About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Selling the Brooklyn Bridge
Author: BobR    Date: 09/29/2010 11:56:04

As we come down the final stretch of this campaign season, there's one thing we can always count on - political ads. You know the type - they start grainy and ominous, describing how a candidate is one of the devil's own, with unflattering black and white photos. Then - it suddenly becomes warm & fuzzy and full color, describing the virtues of the other candidate, with the de rigeur ending of "I'm ______ and I approve this message". There is a reason for that last bit - it's required by law. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 made it a requirement to minimize anonymous attack ads.

However, the law does not apply to on-line advertisements, and it does not apply to PACs. That last bit is important, especially after the recent Supreme Court ruling on corporate campaign donations. In a country where freedom of speech is codified and revered, money talks the loudest. Who has been speaking the loudest? It's been neither the Democrats nor the Republicans - it's been the PACs. Look at the chart at the link and page through previous weeks. You'll see "American Future Fund", "Americans for Job Security", "U.S. Chamber of Commerce", "Americans for Tax Reform", "Club for Growth". These ALL spend 100% on Republican candidates. Yes, there are some PACs that spend on Democrats too, mostly unions.

When you see an ad that doesn't have an "I approve this message" tacked onto the end, then it is likely coming from one of these PACs. If you watch closely, you'll usually see a "paid for by..." message that flashes quickly at the bottom of the screen. These organizations often have innocuous names (like above - "U.S. Chamber of Commerce"? Doesn't every small town have a Chamber of Commerce? Yes, but the country itself doesn't. It's a Republican PAC).

Living in DC, we see (and hear, on the radio) ads against energy taxes (paid for by a petroleum lobbyist), ads for certain military equipment (paid for by the military contractor itself - with funds ultimately derived via tax dollars), ads against regulations, etc. etc. etc... It has made us very tuned in to WHO is producing the ad. That is VERY important.

It's even more important this season with the growth of super PACs:
Three dozen of the new committees have been registered with the Federal Election Commission over the past two months, including such major players as the conservative Club for Growth, the Republican-allied American Crossroads and the liberal women's group Emily's List.

FEC records show that super PACs have spent more than $8 million on television advertising and other expenditures, almost all of it within the past month. Groups favoring GOP candidates have outspent Democratic supporters by more than 3 to 1, mirroring an overall surge in spending by the Republican Party and its allies in recent weeks, records show.

The super PACs have "opened the door to the clearest, easiest way to spend unlimited funds on an election," said Trevor Potter, a former FEC chairman who served as general counsel to GOP presidential candidate John McCain in 2008. "This is pretty much the holy grail that people have been looking for."

It's five weeks until election day. We are going to be saturated with advertising. The ads from the campaigns themselves are bad enough. The ads from the PACs are more insidious. It's time to remain vigilant and be prepared to take the contents of the ads with a grain of salt until you can verify the veracity of the claims. People with a lot of money are hoping they can sell you a bill of goods - it's up to each one of us individually to counter the sales pitch with truth.

 

67 comments (Latest Comment: 10/01/2010 02:44:17 by Raine)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 12:26:33
Good Morning!

It's an interesting thing, who is funding the campaigns. We've got a four-way going for governor here in this Commonwealth. The Republican Governor's Association curiously went after the independent candidate instead of the Democrat; it was very succesful in that it destroyed his campaign. They've been in a tailspin ever since. (Tim Cahill-I) Many unions are attacking Charlie Baker (R-Swampscott), who was a Healthcare CEO and a prior member of the Romney Administration. He also oversaw the Big Dig and pretty much put the state's finances in the shitter.

Governor Patrick (D-MA) has pretty much remained above the fray and let the PACs battle it out as his surrogates. The few official campaign ads I have seen have been mostly positive.

The Green Candidate, Jill Stein, is barely on the radar screen, although she has been making some waves during the debates.


Finally, despite the Sox sucking prong this season, my second team made it in last night!

http://www.nationalsportsbeat.com/images/logos/mlb/Cincinnati_Reds.jpg


Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 12:37:18
Comment by Scoopster on 09/29/2010 12:53:56
Good morning all! End of month is here.. gonna need more coffee!

Was wading through the ORIGINAL online chat (aka IRC) and someone in the room mentioned their town leaders are trying to have Muslim gravesites moved.

Colbert also covered this latest wingnut atrocity last night.. with his usual flair!



Edit: UGH... link didn't work let's try this:

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Terror a New One
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes2010 ElectionMarch to Keep Fear Alive


Comment by Scoopster on 09/29/2010 12:58:20
Also, thanks to my very persistent state rep, I'm FINALLY getting my state tax refund.
Which means.. I'm goin' to DC this weekend AND at the end of October too!

Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 13:00:55
Morning

Back at work......

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 13:09:30
Hi Pam.

We were doing the winter outerwear floorset at the store last night. Did you ever check for those boots?



Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 13:11:19
Quote by TriSec:
Hi Pam.

We were doing the winter outerwear floorset at the store last night. Did you ever check for those boots?




I did online when first mentioned but didn't see them - let me check again since ya'll are doing the set

Thanks for the heads up!

Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 13:15:02
oohhh, I'm so close... they have the snow sneaker bu not the low ones with the velcor

Comment by Scoopster on 09/29/2010 13:17:58
Morning Mala!

Quote by TriSec:
Hi Pam.

We were doing the winter outerwear floorset at the store last night. Did you ever check for those boots?

Oooh that reminds me I still need to get new snow/mud boots before the winter hits. Damn waterproof Hush Puppies my mom got me a couple years back have holes in the soles!

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 13:22:02
Quote by Scoopster:
Also, thanks to my very persistent state rep, I'm FINALLY getting my state tax refund.
Which means.. I'm goin' to DC this weekend AND at the end of October too!

so does that mean we are finally going to have a face to face meet up with you?

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 13:23:12
Quote by Scoopster:



Was wading through the ORIGINAL online chat (aka IRC) and someone in the room mentioned their town leaders are trying to have Muslim gravesites moved.






Well, I'd best not die, then. Boston is about 180 miles away from Ground Zero. Guess that's too close.



Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 13:25:56
Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 13:27:58
So you heard yesterday that Christine O'Donnal claimed to have attended Oxford?

Another School on her resume disclaims that they don;t know of her.
Claremont Graduate University has no student or education record for an individual named Christine O'Donnell.


Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 13:34:09
Hmph.

When is National Martini Day? Or National Bacon Day, for that matter?

(I know, I know....)



Comment by Scoopster on 09/29/2010 13:55:33
Quote by Raine:
So you heard yesterday that Christine O'Donnal claimed to have attended Oxford?

Another School on her resume disclaims that they don;t know of her.
Claremont Graduate University has no student or education record for an individual named Christine O'Donnell.

Sigh! a life without lying or masturbation? Seems boring to me..

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 13:56:10
I see my decision to resign is still the correct one. They are dismantling more cubicles in the office today, probably to ship them to Texas.

Five years ago, there were over 400 jobs in this building, but manufacturing moved to Mexico (thank you, NAFTA!) and shipping moved to Texas last year. It's only a matter of time before sales and marketing follows, and the US loses another manufacturer for good.



Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 13:57:51
Loves me some Lukovich....


http://blogs.ajc.com/mike-luckovich/files/2010/09/mike09292010.jpg


Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 14:02:39
Quote by TriSec:
Hmph.

When is National Martini Day? Or National Bacon Day, for that matter?

(I know, I know....)

National Martini Day is June 19.

National Bacon Day is the Saturday before Labor Day.


Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 14:05:44
TRMS:

The Repukes and the Tea Party want a government shutdown. Have they checked out Somalia recently? The end result is negative.



Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 14:18:54
Why would ANY even semi respected Journalist bother to talk to this puke face?

James O'keefe tried to 'punk' CNN correspondent

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 14:21:50
I won't miss this POS computer I've been wrestling with for months. Another bonus going back to the healthcare industry....we always have top-of-the-line equipment.



Comment by Scoopster on 09/29/2010 14:23:52
Quote by Raine:
Why would ANY even semi respected Journalist bother to talk to this puke face?

James O'keefe tried to 'punk' CNN correspondent

Why isn't this douchebag in jail?

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 14:34:26
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by Raine:
Why would ANY even semi respected Journalist bother to talk to this puke face?

James O'keefe tried to 'punk' CNN correspondent

Why isn't this douchebag in jail?
that is a damn good question.




Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 14:40:37
The Pew Research Religion Quiz

found a short verison of that Religion quiz Pew did - I scored 80% - not to bad for not believing that a church isn't a building and you don't beat someone over the head with your beliefs

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 14:43:05
This lady is SO damn LawnGuyland! I it!

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 14:48:38
I wish he would turn this around and ask "why do you care?"

Perhaps the best quote I've ever heard about religion comes from a Wiccan, actually.

"Why cut down a tree to build a church when you could simply worship the tree?"



Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 14:51:44
Quote by wickedpam:
The Pew Research Religion Quiz

found a short verison of that Religion quiz Pew did - I scored 80% - not to bad for not believing that a church isn't a building and you don't beat someone over the head with your beliefs



14 out of 15. Missed the "Great Awakening" question.




Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 14:52:28
Eric Roberts is a douchnozzle.

Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 14:56:36
Quote by TriSec:
Quote by wickedpam:
The Pew Research Religion Quiz

found a short verison of that Religion quiz Pew did - I scored 80% - not to bad for not believing that a church isn't a building and you don't beat someone over the head with your beliefs



14 out of 15. Missed the "Great Awakening" question.





I missed that one too - and missed the start of the sabbath - forgot it was sundown the previous day

Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 14:56:54
Quote by Raine:
Eric Roberts is a douchnozzle.


but a crazy one

Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 14:59:17
Time to go count the nouveau orders - back in a bit

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 15:23:37
This whole religious thing.....once again, I'd tie it back to intellectual curiosity.

I read things about Martin Luther, or Joseph Smith, or Muhammed (PBUH), I know that there are more things to hunt down out there about these people.

Other folks only know what their preacher tells them on Sunday, if they're even paying attention.

I have actually read the entire Bible cover to cover, parts of the Bhagavad Ghita, bits here and there of the Ba'hai teachings, and I'm about halfway through the Quran right now. These are all just starting points to a larger world.



Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 15:23:45
Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 15:42:47



Deep in the article....

I'd have to agree with Ms. O'donnell on this.


"My opponent wants to bring Yale values to US Senate."


The last few White House residents have been Yalies, and at least one candidate. (Kerry, D-MA). I think we've had quite enough of "Yale Values" at the top.

Barack is a Harvard guy. We can tell the difference.



Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 15:58:17
I do love when Hal does Ruth Gordon

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 15:59:04
Quote by wickedpam:

I do love when Hal does Ruth Gordon


THAT was AWESOME!

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 16:01:05
And in the vein of today's blog...

Lunch awaits us.

Lunch awaits us, indeed.

Lift up your lunch.

We lift it up to the microwave.

Let us give thanks for the lunch, our meal.

It is right to give lunch thanks and praise.



(sorry, sorry. I'll go directly to the lake of fire now.)


Comment by Scoopster on 09/29/2010 16:52:08
Quote by TriSec:
And in the vein of today's blog...

Lunch awaits us.

Lunch awaits us, indeed.

Lift up your lunch.

We lift it up to the microwave.

Let us give thanks for the lunch, our meal.

It is right to give lunch thanks and praise.



(sorry, sorry. I'll go directly to the lake of fire now.)



Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 17:13:59
F*CK you Dan Gainor -- A lot of progressives are not 9/11 truthers --

Comment by TriSec on 09/29/2010 17:24:36
Oh, I dunno Raine. There's 9/11 truth to be had out there.

It's not even on how or why we got caught with our pants down; I'd be interested in what happened during the response.

Compare and contrast Payne Stewart's intercept (ca. 1999) to what happened 2 years later. Why so different?

And it still kills me that the F-15s out of Otis weren't given the green light to go supersonic. They missed being there in time by less than 5 minutes, you know. (not that they would have been able to do anything, but they should have been there.)


Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 17:49:32
Hey TRI!!! That slimy piece of Crap O'Keefe tried to pull his crappy shitty journalism in Mass...

And I suspect he is guilty of Insurance Fraud with this video.



They keep reusing the same assnine clips, and try to re-edit them together -- but I am pretty sure they are admitting to insurance fraud on this video.

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 17:50:30
Quote by TriSec:
Oh, I dunno Raine. There's 9/11 truth to be had out there.

It's not even on how or why we got caught with our pants down; I'd be interested in what happened during the response.

Compare and contrast Payne Stewart's intercept (ca. 1999) to what happened 2 years later. Why so different?

And it still kills me that the F-15s out of Otis weren't given the green light to go supersonic. They missed being there in time by less than 5 minutes, you know. (not that they would have been able to do anything, but they should have been there.)
Having questions about what happened that day is a lot different than what Gainor was talking about.




Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 18:10:29
Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 18:12:49
Oh HEll -- this is NOT cool.


I am sure that Nikkie has the documentation for these allegations.

Comment by livingonli on 09/29/2010 18:15:46
A belated good day to everyone. Been busy today. Not to mention the computer took away to uninstall a program but I reclaimed 1G of hard drive space which helps with this old unit.

Comment by wickedpam on 09/29/2010 18:20:02



So I tuned in late - what did Nikki endure?

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 18:25:45
SO here is the synopsis: The nanny, who worked for Whitman for 9 years, was illegal immigrant. Whitman never asked for documents.

Instead paid her for 15 hours a week @ $23 dollars an hour for 8 years -- kee in mind she was asked to clean house adn be a NAnny.

She was fired when the woman asked her for help to become documented -- after Ms. Whitman declared her candidacy.

Comment by Raine on 09/29/2010 18:28:37
Quote by wickedpam:



So I tuned in late - what did Nikki endure?
/nikki was taken advantage of, it seems due to the fact that she was an undocumented alien.


She's filing a claim for unpaid wages. Whitman's housekeeper undocumented, Whitman never asked her for documentation it seems. Even after SSA alerted Whitman to SS# discrepanciers.

Alred alleges she used illegal status as blackmail