Quote by TriSec:
Morning, folks!
Iffin' you're not listening to the BBC's "Global News" Podcast, you're missing a treat. Their coverage of Haiti has been blowing away anything any US network is doing. It's depressing, gripping, and uplifting all at the same time.
And we've got "Katie in Haiti".![]()
Quote by Raine:
Fruck. The ONLY way that can change, now that SCOTUS ruled is for REAL campaign Finance reform laws be passed.
I am so sick of this week.
Quote by wickedpam:
the caller has a point - I know I haven't been as active as I was during the election
Quote by wickedpam:
I'm wondering - has any public group put together a list of things the public actually wants for healthcare? Then put together a rally to present it to Congress?
Quote by Raine:Quote by wickedpam:
the caller has a point - I know I haven't been as active as I was during the election
Snap to it!
I'm getting tired over here!(just kidding, Mala)
Quote by Raine:Quote by wickedpam:
I'm wondering - has any public group put together a list of things the public actually wants for healthcare? Then put together a rally to present it to Congress?
HCAN has.
the biggest problem -- as always, they didn't organize early enough.
Quote by livingonli:
Good morning everyone.
Even though the sun's been out and kittie is sleeping on the rug, I did not want to get out of bed. At least I will finally get the remainder of my desktop out of storage so I can hook up my desktop finally. It's been kind of disconnected the last few months.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Raine:Quote by wickedpam:
I'm wondering - has any public group put together a list of things the public actually wants for healthcare? Then put together a rally to present it to Congress?
HCAN has.
the biggest problem -- as always, they didn't organize early enough.
no they didn't - what is HCAN - Health Care ____ _____
Quote by Raine:
I don't know if I can listen to Thom today.
My friend at the Sunlight Foundation is reading the decision too, and has said there are actually a few good things with the SCOTUS ruling regarding transparency. I know it doesn't actually make the decision any better, but take it for what it is.
For example: P. 55. SCOTUS basically codifies transparency and disclosures role in allowing people to make informed decision. With the advent of the Internet, prompt disclosure of expenditures can provide shareholders and citizens with the information needed to hold corporations and elected officials accountable for their positions and supporters. P. 55 Citizens United V. FEC
Here read this.
I am also trying to find out if this is going to finally get rid of PACS. With them you don't really get a chance to know who is donating money.
Quote by BobR:Quote by Raine:
I don't know if I can listen to Thom today.
My friend at the Sunlight Foundation is reading the decision too, and has said there are actually a few good things with the SCOTUS ruling regarding transparency. I know it doesn't actually make the decision any better, but take it for what it is.
For example: P. 55. SCOTUS basically codifies transparency and disclosures role in allowing people to make informed decision. With the advent of the Internet, prompt disclosure of expenditures can provide shareholders and citizens with the information needed to hold corporations and elected officials accountable for their positions and supporters. P. 55 Citizens United V. FEC
Here read this.
I am also trying to find out if this is going to finally get rid of PACS. With them you don't really get a chance to know who is donating money.
So in essence - they can still donate huge sums of money, just not anonymously?
Quote by Raine:
Seriously -- when I talk about finding out how soon you get to know when a campaign donation was made--- there are already people creating phone apps for that.
imagine being able to receive those updates and wonder -- am I voting for a CEO or a servant of the people? We could capitalize on this.
And it will devastate the teabag party, because they will finally know who is funding them.
Quote by Raine:
RECONCILIATION may be happening!!!
I am getting dizzy today.
No entity created or sanctioned by the government of the United States, or by the government of any of the several States, shall be considered a person under the law; nor shall it be considered a citizen of the United States; nor shall it be granted rights enumerated for citizens under this Constitution.
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Raine:
RECONCILIATION may be happening!!!
I am getting dizzy today.
Oh, my!
This would be a good thing. Can we get a public option back now?
Something that was said on TRMS last night....let's make what we want, and FORCE the REpugs to oppose it and *actually* filibuster. Pay or Play, peoples!
Quote by Scoopster:
AMEND THE CONSTITUTION NOW!No entity created or sanctioned by the government of the United States, or by the government of any of the several States, shall be considered a person under the law; nor shall it be considered a citizen of the United States; nor shall it be granted rights enumerated for citizens under this Constitution.
Quote by Scoopster:
AMEND THE CONSTITUTION NOW!No entity created or sanctioned by the government of the United States, or by the government of any of the several States, shall be considered a person under the law; nor shall it be considered a citizen of the United States; nor shall it be granted rights enumerated for citizens under this Constitution.
Quote by livingonli:
There wasn't much left on AAR when we have the New York affiliate only airing 5 hours a day and Rachel's show was just a re-air of the MSNBC show. I wonder what 1050 in DC is going to air since that means only Randi is left.