WikiLeaks has decided to intervene in the U.S. election campaign. Help WikiLeaks run the United States over the next four years
So, for the next 34 days, beginning on 3 October 2012, we are launching a new fundraising campaign running up to Election Day, 6 November.
You can still donate to WikiLeaks using a variety of easy methods, including workarounds for Visa, MasterCard and PayPal. These donations go to fund WikiLeaks’ publishing and infrastructure costs and our legal costs to fight the financial blockade.
Today, Wednesday 10th October, WikiLeaks begins releasing over 200,000 Global Intelligence Files (GI Files) relating to the U.S. presidential elections. Each week day we will release thousands of emails referring to Obama, Biden, Romney and the Republican and Democratic parties. Today we will publish over 13,734 emails referring to republican(s), Romney, RNC and/or GOP, ranging from 3rd January 2011 to 19th December 2011.
The GI Files total over five million emails from the U.S. private intelligence firm Stratfor. Stratfor is a secretive multi-national private intelligence firm, providing services to large corporations, and government agencies. Despite providing the U.S. government with "global intelligence" services there is no public oversight of Stratfor.
[..]
Through this release WikiLeaks aims to inform the U.S. electorate in an unbiased way through the release of source documents from one of the most oddly influential companies in the U.S. today. We call upon all people around the world to search the emails and publicise their findings using the hashtag #wlfindGI.
Whoever you elect into power, keep them accountable by supporting WikiLeaks - vote with your wallet, vote WikiLeaks.
Who is Anonymous to determine what is or is not immoral enough to have their private information revealed? Anonymous, along with WikiLeaks, have deems themselves as arbiter of what is and is not moral. Many Americans believe that Government spying into personal emails flies in the face of the constitution. Why would we celebrate a group of people doing the same things that we decry when it comes from Government? (snip)
We have a sincere lack of privacy in this nation -- and world. I believe that is a given. That said, I ask: when a group such as Anonymous steals private information and reveals it, how can we expect to see more transparency from the very groups that we desire it from? It appears that Anonymous/Wikileaks had no proof that this company was doing anything illicit aside from what appears to be a "hunch" based on the notion that it may be acting like a shadow CIA. I suspect we will see an ever bigger clampdown of information instead of more transparency.
WikiLeaks may espouse ideals of information freedom. But lately, it seems that information freedom isn't free.
[..]
Even without making a donation, the pop-up is hardly insurmountable–disabling javascript turns it off. And after a few minutes of butting my head up against the video message with various browsers, the block disappeared and didn’t show up again, implying that it may be a technical issue rather than a hard-sell tactic.
But that hardly appeases WikiLeaks’ hacker fans. On twitter, accounts related to Anonymous exploded with vitriol, calling the tactic “moneywhoring” and “pathetic.”
“WE DO NOT MAKE ANY MONEY WITH LEAKS. WE DESPISE ANYONE WHO DOES. over and out,” wrote AnonymousIRC, a popular mouthpiece for the hacker movement.
“How totally fucking arrogant. You know what, taking it down isn’t enough. You remove it and apologize or fucking EXPECT US,” wrote the account for the People’s Liberation Front, (PLF) an Anonymous sub-group, using the hackers’ usual threat for an impending attack.
The hackers’ outrage was compounded by the fact that the files WikiLeaks had advertised earlier in the day were allegedly stolen by Jeremy Hammond, an Anonymous member arrested and charged in March with an attack on Stratfor. “Good Anons are in PRISON right now (#FREEJeremyHammond) & indicted for the Stratfor Leak,” wrote the PLF. “You risk WAR with Anonymous. Fix it.”
Update: WikiLeaks has confirmed that the pop-up is intentional, but pointed out via Twitter that visitors can skirt the paywall by sharing a link to the donation pop-up instead of paying, or simply waiting several minutes, as I found. “A tweet, share, wait or donate campaign is not a ‘paywall,’” the group wrote, helpfully adding a link to its merchandise page.
[..]
Update: As of around midnight. WikiLeaks seems to have dropped the pop-up without comment, though it continued to appear for some users for several hours. AnonymousIRC has declared their support for the group again.
Do the ends justify the means? What is the end game? Let me repeat something posted earlier: "The material contains privileged information about the US government's attacks against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks and Stratfor's own attempts to subvert WikiLeaks," the whistleblower website said. I don't believe I need to give the backstory regarding Mr. Assange here. I think it is fair to question motives at this point. I have long held the belief that when a group operates in anonymity we should question motives and reliability. Who is to say that you or I won't be next for writing something unsavory about WikiLeaks or anonymous?
Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Quote by TriSec:
I didn't think this was about Ryan's unit tonight...
Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Quote by BobR:Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote by Mondobubba:
That was one flat, stiff kitteh corpse. Do you know how hard it is wrap something that is more or less a triangle?
Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Quote by TriSec:
How interesting....National has sent out a survey through "Voice of the Scout" asking for some feedback.
The one valid question was "What would you do to improve scouting?"
Well, I ripped them a new one over our membership policy.
I've had my honour and integrity questioned simply by wearing the uniform.
I've had a bona-fide shouting match with a prospective parent over the policy while in full uniform (not my proudest moment).
I considered leaving the program over this summer, but am better now after some things happened at the start of the season.
You all know I've been a scout since I was 8 years old. This is killing me. My whole scouting career has been prep for Javi's run at Eagle; to have this crisis when he's at the starting line has been difficult, to say the least.
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Mondobubba:
That was one flat, stiff kitteh corpse. Do you know how hard it is wrap something that is more or less a triangle?
Oh, dear.
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Mondobubba:
That was one flat, stiff kitteh corpse. Do you know how hard it is wrap something that is more or less a triangle?
Oh, dear.
Quote by BobR:
Regardless of your feelings for national policy and certain local douchebags, this is still a fantastic learning experience for Javi that will prepare him well for life.
Quote by wickedpam:
Has anyone noticed the lack of Obama signage around?
Quote by TriSec:Quote by wickedpam:
Has anyone noticed the lack of Obama signage around?
Yes...I see a few bumper stickers around, but that's it. I work in Central Mass (Brown territory) and there's tons of his signs around, but no Romney signs either.
Quote by TriSec:Quote by wickedpam:
Has anyone noticed the lack of Obama signage around?
Yes...I see a few bumper stickers around, but that's it. I work in Central Mass (Brown territory) and there's tons of his signs around, but no Romney signs either.
Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Quote by Raine:
Blog is posted. Please take a read?
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Raine:
Blog is posted. Please take a read?
I did - I am disturbed by this.
Quote by Mondobubba:
Sorry, you mentioned Julian Assange and wikileaks. I zoned out.
Quote by Raine:Well I;m sorry this wasn't your cup of tea...Quote by Mondobubba:
Sorry, you mentioned Julian Assange and wikileaks. I zoned out.
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:Well I;m sorry this wasn't your cup of tea...Quote by Mondobubba:
Sorry, you mentioned Julian Assange and wikileaks. I zoned out.
JOKINGWith a point. At this juncture that is how most people react to Asange/Wikileaks/etc. I do agree
![]()
Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Quote by trojanrabbit:
The so-called "sports" morning show was guffawing over Gerry (Forehead) Callahan's "joke" that the only people who saw the A's win last night were Warren supporters because they don't work.
Quote by TriSec:
Does lunch still await us?
It awaits us indeed!
Quote by Will in Chicago:Quote by Mondobubba:
For those of you who missed it, Missie died yesterday. WORST.MONTH.EVER!![]()
Mondo, hang in there. I am keeping you in my thoughts and prayers.
In something I mentioned last night, my sister-in-law Holly had an appointment yesterday and doctors believe that not enough blood is reaching the outer walls of her heart. So, tomorrow she has an angiogram and probably surgery. Please keep her in your thoughts and prayers. (My grandniece, Emily Rose, is still in the hospital recovering from a respiratory infection. I hope that she will be coming home soon.)
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Raine, your post makes me ask a question posed in Latin by the poet Juvenal:Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
This is often translated into English as "Who will guard the guards themselves?" or "Who watches the watchmen? As a former reporter, who realizes that leaked information can have a legitimate place in the realm of public discourse (the Pentagon Papers and Watergate come to mind as iconic examples of the usefulness of such information), I have some concerns over the actions of WikiLeaks and Anonymous.
While WikiLeaks and Anonymous have revealed several important issues, such as the behavior of some of our troops in Iraq, I worry about a lack of oversight. I am leery of any organization inserting itself into the American political system when there is no way to track who is involved and what is their agenda. At least with Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, people who were worried about their articles could contact them or their editors. Whom do people talk to with these two organizations. This also is one of my concerns about Citizens United. Lack of transparency and the theft of information are major concerns of mine. I think it is legitimate to ask the people involved in WikiLeaks, Anonymous and the Citizens United groups who they are and to clearly state their goals and beliefs.
In many newspapers, there is an omsbudsman who is supposed to look at the practices of an organization. I think that WikiLeaks and Anonymous do need greater transparency. I also have to wonder about the wisdom of stealing information from others, as it may set up a never ending cycle. (I do respect whistle blowers and we need more of them. However, most whistle blowers try to work within a system to change it ) I think that the people behind WikiLeaks and Anonymous may well have good intentions, wishing to expose abuses that they see, but the road to Hell is said to be paved with good intentions.
Quote by wickedpam:
I'm kinda disappointed I won't get to see the debate tonight - holiday kickoff meeting instead - oh well.
Quote by Raine:Willm this is what I have been concerned with when it comes to WikiLeaks for a long time. You mentioned the pentagon papers, and I specifically spoke of this very issue almost 2 years ago. I remember at the time, It was not a popular position to take, but in light of what is happening now, I'm glad I trusted my instincts to write the things I have written.Quote by Will in Chicago:
Raine, your post makes me ask a question posed in Latin by the poet Juvenal:Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
This is often translated into English as "Who will guard the guards themselves?" or "Who watches the watchmen? As a former reporter, who realizes that leaked information can have a legitimate place in the realm of public discourse (the Pentagon Papers and Watergate come to mind as iconic examples of the usefulness of such information), I have some concerns over the actions of WikiLeaks and Anonymous.
While WikiLeaks and Anonymous have revealed several important issues, such as the behavior of some of our troops in Iraq, I worry about a lack of oversight. I am leery of any organization inserting itself into the American political system when there is no way to track who is involved and what is their agenda. At least with Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, people who were worried about their articles could contact them or their editors. Whom do people talk to with these two organizations. This also is one of my concerns about Citizens United. Lack of transparency and the theft of information are major concerns of mine. I think it is legitimate to ask the people involved in WikiLeaks, Anonymous and the Citizens United groups who they are and to clearly state their goals and beliefs.
In many newspapers, there is an omsbudsman who is supposed to look at the practices of an organization. I think that WikiLeaks and Anonymous do need greater transparency. I also have to wonder about the wisdom of stealing information from others, as it may set up a never ending cycle. (I do respect whistle blowers and we need more of them. However, most whistle blowers try to work within a system to change it ) I think that the people behind WikiLeaks and Anonymous may well have good intentions, wishing to expose abuses that they see, but the road to Hell is said to be paved with good intentions.
Quote by TriSec:
I grow more alarmed with Nate's numbers...
Quote by TriSec:
This is not the first time Framingham pharmacy killed someone...
Raine? Upstate NY - patient by the name of Koch.
(can't copy the article - Macrohard doesn't like CBS Boston.)
Quote by wickedpam:
I'm kinda disappointed I won't get to see the debate tonight - holiday kickoff meeting instead - oh well.
Quote by Scoopster:
Well now this is an interesting development.. I'm getting my drivers' license back! Not 100% sure if I can swing the fees to do it this month, but I'll DEFINITELY have it done in time for Thanksgiving!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote by Raine:It's not starting until 9 pm -- that bites that you'll be getting home so late.Quote by wickedpam:
I'm kinda disappointed I won't get to see the debate tonight - holiday kickoff meeting instead - oh well.![]()
Quote by Scoopster:
Ewwww.. he looks like Fred Durst.
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Scoopster:
Well now this is an interesting development.. I'm getting my drivers' license back! Not 100% sure if I can swing the fees to do it this month, but I'll DEFINITELY have it done in time for Thanksgiving!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Scoop, were you a bad boy?![]()
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Ewwww.. he looks like Fred Durst.
a toothless Fred Durst
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Ewwww.. he looks like Fred Durst.
a toothless Fred Durst
And tatless Fred Durst at that. (Slowly I turned...etc. I dislike Limp Bizkit even more than I dislike Skynnyrd, man).
Quote by livingonli:Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Ewwww.. he looks like Fred Durst.
a toothless Fred Durst
And tatless Fred Durst at that. (Slowly I turned...etc. I dislike Limp Bizkit even more than I dislike Skynnyrd, man).
If you see the footage of him at Woodstock '99, he shows himself to be a total dick and many of the rapes that happened at Woodstock '99 may have happened during his performance.
Quote by BobR:
Dat Ryan iz prezidenchul material, yo...
Quote by Raine:
This is a totally flucked up story. In the desire to embarass the President and the State Department, the GOP blew the CIA's cover -- all on C-span
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
This is a totally flucked up story. In the desire to embarass the President and the State Department, the GOP blew the CIA's cover -- all on C-span
Tri, see this is the stuff that is going make Douchebag's numbers drop.
Quote by Scoopster:
GODDAMNIT!! The fucking DMV told me I HAVE TO RE-TEST FOR A LICENSE. Not because it's been a decade since I had one, not because I'm transferring it from out-of-state.. "because you got a state issued ID card instead of a license"
Excuse me whilst I rage about the overburden of government regulation.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote by Raine:
This is a totally flucked up story. In the desire to embarass the President and the State Department, the GOP blew the CIA's cover -- all on C-span
Quote by trojanrabbit:Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by Raine:
This is a totally flucked up story. In the desire to embarass the President and the State Department, the GOP blew the CIA's cover -- all on C-span
Tri, see this is the stuff that is going make Douchebag's numbers drop.
Not to the typical American that believes the Ambassador was dragged through the streets and raped.
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Raine:
This is a totally flucked up story. In the desire to embarass the President and the State Department, the GOP blew the CIA's cover -- all on C-span
So I'm guessing there were more than two witnesses as specified in the Constitution. Treason, anyone?
Quote by Raine:
This is Mitt Romney, folks.
Tried to make a woman not get a lifesaving Abortion and then tried to force a family friend to give her very white bastard son up for adoption -- to the Mormon church, of course -- but figured it was fine for her to keep her mulatta baby girl..
What a shitty crappyman.thing.
Quote by TriSec:
This is why Mormonism is my last prejudice.
When I hear someone is a Mormon, I think Idiot, Tool, or worse. This story only reinforces my opinion.
Quote by Raine:HERE is the entire original article. I am sick to my stomach.Quote by Raine:
This is Mitt Romney, folks.
Tried to make a woman not get a lifesaving Abortion and then tried to force a family friend to give her very white bastard son up for adoption -- to the Mormon church, of course -- but figured it was fine for her to keep her mulatta baby girl..
What a shitty crappyman.thing.
According to Hayes, Romney called her directly in 1994 when the story was about to break and asked her if she'd be willing to talk. Her son was about 10 at the time. She says that they spoke for about "an hour and a half." Romney, she said, "never got her name right once" in the entire conversation.
Earlier this year, Dushku's daughter, the actress Eliza Dushku (of television's Buffy the Vampire Slayer fame), got cornered at a benefit dinner by a reporter for New York Magazine and was queried about her family relationship with the Romneys.
"I mean, he went from being my first crush at 6 years old," Eliza Dushku recalled, "and then when I was old enough to hear what was coming out of his mouth, it was over. I'm sure he's a nice guy. I knew him to be a nice person, to those around him. He had five sons that I knew, that my brothers would play with growing up, and they were kind to others. But what they stand for I don't find to be tolerant or just."
The resulting headline declared, of course, "Eliza Dushku Recalls Her Childhood Crush on Mitt Romney"—and her more critical position about tolerance and justice was buried beneath the focus on the "crush."
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Romney seems to have minimal social skills with those outside of his social class. However, I wonder if the stories we are discussing here will reach the larger public.
Today would have been my Dad's 78th birthday. So, I am a bit down today.
The Boy Scout who was refused an Eagle Medal because he dared to come out to friends and family as gay will be getting the awards — but not from the antigay organization.
The New York Daily News reports that Dr. Andrew Zerbinopolous saw the story of 17-year-old Ryan Andresen and sent him his Eagle Medal.
“If I can make him feel like he has some support out there, it’s worth it to me to send him a piece of metal,†said Zerbinopolous, according to First Coast News.
Quote by Raine:
This is a Story for TriSecThe Boy Scout who was refused an Eagle Medal because he dared to come out to friends and family as gay will be getting the awards — but not from the antigay organization.
The New York Daily News reports that Dr. Andrew Zerbinopolous saw the story of 17-year-old Ryan Andresen and sent him his Eagle Medal.
“If I can make him feel like he has some support out there, it’s worth it to me to send him a piece of metal,†said Zerbinopolous, according to First Coast News.
Quote by Raine:IF you can, REad the original article -- There is far more information there. Ms. Duchko is a very surprising woman in the LDS church. She actually reminds me of the nuns on the bus.Quote by TriSec:
This is why Mormonism is my last prejudice.
When I hear someone is a Mormon, I think Idiot, Tool, or worse. This story only reinforces my opinion.
Quote by Raine:Oh, Will. I'm sorry.Quote by Will in Chicago:
Romney seems to have minimal social skills with those outside of his social class. However, I wonder if the stories we are discussing here will reach the larger public.
Today would have been my Dad's 78th birthday. So, I am a bit down today.
I believe that if stories like this are put out on Social MEdia they will reach a larger audience. At least people are writing them.![]()
Quote by Raine:And I'm not sure if you need a new Dentist, Mondo -- But Dr. Zerbinopolous lives in your city!Quote by Raine:
This is a Story for TriSecThe Boy Scout who was refused an Eagle Medal because he dared to come out to friends and family as gay will be getting the awards — but not from the antigay organization.
The New York Daily News reports that Dr. Andrew Zerbinopolous saw the story of 17-year-old Ryan Andresen and sent him his Eagle Medal.
“If I can make him feel like he has some support out there, it’s worth it to me to send him a piece of metal,†said Zerbinopolous, according to First Coast News.
Quote by Will in Chicago:Quote by Raine:Oh, Will. I'm sorry.Quote by Will in Chicago:
Romney seems to have minimal social skills with those outside of his social class. However, I wonder if the stories we are discussing here will reach the larger public.
Today would have been my Dad's 78th birthday. So, I am a bit down today.
I believe that if stories like this are put out on Social MEdia they will reach a larger audience. At least people are writing them.![]()
It does help that this is shared on social media. However, I have long ago concluded that some people will not care what facts we present as it counters their world view.
I am going to try to relax before the debate. With my sister-in-law's health problems, my Dad's birthday, and the anniversary of my dog's death tomorrow, I am a bit worn out.
New Polls Suggest Democratic Freakout May Be Premature
Benjy Sarlin October 11, 2012, 11:48 AM
While Mitt Romney clearly did some damage in the debate, a raft of swing state polls from major news outlets Thursday indicate President Obama may have put a floor on his drop.
Nervous Democrats told TPM earlier in the week that they were eagerly anticipating state results from the major national pollsters before deciding whether Romney had taken the lead in the race outright — suggesting a full-fledged freakout on the left could start as early as today.
While there’s been an array of state and national numbers over the last few days, two sets of polls from NBC/WSJ/Marist and CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac represent some of the first results from top outlets that polling analysts tend to lend the most credibility. And the numbers, while improved for Romney, still show Obama with an advantage in key states.
Most important: Ohio, a likely must-win for Romney where Obama has held a solid lead in recent weeks. NBC/WSJ pegs the race at 51-45 for Obama, a 2-point bounce for Romney since their last poll with the president’s own support remaining steady. It’s the second post-debate poll of Ohio from a major news organization to show Obama breaking the 50 percent barrier — CNN put him up 51-47.
Quote by Raine:
I'm watching HArdball... one kid has a sign that says *Joe Biden hates Puppies* and I couldn't help but laugh...
But even better, another kid has a sign that says:Chris Matthews listens to Nickleback
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote by Raine:
I'm watching HArdball... one kid has a sign that says *Joe Biden hates Puppies* and I couldn't help but laugh...
But even better, another kid has a sign that says:Chris Matthews listens to Nickleback
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote by Mondobubba:
I can't go home and pet a kitteh!![]()
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Raine, thanks for the kind words.
I am going to try to relax before the debate. I expect a good performance from Joe Biden.
Talking Points Memo has some good news for Democrats worried about the polls.New Polls Suggest Democratic Freakout May Be Premature
Benjy Sarlin October 11, 2012, 11:48 AM
While Mitt Romney clearly did some damage in the debate, a raft of swing state polls from major news outlets Thursday indicate President Obama may have put a floor on his drop.
Nervous Democrats told TPM earlier in the week that they were eagerly anticipating state results from the major national pollsters before deciding whether Romney had taken the lead in the race outright — suggesting a full-fledged freakout on the left could start as early as today.
While there’s been an array of state and national numbers over the last few days, two sets of polls from NBC/WSJ/Marist and CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac represent some of the first results from top outlets that polling analysts tend to lend the most credibility. And the numbers, while improved for Romney, still show Obama with an advantage in key states.
Most important: Ohio, a likely must-win for Romney where Obama has held a solid lead in recent weeks. NBC/WSJ pegs the race at 51-45 for Obama, a 2-point bounce for Romney since their last poll with the president’s own support remaining steady. It’s the second post-debate poll of Ohio from a major news organization to show Obama breaking the 50 percent barrier — CNN put him up 51-47.
Quote by livingonli:Quote by Mondobubba:
I can't go home and pet a kitteh!![]()
![]()
I'm going to miss the cat in my house when I move since she's going with my roomie to the Carolinas. Actually, she got a little anxious when I was about to leave today. My roomie is looking at places in North Carolina this week so I am taking care of the cat and she's been around me most of the time when I am home.
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Biden is responding to Ryan and is responding to him well.
Quote by Raine:
With all Due respect Martha Radditz is interjecting herself too much into this is a #VPDebate. This is a debate, not an interview.
Quote by BobR:
FIRETRUCK!!!
Quote by Raine:
Joe looks RIGHT at the CAmera to the American People.
Ryan has not done that once.
Oh, and Watch ryan get redder and redder...
Quote by Raine:
This is a Story for TriSec
Quote by TriSec:Quote by Raine:
This is a Story for TriSec
The hell of it is, that Scout could transfer to any one of the 38 councils nationwide with non-discrimination policies and get his award today.
10:31 pm
Ryan's budget guts social programs for lower-income Americans
Share
Biden just brought up the fact that Ryan’s budget really hurts low-income people. Sixty two percent of the cuts are from programs that benefit low-income people.
10:27 pm
Catholic leaders have denounced Ryan's policies
Share
Ryan’s policies have been widely criticized by Catholic scholars, nuns, and bishops. The Nuns on the Bus, who have traveled around the country to advocate for economic justice, have denounced Ryan’s budget as “immoral and unjustifiable†because it “will be putting the burden on the poor.â€
10:26 pm
Ryan says 'unelected judges' should not set our abortion policy
Share
But he wants five unelected justices to set our health care policy. And he gave a speech last year suggesting that unelected judges should impose “limited government, low taxes, [and] sound money†upon the country, regardless of what our elected officials enact. The Constitution says nothing about judges setting economy policy — it say that choice belongs to the people’s elected representatives.
10:23 pm
Ryan co-sponsored 'personhood' amendment
Share
While Joe Biden said the Catholic Church believes that life begins at conception, the Vice President said he would not impose that value on anyone else. But Ryan co-sponsored a radical “personhood†amendment that endows a fertilized egg with “all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood.†This type of legislation would outlaw abortion, invitro fertilization, and some forms of contraception.
10:22 pm
Something you should know about Ryan's record on abortion
Share
Before Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) infamously said that women cannot get pregnant from “legitimate rape,†Ryan worked with him to try to narrow the definition of rape. Ryan has teamed up with Akin to co-sponsor eight anti-choice bills to limit women’s reproductive freedom:
Quote by Scoopster:
Looks like you guys had one helluva shindig last night! I ended up kinda passing out early while watching the Yanks-O's game and missed the whole debate!![]()
Anyways, I just got a bit of a brain flash for a bloggie.. and I assure you it's gonna be a good one.