About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask A Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 12/01/2009 11:12:52

Good Morning.

Today is our 2,449th day in Iraq, and our 2, 977th day in Afghanistan

We'll start this morning as we always do, with the lastest casualty figures from Iraq and Afghanistan, courtesy of Antiwar.com:

American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 4367
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03): 4228
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3904
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3508
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): 139

Other Coalition Troops - Iraq: 325
US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 928
Other Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 602
Contractor Employee Deaths - Iraq: 1,395
Journalists - Iraq: 335
Academics Killed - Iraq: 431


We find this morning's cost of war passing through:

$ 937, 802, 800, 000 .00



Much is going to be said over the upcoming days and months concerning the President's decisions and speech tonight at West Point. From what I've read, I don't like it. I don't like it at all. And what's with Mr. Obama taking a page from George Bush's playbook and making a "warron terra" speech in front of a captive military audience?



In any case, I will be watching this evening with interest. I don't know if I agree entirely with the vitriolic Michael Moore, but it's hard to disagree with the first paragraph of his letter to the President:


Do you really want to be the new "war president"? If you go to West Point tomorrow night (Tuesday, 8pm) and announce that you are increasing, rather than withdrawing, the troops in Afghanistan, you are the new war president. Pure and simple. And with that you will do the worst possible thing you could do -- destroy the hopes and dreams so many millions have placed in you. With just one speech tomorrow night you will turn a multitude of young people who were the backbone of your campaign into disillusioned cynics. You will teach them what they've always heard is true -- that all politicians are alike. I simply can't believe you're about to do what they say you are going to do. Please say it isn't so.



But there's even more to consider...our military is stretched so thin right now, and many soldiers are facing a third, or fourth deployment into a war zone. While that is the soldier's lot in life, what of their families? What of our nation that is suffering while many of the best and the brightest are busy killing other people instead of devoting their talents to the betterment of society?


The president's decision tonight is sure to set off a firestorm of controversy on both sides of the aisle, and perhaps a new round of attempts for some demagogues to try to score "political points", no matter what the cost. The reality remains that even with a surge of 35,000 troops, very few of us in the United States will have any direct exposure to a soldier or their families.

It is different for the people of Afghanistan. Of course, the MSM here won't give them the time of day, so we turn to the
Guardian UK for a column written by an Afghani.


After months of waiting, President Obama is about to announce the new US strategy for Afghanistan. His speech may be long awaited, but few are expecting any surprise: it seems clear he will herald a major escalation of the war. In doing so he will be making something worse than a mistake. It is a continuation of a war crime against the suffering people of my country.

I have said before that by installing warlords and drug traffickers in power in Kabul, the US and Nato have pushed us from the frying pan to the fire. Now Obama is pouring fuel on these flames, and this week's announcement of upwards of 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan will have tragic consequences.

Already this year we have seen the impact of an increase in troops occupying Afghanistan: more violence, and more civilian deaths. My people, the poor of Afghanistan who have known only war and the domination of fundamentalism, are today squashed between two enemies: the US/Nato occupation forces on one hand and warlords and the Taliban on the other.

While we want the withdrawal of one enemy, we don't believe it is a matter of choosing between two evils. There is an alternative: the democratic-minded parties and intellectuals are our hope for the future of Afghanistan.

It will not be easy, but if we have a little bit of peace we will be better able to fight our own internal enemies – Afghans know what to do with our destiny. We are not a backward people, and we are capable of fighting for democracy, human and women's rights in Afghanistan. In fact the only way these values will be achieved is if we struggle for them and win them ourselves.

After eight years of war, the situation is as bad as ever for ordinary Afghans, and women in particular. The reality is that only the drug traffickers and warlords have been helped under this corrupt and illegitimate Karzai government. Karzai's promises of reform are laughable. His own vice-president is the notorious warlord Fahim, whom Brad Adams of Human Rights Watch describes as "one of the most notorious warlords in the country, with the blood of many Afghans on his hands".

Transparency International reports that this regime is the second most corrupt in the world. The UN Development Programme reports Afghanistan is second last – 181st out of 182 countries – in terms of human development. That is why we no longer want this kind of "help" from the west.

Like many around the world, I am wondering what kind of "peace" prize can be awarded to a leader who continues the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and starts a new war in Pakistan, all while supporting Israel?

Throughout my recent tour of the US, I had the chance to meet many military families and veterans who are working to put an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They understand that it is not a case of a "bad war" and a "good war" – there is no difference, war is war.



 

16 comments (Latest Comment: 12/02/2009 02:25:50 by TriSec)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati