About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

It Ain't Easy Being Green
Author: BobR    Date: 11/14/2008 12:35:46

We've had a lot of reasons to hate Bush and the Right-wing noise machine (RWNM) over the last 8 years, including (but not limited to) war, dehumanizing whole sectors of society, and greed. Greed makes people do bad things: they push aside ethical behavior, they trample on other people in their path, and they put the concerns of business over everything else.

That "else" would include the air we breathe and the water we drink. The Bush Administration (with the help of the RWNM) has spewed enough truthiness into the debate, that any real progress has been effectively quelled. The result has been an acceleration of global warming to a point where we are poised on the precipice of disaster, if we haven't gone over the edge already.

The citizens of the Maldives apparently think we've gone over it. They are currently looking for a new island, because theirs is slowly being inundated:
Many scientists believe that, given enough political will, humanity can still manage to avoid catastrophic climate change. But the president-elect of the Maldives isn’t taking any chances.

Mohamed Nasheed, who was sworn in Tuesday as the Maldives’ first democratically elected president, says that rising sea levels threaten to inundate the tiny Indian Ocean island nation. He has announced plans for a fund to buy land elsewhere in the region, where the country’s population, estimated to be about 386,000, could rebuild their lives.
[...]
The UN climate panel predicts that, unless greenhouse emissions are curbed, sea levels could rise by 25 to 58 centimeters by the end of the century. More recent studies, such as this one published in the journal Science, sharply increase the projected sea level rise, to as high as two meters.

If this happens, the Maldives would be uninhabitable. But Maldivians wouldn’t be the first population displaced by global warming.

That distinction probably belongs to the half million residents of Bangladesh’s Bhola Island whose homes were swallowed in 1995 by rising sea levels. In 2005, the 1,600 residents of Papua New Guinea’s Carteret Islands began evacuation, as the advancing sea continued to destroy gardens, sink homes, and contaminate freshwater supplies. Also that year, 100 residents of Vanuatu’s island of Tegua had to be evacuated as their homes became permanently flooded.

Other low-lying Pacific islands that could disappear in this century include those in Tuvalu, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, and Fiji.

Funny thing - I remember environmental scientists warning us about this for years, and the RWNM calling them Chicken Littles (or "environmental terrorists"). Turns out the scientists were right. Maybe there IS something to this whole "science thing" after all... :rolleyes2:

Fortunately, we will have a new president in a couple months, one that will actually try to do something about it. In fact, he has said he will act "quickly":
Barack Obama, who has spent much of the time since his election closeted with his advisers in Chicago, sent a strong signal yesterday that he plans a decisive break with George Bush on environmental policy once he moves into the White House.

The move was part of a carefully coded series of messages from Obama meant to reassure America and the world about the shape of his administration, which does not assume power until January 20.
[...]
In one such signal the president-elect sent Jason Grumet, a policy adviser mentioned for a possible energy post, to an environmental conference in Washington to offer reassurances that there would be swift movement on climate change legislation. "The whole transition team felt it important to be here," Grumet said. "I think it is going to be a very very busy 2009, and I think we are going to need all of you to be on top of your game."
[...]
It was the second time in 24 hours that Obama had tried to reassure the world that he wanted a radical departure from Bush's policy on the environment. Obama has said repeatedly that the global economic crisis remains his top priority, but John Podesta, part of the troika overseeing the transition, said on Tuesday that the environment was at the top of the Democrats' agenda. "I anticipate him moving very aggressively and very rapidly on the whole question of transforming the energy platform in the United States from high carbon energy to low carbon energy," he said.

The one aspect of Obama's environmental policy that has some people concerned is his seeming support for "Clean Coal" technology. What is it? It's essentially a collection of methods to reduce carbon emissions into the atmosphere. The problems, of course, are that the carbon (dioxide) ends up going someplace else, some of the methods are worse than the cure, and mining for coal is a great way to destroy a mountain... or an entire range. "Clean Coal" is yet another misnomer from the people that gave us the "Clean Skies Initiative", the "Healthy Forests Initiative", and "No Child Left Behind" (At least they didn't give us "jumbo shrimp").

Coal power is so early 20th century that there are organized groups that want us to end our dependence on coal. In fact, the Rainforest Action Network is having a national Day of Action Against Coal Finance over the next ... um ... two days (it's a very long day) - today and tomorrow. The idea is to push "banks to stop funding coal development and other carbon-intensive projects that contribute heavily to global climate change, and to elicit meaningful emission reduction targets for their operations and investments".

Take a look and see if you can participate in any protest. You might need to squeeze it in with a Prop 8 protest tomorrow, but you can just make a day of it. The planet will thank you.


 

159 comments (Latest Comment: 11/15/2008 03:31:19 by MMB)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati