tail end of that conversation cuz I was slow to the draw!![]()
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Why do so many school districts use applications that do not permit sharing data? I have spent all morning typing data that I had entered previously elsewhere.
I am heartened, however, by the many grassroots efforts to fight for the rights, the health and safety and the opportunities our people need and deserve from the Moral Monday movement to the many non-governmental organizations that advocate for the people of our state, not the special interests. It is here that I want and need to put my energy and efforts. I am working with others on a grass-roots project to make sure everyone in the state has a proper voter ID so that no votes are denied, even though the Voter ID bill is aimed at exactly that - repressing the vote.
Quote by livingonli:
Good day, folks. Less than 3 hours until Current TV officially becomes Al-Jazeera America. The channel I was getting Al-Jazeera English on is now a simulcast of RNN on FiOS here in NY. I wasn't home but it looks like it was switched at Midnight. For our DC contingent, I was wondering what replaced AJE on your channel lineup.
Quote by TriSec:
Why is it, I wonder, that all the states I have ever considered moving to have gone nucking futs?
North Carolina - gah!
Maine - yeesh!
Ohio - augh!
Florida - aieeeeeeeee!
Only California seems OK on my short list these days.
Not that I'm actually planning on going anywhere right now.....
Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
HAH.. And to boot Al Jazeera has blocked its foreign-based english feed from being broadcast over the internet in the US, to prevent interfering with the new AJE channel that looks like it's being dropped from any carrier that hadn't already dropped Current.
Quote by TriSec:
Say Mondo, you know the type....I just walked a provider through logging on to the FCHP system. She only recently stopped writing cuneiform on papyrus with a crude brush.
Quote by Raine:
Apropos of Mondo's link yesterday to the BS generator, comes a timely article from WaPo's Gene Weingarten.
I know the exact radio ad he is talking about -- I bet Mala does too.![]()
I;m sure you all will enjoy this one!
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
Apropos of Mondo's link yesterday to the BS generator, comes a timely article from WaPo's Gene Weingarten.
I know the exact radio ad he is talking about -- I bet Mala does too.![]()
I;m sure you all will enjoy this one!
Sadly I knew what everything in the ad copy is. Yet I work here.
Quote by TriSec:
Say, DC wing....what happened to that poor kid from Natick on the Metro the other day?
Quote by livingonli:Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
HAH.. And to boot Al Jazeera has blocked its foreign-based english feed from being broadcast over the internet in the US, to prevent interfering with the new AJE channel that looks like it's being dropped from any carrier that hadn't already dropped Current.
U-Verse suddenly has a dispute with the channel on the day it launches and pulls it. Al-Jazeera America will launch on DirecTV, Dish Network, FiOS, and Comcast and most providers that carried Current. The decision to pull Al-Jazeera English was actually prompted by wanting to appease the providers that it wouldn't compete with the new network.
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
HAH.. And to boot AJE has blocked its feed from being broadcast over the internet in the US, to prevent interfering with the new AJA channel that looks like it's being dropped from any carrier that hadn't already dropped Current.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by TriSec:
Say, DC wing....what happened to that poor kid from Natick on the Metro the other day?
TOP reports that he was walking on the tracks about 2am between E Falls Church and Ballston. Not even sure how you get on the tracks between those points everything is fenced off.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
Apropos of Mondo's link yesterday to the BS generator, comes a timely article from WaPo's Gene Weingarten.
I know the exact radio ad he is talking about -- I bet Mala does too.![]()
I;m sure you all will enjoy this one!
Sadly I knew what everything in the ad copy is. Yet I work here.
that sounds like one of those WTOP ads - though nothing tops "come see monkeys riding border collies herding sheep"
Quote by Raine:Well at least we still have the Ethiopian news channel.Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
HAH.. And to boot AJE has blocked its feed from being broadcast over the internet in the US, to prevent interfering with the new AJA channel that looks like it's being dropped from any carrier that hadn't already dropped Current.![]()
Quote by livingonli:Quote by Raine:Well at least we still have the Ethiopian news channel.Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
HAH.. And to boot AJE has blocked its feed from being broadcast over the internet in the US, to prevent interfering with the new AJA channel that looks like it's being dropped from any carrier that hadn't already dropped Current.![]()
You still have France 24 and RT and I don't get those.
Quote by Raine:Not only do we get RT --Quote by livingonli:Quote by Raine:Well at least we still have the Ethiopian news channel.Quote by Scoopster:Quote by Raine:
Looks like AJE is now the Blue Ocean Network - blech --
HAH.. And to boot AJE has blocked its feed from being broadcast over the internet in the US, to prevent interfering with the new AJA channel that looks like it's being dropped from any carrier that hadn't already dropped Current.![]()
You still have France 24 and RT and I don't get those.
We get RT en Español as a separate channel on its own. Yes, you read that correct: RT en Español
MHz Networks broadcasts 12 distinct international television networks in the D.C. area including: MHz Worldview DC, NHK World TV, CCTV, RT, Al Jazeera English, CCTV Documentary, France 24, RT Espanol, Arirang TV, ETV, VTV America, And MHz Worldview national. The channels are also carried by the region’s cable systems.
Quote by livingonli:
Donde los yikes!
Quote by Raine:It is an ad that airs on WTOP and FNR.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
Apropos of Mondo's link yesterday to the BS generator, comes a timely article from WaPo's Gene Weingarten.
I know the exact radio ad he is talking about -- I bet Mala does too.![]()
I;m sure you all will enjoy this one!
Sadly I knew what everything in the ad copy is. Yet I work here.
that sounds like one of those WTOP ads - though nothing tops "come see monkeys riding border collies herding sheep"
Quote by Raine:That story is totally messed up. I'm still trying to understand how he got on the tracks -- Unless he walked straight off the platform.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by TriSec:
Say, DC wing....what happened to that poor kid from Natick on the Metro the other day?
TOP reports that he was walking on the tracks about 2am between E Falls Church and Ballston. Not even sure how you get on the tracks between those points everything is fenced off.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Raine:That story is totally messed up. I'm still trying to understand how he got on the tracks -- Unless he walked straight off the platform.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by TriSec:
Say, DC wing....what happened to that poor kid from Natick on the Metro the other day?
TOP reports that he was walking on the tracks about 2am between E Falls Church and Ballston. Not even sure how you get on the tracks between those points everything is fenced off.
that's the only way I can think of - Isn't that part also elevated right before it goes underground?
Quote by Raine:EFC is not underground, Ballston is. I think it's the last underground station going west on the orange line.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Raine:That story is totally messed up. I'm still trying to understand how he got on the tracks -- Unless he walked straight off the platform.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by TriSec:
Say, DC wing....what happened to that poor kid from Natick on the Metro the other day?
TOP reports that he was walking on the tracks about 2am between E Falls Church and Ballston. Not even sure how you get on the tracks between those points everything is fenced off.
it is sort of above ground. You have to go up from street level to get the platforms. The the viaduct goes underground.
that's the only way I can think of - Isn't that part also elevated right before it goes underground?
EFC is above ground but I think it is at ground level. (not sure about that)
ETA: I've been under the impression he died between Ballston and EFC. HE was leaving DC going west.
Quote by Raine:EFC is not underground, Ballston is. I think it's the last underground station going west on the orange line.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Raine:That story is totally messed up. I'm still trying to understand how he got on the tracks -- Unless he walked straight off the platform.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by TriSec:
Say, DC wing....what happened to that poor kid from Natick on the Metro the other day?
TOP reports that he was walking on the tracks about 2am between E Falls Church and Ballston. Not even sure how you get on the tracks between those points everything is fenced off.
that's the only way I can think of - Isn't that part also elevated right before it goes underground?
EFC is above ground but I think it is at ground level. (not sure about that)
ETA: I've been under the impression he died between Ballston and EFC. HE was leaving DC going west.
Quote by livingonli:
Ryan Dempster suspended 5 games for hitting A-Roid.
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop, I see you clitoris article and raise you a 132 pound scrotum.
Quote by Raine:NOT EVEN GOING TO CLICK.Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop, I see you clitoris article and raise you a 132 pound scrotum.
Quote by Raine:
ZDNet has data. The Data suggests that the NSA is not out of control. As a matter of fact, It isn't at all.
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:NOT EVEN GOING TO CLICK.Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop, I see you clitoris article and raise you a 132 pound scrotum.
There are no pictures of said body part.
Quote by Raine:Don't care.Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:NOT EVEN GOING TO CLICK.Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop, I see you clitoris article and raise you a 132 pound scrotum.
There are no pictures of said body part.
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
ZDNet has data. The Data suggests that the NSA is not out of control. As a matter of fact, It isn't at all.
You know, when I heard the 2700 times figure I went right to out of how many actual database transactions per year. Thanks for posting this.
Quote by Raine:The WaPo Article was good, no question about it. that said perspective of the amount of numbers is really important. This part of the story should have been explored. It goes to what I posted saturday afternoon.Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
ZDNet has data. The Data suggests that the NSA is not out of control. As a matter of fact, It isn't at all.
You know, when I heard the 2700 times figure I went right to out of how many actual database transactions per year. Thanks for posting this.
Quote by Raine:Don't care.Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:NOT EVEN GOING TO CLICK.Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop, I see you clitoris article and raise you a 132 pound scrotum.
There are no pictures of said body part.