What if we were to find out that John McCain called for arming the very people that may have killed Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, U.S. Foreign Service, Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods? When will Senator John McCain appear before the Senate to tell us what he may know? I'm just asking questions here. At a certain point, someone needs to ask specifically why John McCain has been SO vocal about the events in Benghazi.
Perhaps John McCain is hoping that these events were from Pro-Qaddafi factions? So far, it doesn't appear to be the case.
I propose this: It's time John McCain be brought forward to answer questions about his trips to Syria and Libya - under oath - in front of the Senate and his peers. Did he meet with rebels? Was he part of an arms deal? Did he play a part in the murder of 4 Americans in Benghazi on 9/11/2012? Could this be why he so vocal about that day?
Is he trying to deflect from his responsibility for what happened?
Quote by Raine:
Good morning! Mala, you remember the ISIS TV show, right?
Quote by Scoopster:
Mornin' all..
So yeah.. I wonder if Boehner is gonna sue his own party's members for voting for this amendment that blocks enforcement of laws in DC?
Also, hey it's legal in DC!
Gray’s office also warned that as the House Republican amendment was drafted, the city needs to determine if the action could force the city to shut down its entire medical marijuana program, which started last year. Marijuana advocates, meanwhile, were pushing a theory that the House Republicans’ actions could leave the city with no enforceable marijuana law, effectively legalizing possession. The D.C. Attorney General’s Office said it was reviewing that possibility and other potential fallout from the House’s vote.
Quote by TriSec:
Wasn't Isis a tier-2 superhero, too?
Quote by Raine:
Good morning! Mala, you remember the ISIS TV show, right?
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.
Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.
We are a bit stumped.
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.
Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.
We are a bit stumped.
Quote by Raine:I kinda liked Tomb RaiderQuote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.
Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.
We are a bit stumped.
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.
Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.
We are a bit stumped.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.
Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.
We are a bit stumped.
I thought Silent Hill was pretty good for what it was - very creepy
Quote by TriSec:
Non-sequitir: do those radioactive, unrefrigerated mini-moo creamers always taste sour, or is it me?
Quote by Scoopster:
SCOTUS time folks..
First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
SCOTUS time folks..
First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.
So they are making more gridlock. I suspected Congress will now never go on recess to stop presidents from making appointments.
I mean unless this only applies to the black guy.
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
SCOTUS time folks..
First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.
So they are making more gridlock. I suspected Congress will now never go on recess to stop presidents from making appointments.
I mean unless this only applies to the black guy.
What was I thinking!
Duh! Of course it only applies to President Black Guy!
Quote by Mondobubba:
Tri, that stuff is the work of the Devil. Why are you using it?
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
Quote by wickedpam:
With these two rules I"m not holding out hope for ANYTHING anymore.
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by wickedpam:
With these two rules I"m not holding out hope for ANYTHING anymore.
Yesterday's ruling on cellphone privacy.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.
Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.
Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
Quote by Raine:I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.
Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.
Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
Quote by Raine:I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.
Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.
Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
Quote by BobR:Quote by Raine:I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.
Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.
Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
They didn't intimidate me - they pissed me off. I'd drive by them slowly and flip them a big fat bird and make sure they saw it.
Quote by Raine:
More Vileness.
Quote by Scoopster:
Welp.. Suarez (the Uruguayan player who got all bitey) just got slapped down hard. Suspended for 9 international matches, and he faces a hearing which could lead to another 4 month suspension from ALL FIFA MATCH PLAY and a fine.
Quote by TriSec:
So, 'twas two years ago this afternoon I presented at MAH with a hot appendix. I still marvel sometimes that I'm still around.
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Think Progress has an analysis of the buffer zone decision.
[
The Supreme Court Just Made It Harder For Women To Exercise Their Right To Choose