Zephyr, who is transgender, has been blocked from speaking since last week. That's when she told supporters of a bill to ban gender-affirming care that when they bowed their heads in prayer, she hoped they would see "blood on [their] hands." She says she was alluding to studies that show that transgender health care can reduce suicidality in youth. (snip)
"I have fielded calls from families in Montana, including one family whose trans teenager attempted to take her life while watching a hearing on one of the anti-trans bills," Zephyr said during the debate Wednesday. "So, when I rose up and said 'there is blood on your hands,' I was not being hyperbolic," she said.
Frank Daley, executive director of the Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission, on Wednesday hand-delivered the complaint, in which David Begley, an Omaha-based attorney, argued Hunt has a potential financial conflict of interest with Legislative Bill 574.
LB 574 would prohibit puberty blockers, hormone therapies and genital or non-genital surgeries for minors. The bill, proposed by State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, has been center stage in the 2023 session, sparking near-endless filibusters and bringing the Legislature to a crawl.
During the March 22 debate on LB 574, Hunt described how the bill would impact her and her 12-year-old son, who is trans.
“The point isn’t that I could gain financially if my kid has rights,” Hunt said Wednesday. “The point is the harassment.”
Nebraska Senator Kathleen Kauth used funds provided by a well known Nebraska hate group to pay for her anti-trans bill testimony. Stephanie Johnson of NFFV explains her motives here. NFFV is the hate group my father in law started. Senator Erdman & others are members. pic.twitter.com/VC9uWxhPJo
— Jamie Lynn Bonkiewicz (She/Her) (@jamielynn261982) February 10, 2023
The sudden flood of state-level efforts to restrict transgender rights is being fueled by many of the Christian and conservative groups that led the charge against Roe v. Wade. (snip)
Critics and civil liberties advocates say anti-transgender proposals reflect a narrow, religious worldview on gender and other issues while endangering free speech and non-discriminatory education.
"They want to preserve their vision of a white, Christian America (and) they're willing to embrace all sorts of anti-democratic means to protect it," said Robert P. Jones, CEO of Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), a nonpartisan group that examines religion and policy.