About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Thursday
Author: Raine    Date: 06/26/2014 13:06:44

Shit's all gone to hell. Now who wants to come party on Saturday?

So, I leave you with the real problem, John McCain thought he was going to meet this ISIS when he went to Syria last year…



Instead, he got these guys and he didn't even get a Tshirt!

http://www.tpnn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ISIS-McCain-ad.jpg


All joking aside, I would likes to remind you of something I wrote May of 2013. A Monster in our midst. In particular, there was this picture I posted with that entry…

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/5/29/23/enhanced-buzz-10513-1369883328-6.jpg


Go back and read it. I had questions; I will post them again:
What if we were to find out that John McCain called for arming the very people that may have killed Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, U.S. Foreign Service, Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods? When will Senator John McCain appear before the Senate to tell us what he may know? I'm just asking questions here. At a certain point, someone needs to ask specifically why John McCain has been SO vocal about the events in Benghazi.

Perhaps John McCain is hoping that these events were from Pro-Qaddafi factions? So far, it doesn't appear to be the case.

I propose this: It's time John McCain be brought forward to answer questions about his trips to Syria and Libya - under oath - in front of the Senate and his peers. Did he meet with rebels? Was he part of an arms deal? Did he play a part in the murder of 4 Americans in Benghazi on 9/11/2012? Could this be why he so vocal about that day?

Is he trying to deflect from his responsibility for what happened?

There is blood on John McCain's hands. From Libya, to Syria and now Iraq, this is what this man has allowed to happen. He encouraged this. He should be censured at the very least. We knew it a year ago and we are seeing blowback from him today. He's been very quiet this week, I have to believe he knows the shit he's stepped in.
 

93 comments (Latest Comment: 06/27/2014 00:32:25 by Raine)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 13:30:00
Morning :hug:



Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 13:41:43
Good morning! Mala, you remember the ISIS TV show, right?

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 13:41:58
Moring all. How are we today? :paints face red white and blue, dons red white and blue rainbow wig: Ready for USA vs Germany?

Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 13:43:36
V.

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 13:44:32
Quote by Raine:
Good morning! Mala, you remember the ISIS TV show, right?



I do, I thank you for that. Of course when I hear ISIS I think this:

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110421211523/archer/images/f/fd/ISIS_Logo.jpg


And this:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-c1TVWSkayQs/TwoNeVZ4arI/AAAAAAAAEQ8/Jd1mgf83TFI/s1600/A3.JPG


Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 13:45:27
I said it in February os 2013 as well: The man is a danger to society.

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 13:45:55
Comment by TriSec on 06/26/2014 13:55:45
Wasn't Isis a tier-2 superhero, too?

Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 13:56:00
I was reading about this in the Post today. They really have no idea how to govern, huh?

Idiots. All DC wanted to do was make it a simple fine, and they went ahead and legalized it?

Right now, tho the policy is unclear.
Gray’s office also warned that as the House Republican amendment was drafted, the city needs to determine if the action could force the city to shut down its entire medical marijuana program, which started last year. Marijuana advocates, meanwhile, were pushing a theory that the House Republicans’ actions could leave the city with no enforceable marijuana law, effectively legalizing possession. The D.C. Attorney General’s Office said it was reviewing that possibility and other potential fallout from the House’s vote.





Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 13:56:46
Quote by TriSec:
Wasn't Isis a tier-2 superhero, too?
Isis was not tier two. She actually Predated Wonder woman on TV.


Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 13:59:18
Quote by Raine:
Good morning! Mala, you remember the ISIS TV show, right?



Yep, it was a spin off of Shazam I think

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 14:02:22
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.

Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.

We are a bit stumped.

Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 14:05:37
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.

Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.

We are a bit stumped.
I kinda liked Tomb Raider


Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:06:15
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.

Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.

We are a bit stumped.


I thought Silent Hill was pretty good for what it was - very creepy


Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:06:36
Quote by Raine:
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.

Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.

We are a bit stumped.
I kinda liked Tomb Raider



I liked Tomb Raider too

Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 14:07:01
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.

Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.

We are a bit stumped.

Would it be stretching to say Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within?

Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 14:07:36
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Mondobubba:
Scoop & Mala I need you input on a discussion we are having at work today.

Can either of of you think of good adaptation of video game to a movie? Successful is not the same as good. "Resident Evil" has been successful.

We are a bit stumped.


I thought Silent Hill was pretty good for what it was - very creepy

Oooh yeah. I thought they did an okay job with that one.

Comment by TriSec on 06/26/2014 14:11:36
Non-sequitir: do those radioactive, unrefrigerated mini-moo creamers always taste sour, or is it me?

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 14:16:35
Quote by TriSec:
Non-sequitir: do those radioactive, unrefrigerated mini-moo creamers always taste sour, or is it me?



Tri, that stuff is the work of the Devil. Why are you using it?

Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 14:23:27
SCOTUS time folks..

First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.

Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:29:36
Quote by Scoopster:
SCOTUS time folks..

First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.


So they are making more gridlock. I suspected Congress will now never go on recess to stop presidents from making appointments.

I mean unless this only applies to the black guy.


Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 14:30:23
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Scoopster:
SCOTUS time folks..

First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.


So they are making more gridlock. I suspected Congress will now never go on recess to stop presidents from making appointments.

I mean unless this only applies to the black guy.



Duh! Of course it only applies to President Black Guy!


Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:31:20
Quote by Mondobubba:
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Scoopster:
SCOTUS time folks..

First case in is the Recess Appointments one - Unanimous against the appointments,
but the opinion is very narrow stating that the President can make appointments during normal recess between sessions of Congress but not during the 3-day pro forma BS. A concurrence from the four mouthbreathers being preached from the bench by Scalia.


So they are making more gridlock. I suspected Congress will now never go on recess to stop presidents from making appointments.

I mean unless this only applies to the black guy.



What was I thinking!

Duh! Of course it only applies to President Black Guy!



Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:35:57
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 14:36:05
Interesting point made.. "Although the President can adjourn the Congress if the two houses of Congress cannot agree when to adjourn, (the SCOTUSBlog blog host is) not aware of that power ever being exercised, so it's untested."

Comment by TriSec on 06/26/2014 14:38:49
Quote by Mondobubba:


Tri, that stuff is the work of the Devil. Why are you using it?


Oh, I quit. I've been drinking black coffee for a while. I see the effluent every morning in the kitchen, tho.


Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 14:44:16
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.
Christ almighty.

Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:44:55
With these two rules I"m not holding out hope for ANYTHING anymore.

Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 14:47:46
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 14:49:57
Quote by wickedpam:
With these two rules I"m not holding out hope for ANYTHING anymore.



Yesterday's ruling on cellphone privacy.


Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 14:51:33
HAve I mentioned that Nancy Grace is a vile human being lately?

Let me correct that oversight.

Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:56:22
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.



Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.

Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.


Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 14:57:30
Quote by Mondobubba:
Quote by wickedpam:
With these two rules I"m not holding out hope for ANYTHING anymore.



Yesterday's ruling on cellphone privacy.



that, in my book, was a "give me" - we have right to be secure in our "papers" these days papers are digital

Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 14:58:28
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.



Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.

Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.

Comment by BobR on 06/26/2014 15:01:07
Quote by Raine:
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.



Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.

Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.

They didn't intimidate me - they pissed me off. I'd drive by them slowly and flip them a big fat bird and make sure they saw it.

Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 15:01:52
Quote by Raine:
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.



Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.

Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.

Hey I'm with ya.. these people are rude fucking assholes. I'm just relaying how the opinion reads!

Comment by Will in Chicago on 06/26/2014 15:06:27
Good morning, bloggers!!! I I hope that everyone is well.

I am disturbed by the Supreme Court rulings, and I have to ask if the Supreme Court is undermining its status with decisions like those issued today. I fear that we will see even more violence at clinics.

As for McCain, the man is all about making a spectacle about himself. If a Democrat had done this during the Bush administration, Faux Mews would call for his or her head on a silver platter.

Comment by wickedpam on 06/26/2014 15:26:20
Quote by BobR:
Quote by Raine:
Quote by wickedpam:
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by wickedpam:
Holy fuck - they just struck down the buffer zones.

This one seems pretty narrow too - limited to public ways and sidewalks. States can legislate to ensure access but not on a broad scale. And on the other side, the anti-choice protesters got told on their silly BS argument that personal/group viewpoint should determine what valid access is.



Scoop, there's a women's clinic down the street from my place. Every weekend to get onto a service road I use I have to drive through idiot protesters standing so close to the road that I worry they're gonna throw themselves in front of my car. I'm not even going to the clinic and they intimidate me.

Red states that are a majority of anti-choice aren't going to do anything to provide safety to women who use these clinic's. Its still a war on women.
I have to totally agree with Mala on this one. They managed to close the clinic need my dentists office. When it was open, they were Intimidating to EVERYONE, even people like Bob and I for going to the damn dentist.

They didn't intimidate me - they pissed me off. I'd drive by them slowly and flip them a big fat bird and make sure they saw it.



I do.

There's a totally nice guy on the other side of the road, I think he might be from NARAL or something. He stands there by himself with all his pro-choice signs. Makes sure to stand out of the sidewalk and only in the public right of way. We wave every time we see him.

Comment by Raine on 06/26/2014 15:31:42
Comment by Scoopster on 06/26/2014 15:33:23
Welp.. Suarez (the Uruguayan player who got all bitey) just got slapped down hard. Suspended for 9 international matches, and he faces a hearing which could lead to another 4 month suspension from ALL FIFA MATCH PLAY and a fine.

Comment by BobR on 06/26/2014 15:33:29
Quote by Raine:
More Vileness.

They remind me junior high children acting like bullies on the playground. Redneck Public Policy. Idiocracy.

Comment by livingonli on 06/26/2014 15:34:17
Good morning, folks: Had to get up early for a Podiatrist appointment and now I have plenty to do today but at least I'm catching the rest of Momma:

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 15:48:05
Quote by Scoopster:
Welp.. Suarez (the Uruguayan player who got all bitey) just got slapped down hard. Suspended for 9 international matches, and he faces a hearing which could lead to another 4 month suspension from ALL FIFA MATCH PLAY and a fine.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/04/22/article-2312754-196DA6D1000005DC-349_306x423.jpg


My favorite player!

Comment by Will in Chicago on 06/26/2014 15:53:07
Think Progress has an analysis of the buffer zone decision.
[

The Supreme Court Just Made It Harder For Women To Exercise Their Right To Choose

Comment by Will in Chicago on 06/26/2014 15:54:19
Susie Madrak of Crooks and Liars analyzes the recess appointment decision.

SCOTUS Rules Against Obama Recess Appointment

Comment by TriSec on 06/26/2014 16:02:48
So, 'twas two years ago this afternoon I presented at MAH with a hot appendix. I still marvel sometimes that I'm still around.

Comment by Will in Chicago on 06/26/2014 16:04:33
Quote by TriSec:
So, 'twas two years ago this afternoon I presented at MAH with a hot appendix. I still marvel sometimes that I'm still around.



We are glad that you are here. It has been a long road.

Comment by Mondobubba on 06/26/2014 16:04:41
Quote by Will in Chicago:
Think Progress has an analysis of the buffer zone decision.
[

The Supreme Court Just Made It Harder For Women To Exercise Their Right To Choose



Wrong link. Got this: "Group Asks Americans To Send Dirty Underwear To Undocumented Immigrants"