About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask a Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 03/07/2023 00:13:22

Good Morning.

Trying to get back to normal; we are all back safe from Florida. Aneesa has started her new job, and Javi is back to school for the remaining few weeks before graduation. So let's dive right in.


There are many curious things going on in the war in Ukraine. One is right from WWII - there's a Czech company that's been manufacturing inflatable decoys. It worked before, check out General Patton and Operation Fortitude.


PRAGUE — The war in Ukraine has created a surge in demand for weapons — and, apparently, also for inflatable fake armaments that can be deployed as decoys.

A Czech company, Inflatech, is producing more than 30 different inflatable military decoys ranging from tanks and armored vehicles to aircraft and howitzers. They also offer decoy versions of U.S.-made HIMARS rocket systems, that were among the billions of dollars in Western military aid that has helped Ukraine's war effort since Russia launched its invasion just over a year ago.

Inflatech Chief Executive Vojtech Fresser won't say if his decoys are used by Ukrainian forces battling Russian invaders, but he said Monday that his business was up by more than 30% last year. He expects growth to keep rising in double figures for at least another three to five years.

While he won't directly comment on support for Ukraine, he said: “I can imagine that if we want to support a partner country which is in trouble, we would send them inflatable decoys. Or it already has them, and if not, it will have them, for sure.”

Inflatech, based in the northern town of Decin, currently produces up to 50 decoys a month. They are sold to a number of unspecified countries, and all such exports have to be approved by the government of the NATO member.

The company uses light materials, such as artificial silk, so the total weight of a fake tank is up to 100 kilograms. It takes four soldiers to operate a decoy, with 10 minutes being enough to unwrap and inflate a fake piece of military hardware.

The decoys can contribute to victory by fooling enemy forces. The trick is to deceive cameras, thermo-cameras and radars to make them believe they have pinpointed a valuable target and use expensive missiles to destroy it.

“If I force the enemy to destroy a thing of mine by using something which is four times, but in reality it could be 20 times more expensive, than I’m the winner economically,” Fresser said.


I tend to see an awful lot of WWII metaphors in the current war, so this does reinforce my own personal opinion.

But - since we are allegedly a veteran's column, let's change gears. I have been here myself. During the Great Recession, we became very skilled in the TriSec household in what I now call "Klingon Math" - or, robbing Peter to pay Paul. It seems like active duty servicemembers are still facing that age-old question of food vs. shelter. It's unclear if the Pentagon is able to do anything about it.


Too many military families are in a no-win situation that has put their families’ health and well-being at risk. While addressing military family financial stress, the answer is relatively simple: we must ensure families have the fully funded benefits they’re told they can count on.

Over the last year, there has been an incredible and concerted focus on improving the economic security of service members and their families. Recurring themes like food insecurity, military spouse employment, health care and child care, commissary savings, and affordable housing have formed the nucleus of public perception.

But as our leaders, advocates, and those serving our nation have come to learn: the remedy for securing affordable basic needs is anything but basic.

According to the Department of Defense’s most recent survey of active duty military spouses, one in four have experienced food insecurity, nearly mirroring the food insecurity rate of service members. Military teens report even higher levels of food insecurity in their homes than their parents readily admit.

For the past decade, military spouses have endured an unwavering unemployment rate around 21%. This has presented too many military families with the challenge of trying to make ends meet on a single income. For junior enlisted personnel with families, that can feel nearly impossible.

A proposed fix? A basic needs allowance for the families who need it most. After significant dialogue and congressional involvement, DoD implemented a monthly allowance for active duty service members whose total household income falls below 130% of federal poverty guidelines. But sadly, based on recent reporting, it appears that few are eligible for this new allowance.

With over 1.3 million active duty members and 24% experiencing food insecurity along with their families, how do we close the gap for those who need help but aren’t getting it? An answer could lie at the intersection of food and housing.

Too often, military families find themselves skipping meals or opting for less nutritious options because they are forced to put food on the backburner to keep a roof over their heads. This isn’t a choice they should have to make — and it’s one DoD can fix.

Permanently restoring service members’ housing allowance to the full 100% will make an immediate, tangible difference for families struggling to keep their finances afloat.


it is a quiet week otherwise. And in an editorial comment here, I'll note that it seems to have been this way for a while. Many of the same issues that we have always reported on remain, but perhaps some small efforts have been made, as there are far less "crisis" stories than there were in years past.

Is it a sign of that "quiet competence" I once spoke of, concerning the current resident of the White House? It's not an area that is reported on heavily in the mainstream....but since I am reading the military news all the time, I personally can notice the trend.

I'll take that as a good sign for now.
 

7 comments (Latest Comment: 03/07/2023 22:53:18 by BobR)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by TriSec on 03/07/2023 10:56:51
And adding a bonus click this morning. Did you know that we're still in Iraq?


BAGHDAD, March 7 (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, making an unannounced trip to Iraq on Tuesday nearly 20 years after the U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein, said Washington was committed to keeping its military presence in the country

The 2003 invasion led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians and created instability that eventually paved the way for the rise of Islamic State militants after the U.S. withdrew its forces in 2011.

Austin, the most senior official in President Joe Biden’s administration to visit Iraq, was the last commanding general of U.S. forces there after the invasion.

"U.S. forces are ready to remain in Iraq at the invitation of the government of Iraq," Austin told reporters after meeting Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani.

"The United States will continue to strengthen and broaden our partnership in support of Iraqi security, stability, and sovereignty," he said.

The United States currently has 2,500 troops in Iraq - and an additional 900 in Syria - to help advise and assist local troops in combating Islamic State, who in 2014 seized swathes of territory in 2014 in both countries.


George W. Bush - the gift that keeps on giving!




Comment by Raine on 03/07/2023 14:22:14
Good Morning.



Comment by Raine on 03/07/2023 14:23:42
Glad you're back Tri.

Comment by Scoopster on 03/07/2023 14:50:12
Mornin' all..

It's a time of big changes at the office. Some changes are easier than others.

https://bucket.bluegartr.com/7f56c3550b0632da79fefdf938b05238.png


Comment by Raine on 03/07/2023 15:42:41
Quote by Scoopster:
Mornin' all..

It's a time of big changes at the office. Some changes are easier than others.

https://bucket.bluegartr.com/7f56c3550b0632da79fefdf938b05238.png

Oh Wow.


Comment by Scoopster on 03/07/2023 15:57:12
And yeah, I gave up Twitter on a personal level months ago. I didn't want to do the work one too.

Elon forced our hand tho. He changed it so you have to have a subscription in order to have 2FA security, and if you didn't disable 2FA or subscribe before next week your account would be locked.

2FA is BASIC FUCKING WEBSITE SECURITY. It's not something you can force people to pay for.

Comment by BobR on 03/07/2023 22:53:18
I saw the story about the inflatable fake military equipment. You'd think it would be easy to tell the difference using technology, but I suppose Russia isn't as advanced in that way as we might think.

I'm all for giving vets what they need. Also - create fewer vets by not going to way unnecessarily.