For the first time, the United States may be willing to accept a United Nations condemnation of the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba without a fight, The Associated Press has learned.
U.S. officials tell the AP that the Obama administration is weighing abstaining from the annual U.N. General Assembly vote on a Cuban-backed resolution demanding that the embargo be lifted. The vote could come next month.
No decision has yet been made, said four administration officials who weren't authorized to speak publicly on sensitive internal deliberations and demanded anonymity. But merely considering an abstention is unprecedented. Following through on the idea would send shock waves through both the United Nations and Congress.
It is unheard of for a U.N. member state not to oppose resolutions critical of its own laws.
Quote by BobR:
They are letting us work from home starting tomorrow for the rest of the week because getting into the city and even into this building will be a nightmare.
Photo taken Sunday 9-20-15 by my friend Deborah Klinger. pic.twitter.com/FZlCPiwTs3
— Jim Beaver (@jumblejim) September 21, 2015
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by BobR:
They are letting us work from home starting tomorrow for the rest of the week because getting into the city and even into this building will be a nightmare.
Do you know if that's going to be the rule of thumb for fed workers too - trying to judge my commute this week.
Quote by BobR:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by BobR:
They are letting us work from home starting tomorrow for the rest of the week because getting into the city and even into this building will be a nightmare.
Do you know if that's going to be the rule of thumb for fed workers too - trying to judge my commute this week.
No clue - we are a private firm.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by BobR:
They are letting us work from home starting tomorrow for the rest of the week because getting into the city and even into this building will be a nightmare.
Do you know if that's going to be the rule of thumb for fed workers too - trying to judge my commute this week.
Quote by TriSec:
I shall remind everyone that I'm here at a different 'ground zero'. One wonders if His Holiness will acknowledge his minions' love of little boys this trip?
Quote by Scoopster:
Mornin' all..![]()
![]()
Now that the spotlight's on Ben Carson it's a good time to dive into who this man is.
Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
Have you ever watched Black Mirror?
Quote by Scoopster:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
Have you ever watched Black Mirror?
I have not, but I did read about that analogy. Only problem is Cameron did it as part of a stupidfratsecret society prank.
Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
The DNC approached the O’Malley campaign in February, March, and April with its six-debate proposal, according to Smith, and she said the campaign shot the DNC down each time. And not only was there no negotiation, Smith said, but the DNC also lied about the exclusivity clause, which stipulates that candidates can’t participate in events not sanctioned by the DNC. The party assured the O’Malley campaign there wouldn’t be one, Smith said, but then, an hour before announcing its debate schedule, it changed course.
Asked if Smith believes the DNC is limiting the number of debates in order to protect Clinton, who benefits from having the highest name-ID of any announced Democrat and is not exactly known for being light on her feet in debate, the O’Malley spokeswoman said, “In the absence of them offering any other excuse, I think that has to be the natural assumption.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
Have you ever watched Black Mirror?
Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
Have you ever watched Black Mirror?
:raises his hand: Yeah, I did. That is why I am calling shenanigans on this.
Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Mondobubba:Quote by wickedpam:Quote by Scoopster:
Just wow.. this David Cameron thing. Is the stupid disease that's infecting the US starting to affect Britain as well, or did we just inherit it from them centuries ago?
Have you ever watched Black Mirror?
:raises his hand: Yeah, I did. That is why I am calling shenanigans on this.
You think? I mean at the end the guy was viewed with sympathy and people loved him but would someone go that far to get the public on their side. Its obviously backfired at this point.
Quote by livingonli:
Good day, folks. Have to head out to the Doctor in a bit, but the interesting thing is to discover that BBC America has suddenly decided to start airing Tom Baker episodes which at least can give some people a chance to catch the old series unless you're lucky enough to have Retro TV or one of the few PBS stations that still run the old episodes.
Quote by wickedpam:
DouchBag
Quote by wickedpam:
DouchBag
Quote by wickedpam:
DouchBag
Quote by BobR:Quote by wickedpam:
DouchBag
He claims the increase is to raise money for a better treatment?? I call extreme bullshit on this one.