About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Budget Balancing: Axe & Blindold Vs. Scalpel & Lasers
Author: Raine    Date: 02/14/2011 13:52:18

The President will be offering his Budget proposal this morning. The Washington Post reports:
Obama also would raise hundreds of billions of dollars in fresh revenue, which Republicans adamantly oppose. He would increase taxes on the wealthy by limiting the value of their itemized deductions and by allowing the recently extended George W. Bush-era tax breaks to expire in 2012. He would end subsidies for oil and gas companies, and would eliminate certain tax breaks for corporations that do business overseas. And he assumes that Congress will develop a plan to pay for a $556 billion transportation bill, a measure traditionally funded by increasing the federal tax on gasoline.

Let's hope he and Congress can get this done. This looks like a serious way to go toward balancing the budget. It is time for a mature and realistic discussion to happen with regard to our nation's economic woes. This proposal, at first glance, makes sense, even if there are some difficult decisions to be made. There's a little bit of everything to make pretty much everyone unhappy with something. As I wrote before, it's a Simple Unspoken Truth:
You cannot cut debt without paying the debt down. For those that say Government should be able to balance a budget just like Americans have to, we say this, from personal experience:
In order to balance a budget, you must be able to pay off debt as well as save money. One cannot cut personal debt without money to pay the debt off. Cutting taxes when we have such debt and deficits is akin to a regular American family taking a pay cut in order to balance a budget, because they think it will mean they are paying less taxes, and thus saving money. The logic is seriously flawed. In the real world, people increase their revenue stream by taking 2nd job, and cutting their expenses. For the Federal government, increasing the revenue stream means increasing taxes (or rolling back tax cuts).

You can't get out of debt without paying it down. The federal government must pay down the debt -- lowering taxes even more than we are is not an answer. If one truly loves their country they way they love their family and its budgeting process, they should know that you need to pay the bills and THEN pay extra in order to get out of debt. It’s not enough to just reduce the deficit – it must be eliminated and a surplus generated to pay off some of the principal.
The GOP will --and has -- proposed slashing social programs of all types, including the much beloved AmeriCorps. From E.J. Dionne:
A telling example: The party that purports to love community- and church-based efforts to help the poor and downtrodden even zeroed out AmeriCorps, the national service program that has long enjoyed support across party lines. AmeriCorps, remember, gives out small grants that leverage an enormous amount of voluntary work for the groups George W. Bush used to praise as “the armies of compassion.
On top of all this, they still insist upon even more tax cuts. It needs to be said once again, you cannot cut down debt with no money. It's one thing to cut spending, but it is also possible to go too far. Yesterday the Speaker of the House did just that with the GOP hyperbole.
"He's going to present a budget tomorrow that's going to continue to destroy jobs by spending too much, borrowing too much, taxing too much," Boehner said on NBC's "Meet the Press." [snip]

"We're broke," said Boehner. "What's really dangerous is if we continue to do nothing and allow the status quo to stay in place."

Boehner said Republicans are delivering on their campaign pledge to cut $100 billion in spending, but called it just a start.

"While we believe we've met our committments that we made in the pledge to America, I've said there's no limit to the amount of money that our members want to cut," Boehner said.
From Steve Benen at the Washington Monthly:
Consider the cuts the House GOP wants to make this fiscal year. We're talking about deep reductions in education, transportation, law enforcement, food safety, environmental protections, and community health centers, among many other areas. The result -- indeed, the intended result -- is to lay off thousands of teachers, police officers, medical professionals, food inspectors, etc.

It is, to borrow a phrase, the epitome of a "job-killing" plan. Given the GOP agenda, this is a feature, not a bug -- the whole point is to reduce the public-sector workforce, and push these thousands of workers into unemployment.

With this in mind, it's almost amusing to see the House Speaker tell a national television audience that we need to avoid an agenda that would "destroy jobs." Is he not aware of what he's proposed?

In effect, Boehner is arguing, "Obama's agenda might put more Americans out of work. It's better to go with my agenda, which will definitely put more Americans out of work."
To date, the GOP-led House has not put forth one single bill to create jobs in the private OR public sector. I would like to know who the "We" is that the House speaker is referring to. If it is the country, as I suspect, I would like to know how one can cut spending the way they are proposing. You can't cut what does not exist. The GOP is proposing to eliminate jobs from both the Public and private Sector, this is a fact. They want to cut spending for the rest of THIS fiscal year, which would eliminate many infrastructure projects that have already been started, and not yet completed. Take a look:
Now, Republican leaders are coalescing around a proposal to “cancel unused spending authority in the 2009 stimulus bill” that could block funds from flowing to ongoing stimulus projects. However, Republicans have failed to fully explain the repercussions for such a radical budget proposal. <...>

HALF-FINISHED PROJECT IN MISSOURI: $44.5 million in stimulus funds was committed to an expansion of Highway 141 in St. Louis County. Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO), who claimed the stimulus failed and is part of the Republican caucus calling for an end to already-committed stimulus funds, attended the ground breaking ceremony for the project (watch a video of his remarks here). The project will not be completed until summer of 2012. The picture to the right was taken in January, and shows ongoing construction on Highway 141 that will be frozen if Akin’s budget proposal is successful.
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/mostimulus1.jpg


HALF-FINISHED PROJECT IN SOUTH CAROLINA: The stimulus provided $1.6 billion for decommissioning a Cold War-era Heavy Water Components Test Reactor at the Savannah River Site. The project, which has created over 3,356 direct jobs, was primarily championed by Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC). However, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), another vocal opponent of the stimulus, said he helped Clyburn obtain the project because it will “set the stage for the state to benefit from nuclear jobs in the future.” A revealing story by Yvonne Wenger of the Post and Courier newspaper details the vast economic benefits of the effort, and how the program is helping local workers care for their families in an economically-depressed region of the country. Representatives for the firm handling the Savannah River Site project told ThinkProgress that the project is still reliant on stimulus funds and that it is still ongoing. The picture above was taken in January and shows recent construction efforts.
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/scstimulus1.jpg


HALF-FINISHED PROJECT IN IOWA: The stimulus provided $25 million in funds for a project to replace the vertical lift bridge in Burlington near the Illinois border. Authorities had long complained about safety hazards regarding the 119-year-old swing-span bridge, and were eager for the 100 jobs the project was expected to create. According to the railway company BNSF, stimulus-opponent Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) joined area Democrats in supporting the project. Last month, BNSF posted a video of the bridge construction project, which will not be completed until later this year.
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/iowastimulus1.jpg


That will not help the economy at all, and the Speaker of the House AND the GOP knows this. The problem is that no one is telling the American people that support them. It's a sham shame.

and
Raine


 

51 comments (Latest Comment: 02/15/2011 01:12:06 by TriSec)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by wickedpam on 02/14/2011 14:01:23
Morning

Comment by Scoopster on 02/14/2011 14:08:05
Morning all & Happy Pitchers & Catchers Day!

Comment by wickedpam on 02/14/2011 14:12:28
I think the ustream chat room is just a bunch of suck ups at this point

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 14:17:26
C-PAC was insane this year.

Comment by BobR on 02/14/2011 14:19:54
when the hearts and flowers become a little too much:



Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 14:23:56
This was very interesting. Joe Klein writes:
An interesting weekend in Washington. Two conventions claiming 11,000 attendees each. One, the CPAC convention was heavily reported in the press--including by me, below; the other was the annual Teach For America alumni conference, where I moderated a panel after I'd spent three days listening to the Republican presidential candidates at CPAC. Both crowds were pretty young, but they could not have been more different. The CPAC crowd was full of grievances--America was falling apart, into a European-style socialism, the tax burden "crushing" entrepreneurs. The TFA crowd was full of questions--how do you educate more kids and teach them better, how do you deal with the stultifying education bureaucracies, how do you take the rigor and excellence that marks TFA into the broader society? If the most important question at CPAC was the one that Ron Paul asked of his young supporters--if we offer you 10% tax rates for the rest of your life, would you agree to ask nothing of the government?--the TFA alumni would answer Paul's question with another question: What would a plan like that do for us as a society? And another question: Do you really believe that this is the most important question you can ask of citizens in a democracy? And another: Does the level of taxation have anything to do with the pursuit of happiness? Were people less happy in the 1950s and 1960s, when the marginal rates could reach as high as 70%--or in the 1990s, when the top rate was six points higher than it is today?


A tale of 2 mindsets, indeed.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 14:31:13
Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 15:16:46
Those aren't jobs, Raine.
Government never created a job.

You only need enough edumacation to adjust your video display device to show Fox News and stagger to the voting booth and vote "R". Besides, only enough peons are needed to service and protect the 1%. The rest are expendable.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 15:24:43
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Those aren't jobs, Raine.
Government never created a job.

You only need enough edumacation to adjust your video display device to show Fox News and stagger to the voting booth and vote "R". Besides, only enough peons are needed to service and protect the 1%. The rest are expendable.

Hey Rabbit, Go back and take another look at the blog. I added ALOT more to it about 3 minutes ago.

But I do understand your point.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 15:25:15
The Blog has been VASTLY updated, I hope you all don;t mind taking a little look see at it now.

Comment by Scoopster on 02/14/2011 15:29:12
Ugh.. the new DailyKos layout is horrendous!

Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 15:32:52
Raine, I was actually responding to the Washington Monthly article where, yes the main effect of these cuts will be to throw thousands out of work. But we already know the Republicans don't believe in Education or any restrictions on how badly the environment can be polluted.

I did look over the proposed Continuing Resolution cuts over the weekend when it was shown that PBS and NPR were in danger (actually it's the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that's getting defunded and that's even worse) and surprise, the only department getting any increase was Defense. Of course, it's billed as "Common Sense" funding levels.

Great additions to the bloggie though. Essentially, if the cuts hold, it will be money wasted and we'll be even worse off infrastructure wise than if nothing was done.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 15:36:31
Quote by Scoopster:
Ugh.. the new DailyKos layout is horrendous!

oh my.

It looks like an orange version of the original Huffpo. I think this is going to take a little getting used to.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 15:37:57
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Raine, I was actually responding to the Washington Monthly article where, yes the main effect of these cuts will be to throw thousands out of work. But we already know the Republicans don't believe in Education or any restrictions on how badly the environment can be polluted.

I did look over the proposed Continuing Resolution cuts over the weekend when it was shown that PBS and NPR were in danger (actually it's the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that's getting defunded and that's even worse) and surprise, the only department getting any increase was Defense. Of course, it's billed as "Common Sense" funding levels.
I think that we can get those cuts put back in. At least I hope so.

I really wish we would just cut the damn defense budget by 1-2% (I'd love to see more, you all know) But enough already!


Comment by wickedpam on 02/14/2011 15:40:29
I think focusing on sports with education is horrible - we aren't creating well rounded kids and adults

Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 15:45:27
Quote by Raine:
Quote by Scoopster:
Ugh.. the new DailyKos layout is horrendous!

oh my.

It looks like an orange version of the original Huffpo. I think this is going to take a little getting used to.


And that garish TiVo ad on the top makes it even worse.


Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 15:47:06
Sorry, Wisconsin. That's what you voted in. Thought you had more brains than that. It's not like he didn't warn you.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 15:53:22
Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 15:54:26
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Sorry, Wisconsin. That's what you voted in. Thought you had more brains than that. It's not like he didn't warn you.

It's really sad.

Comment by Scoopster on 02/14/2011 16:01:43
Quote by Raine:
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Sorry, Wisconsin. That's what you voted in. Thought you had more brains than that. It's not like he didn't warn you.

It's really sad.

And they always produce some of the worst Repubs ever too, from McCarthy in the 50s right on up to this guy.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 16:02:23
Quote by Raine:
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Raine, I was actually responding to the Washington Monthly article where, yes the main effect of these cuts will be to throw thousands out of work. But we already know the Republicans don't believe in Education or any restrictions on how badly the environment can be polluted.

I did look over the proposed Continuing Resolution cuts over the weekend when it was shown that PBS and NPR were in danger (actually it's the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that's getting defunded and that's even worse) and surprise, the only department getting any increase was Defense. Of course, it's billed as "Common Sense" funding levels.
I think that we can get those cuts put back in. At least I hope so.

I really wish we would just cut the damn defense budget by 1-2% (I'd love to see more, you all know) But enough already!


I hope so too. I don't know how that would be done, though. Not sure how CRs work, does the Senate and Obama have to sign off on it.

In any event, cutting off CPB endangers PBS and NPR by removing direct funding to the stations themselves. It doesn't matter how little of the networks' budgets are affected, without stations to carry the programming, the networks don't exist. New Jersey is already putting their public radio stations on the auction block in the slim hope of keeping the TV side going because their budget was slashed. New Jersey better get ready to welcome 9 new religious broadcasters. I got into a mild Facebook argument where the side was taken that if the public radio stations can't make it with commercials, too bad. My response was that if you look at what passes for commercial radio, you know it won't fly, we need something not geared to the lowest common denominator.

Of course, you know I'm rather pessimistic about the state of broadcasting in general.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 16:11:16
Who the heck names their city after a sports announcer?

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 16:13:32
BTW, wrt the Pell grant cuts the POTUS is suggesting, I think this is interesting:
The first proposal would end the "year-round Pell" policy that let students collect two grants in a calendar year, with the second grant used for summer school. The official said the costs exceeded expectations and there was little evidence that students earn their degrees any faster.

The change would save $8 billion next year and $60 billion over a decade, the official said.

A second proposal would reduce loan subsidies for graduate and professional students. That would free $2 billion next year and save $29 billion over 10 years, according to the official.

[...] Another $4 billion in savings over 10 years would be achieved by broadening the use of IRS data to determine eligibility, reducing improper payments and easing the application process, the official said.
[...] The administration is projecting a shortfall of more than $20 billion in the program for the 2012. Without action, officials say, the maximum award would have to be cut by more than $2,500 to meet demand.
it is my understanding that the max amount students can get for a Pell grant will not change. HE letting the IRS play a bigger part in determining eligibility. I remember when I went to college back in 84, it was the IRS that determined it. I guess that has changed vastly over the years, due to our ongoing privatization of everything.



Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 16:15:41
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Quote by Raine:
Quote by trojanrabbit:
Raine, I was actually responding to the Washington Monthly article where, yes the main effect of these cuts will be to throw thousands out of work. But we already know the Republicans don't believe in Education or any restrictions on how badly the environment can be polluted.

I did look over the proposed Continuing Resolution cuts over the weekend when it was shown that PBS and NPR were in danger (actually it's the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that's getting defunded and that's even worse) and surprise, the only department getting any increase was Defense. Of course, it's billed as "Common Sense" funding levels.
I think that we can get those cuts put back in. At least I hope so.

I really wish we would just cut the damn defense budget by 1-2% (I'd love to see more, you all know) But enough already!


I hope so too. I don't know how that would be done, though. Not sure how CRs work, does the Senate and Obama have to sign off on it.

In any event, cutting off CPB endangers PBS and NPR by removing direct funding to the stations themselves. It doesn't matter how little of the networks' budgets are affected, without stations to carry the programming, the networks don't exist. New Jersey is already putting their public radio stations on the auction block in the slim hope of keeping the TV side going because their budget was slashed. New Jersey better get ready to welcome 9 new religious broadcasters. I got into a mild Facebook argument where the side was taken that if the public radio stations can't make it with commercials, too bad. My response was that if you look at what passes for commercial radio, you know it won't fly, we need something not geared to the lowest common denominator.

Of course, you know I'm rather pessimistic about the state of broadcasting in general.
Just remember the CR is for THIS years funding.

This budget proposal is for next year.


Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 16:19:59
REgarding the Continuing Resolution, Salon has a very good piece.

Obama's budget is irrelevant. Obama's last budget was never passed by Congress -- and that was with large Democratic majorities in both the House and Senate. This one -- at least in the form it is now -- will certainly never get passed either, now that Republicans are in firm control over the House.

The government is currently operating under the terms of a temporary "continuing resolution" that will expire on March 4. The only budget battle that matters is the fight over what kind of "compromise" the White House cuts with Republicans to get the continuing resolution extended.


Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 16:22:05
According to this, New Jersey is either looking for someone to just buy the stations and let the state keep the licenses or just buy the stations & licenses outright (valued around 4.2M total).

I don't see how they can tell someone who might buy the whole thing outright that they have to promise to provide "New Jersey-centric" programming. I suppose a religious station fills any need. Either that or they let it go for a year then flip it.

Now these are very low power stations so the operating costs for these stations are minimal, there's probably no "studio" expense per se and I'm sure for the most part the transmitter is unattended.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 02/14/2011 16:31:51
Quote by Raine:
REgarding the Continuing Resolution, Salon has a very good piece.

Obama's budget is irrelevant. Obama's last budget was never passed by Congress -- and that was with large Democratic majorities in both the House and Senate. This one -- at least in the form it is now -- will certainly never get passed either, now that Republicans are in firm control over the House.

The government is currently operating under the terms of a temporary "continuing resolution" that will expire on March 4. The only budget battle that matters is the fight over what kind of "compromise" the White House cuts with Republicans to get the continuing resolution extended.


So what does Obama capitulate on this time? Cut the UI benefit extension just approved? Another tax cut? Show them his birth certificate? Resign?

Sorry for the snark. Hate to say this but the best thing would be to let the government shutdown and maybe people remember what Newt & Friends did last time.


Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 16:39:44
Here is something Else really messed up: March, 2009.
President Obama signs continuing resolution

In light of an imminent government shut-down as result of delays in passing last year’s appropriations bills, Congress has passed and President Obama has signed a continuing resolution to maintain the prior year’s funding levels through Wednesday while negotiations continue on last year’s budget work. The Office of the Press Secretary has just issued the following bill announcement:


Comment by livingonli on 02/14/2011 16:46:47
Good morning everyone.

It's probably appropriate that my vacation ends on valentine's day.

Comment by Nina_Stratton on 02/14/2011 16:52:17
Good morning all.

I read that Salon article you posted on FB, Raine, and was moved to look up Continuing Resolutions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_resolution

I still kinda don't get it, but it refreshed my memory on what an obstructionist dick Newt Gingrich was. I think Boner is just as obstructionist, and I'm really, really, concerned.

Comment by wickedpam on 02/14/2011 16:52:31
failed Redskins quarterback Heath Schule - the former Redskins thing should have tipped them off that he would suck

Comment by livingonli on 02/14/2011 16:54:02
Quote by trojanrabbit:
According to this, New Jersey is either looking for someone to just buy the stations and let the state keep the licenses or just buy the stations & licenses outright (valued around 4.2M total).

I don't see how they can tell someone who might buy the whole thing outright that they have to promise to provide "New Jersey-centric" programming. I suppose a religious station fills any need. Either that or they let it go for a year then flip it.

Now these are very low power stations so the operating costs for these stations are minimal, there's probably no "studio" expense per se and I'm sure for the most part the transmitter is unattended.

All the NJN stations are between 88.1 and 92.1 so they can't be commercial which leaves the only options as either "religious" or something like the WNYC foundation which took over the WNYC radio stations when Ghouliani sold them. The only thing that worked out for the city was that the TV station had a commercial license which led to the failed S+ venture and that station is now our ION (formerly Pax) affiliate.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 16:56:55
Quote by Nina_Stratton:
Good morning all.

I read that Salon article you posted on FB, Raine, and was moved to look up Continuing Resolutions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_resolution

I still kinda don't get it, but it refreshed my memory on what an obstructionist dick Newt Gingrich was. I think Boner is just as obstructionist, and I'm really, really, concerned.
It's all pretty bad, We still haven't passed LAST years Budget which has been extended until MArch 4 with Continuing resolutions.

Obama had to sign a CR for FY 2009! I don;t know when the last budget was passed into law.



Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 16:57:15
And HELLO Nina!

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 17:00:13
I am pretty sure that the fiscal year ends in September.
The U.S. government's fiscal year begins on October 1 of the previous calendar year and ends on September 30 of the year with which it is numbered. Prior to 1976, the fiscal year began on July 1 and ended on June 30. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 stipulated the change to allow Congress more time to arrive at a budget each year, and provided for what is known as the "transitional quarter" from July 1, 1976 to September 30, 1976. As stated above, the tax year for a business is governed by the fiscal year it chooses.


Comment by BobR on 02/14/2011 17:05:12
Quote by Raine:
Quote by Nina_Stratton:
Good morning all.

I read that Salon article you posted on FB, Raine, and was moved to look up Continuing Resolutions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_resolution

I still kinda don't get it, but it refreshed my memory on what an obstructionist dick Newt Gingrich was. I think Boner is just as obstructionist, and I'm really, really, concerned.
It's all pretty bad, We still haven't passed LAST years Budget which has been extended until MArch 4 with Continuing resolutions.

Obama had to sign a CR for FY 2009! I don;t know when the last budget was passed into law.


I pretty much assumed that obstruction would be the name of the game for the next 2 years. I can only hope that Americans are smart and informed enough to see it for what it is.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 17:07:10
ha ha. I remember this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/87/Nydailynews_newt.jpg


Comment by Nina_Stratton on 02/14/2011 17:07:37
Howdy!

I'm reading a lot this morning - I read with particular interest a new blog (www.thepragmaticprogressive.org) post that details how China is whooping our asses on every level.

I'm very concerned about the Congressional bloodbath around the new budget. I think there are going to be a lot casualties.



Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 17:13:17
Quote by Nina_Stratton:
Howdy!

I'm reading a lot this morning - I read with particular interest a new blog (www.thepragmaticprogressive.org) post that details how China is whooping our asses on every level.

I'm very concerned about the Congressional bloodbath around the new budget. I think there are going to be a lot casualties.

ooh. I like their mission statement:
A Pragmatic Progressive understands that progressive principles will only be wishful thinking until they are adopted and implemented within a political structure; and further understands that politics is the art of the possible. As well, a Pragmatic Progressive realizes that change often comes in increments, not leaps and bounds. But over time, these increments add up to something extraordinary.


I have found a few of some 'progressives' a little too extreme for myself lately. Some, (not all, not trying to paint too broad a brush here) have become so intolerant, they sound like tea partiers.


Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 17:15:07
For example, regarding the Pell Grant issue that I mentioned earlier -- there are people that are claiming that he is just a like a republican now. /I wonder if they really knew what the plan was for the Pells -- and I wonder if they realize that the GOP would totally gut the program?





Comment by wickedpam on 02/14/2011 17:56:11
I never got a Pell Grant, though I wish I had they would have helped out on a couple of semesters.

I don't get how people can think that only the elite should go to college or get some kind of education beyond HS in whatever they want their field to be.

Comment by livingonli on 02/14/2011 18:02:35
If the GOP had their way, we would return to the economic philosophy of the Guilded Age where only the wealthy could have things and benefit and most people worked long hours for crap wages and were in poverty when they got old.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 20:42:09
Quote by wickedpam:
I never got a Pell Grant, though I wish I had they would have helped out on a couple of semesters.

I don't get how people can think that only the elite should go to college or get some kind of education beyond HS in whatever they want their field to be.
WEll that is what is interesting, the Pell grants for regular degrees are not going to be touched.

Pell grants were critical for me to go to college.


Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 20:42:34
Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 20:54:49
What happened to Randi's furbaby?
I was away for lunch.

Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 21:01:32
Ok, I got this information from her message boards:


he is really sick and the howard flew him to IOWA to find out why he is sick. he went blind and he gained lots of weight all of a sudden. she does not know what he is sick with except it could be a brain tumor.

tears all around.




Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 21:35:49
Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 21:48:50
This is amazing. It's a NYT graphic, showing every nook and cranny of Obama's 2012 Budget proposal.



Comment by Raine on 02/14/2011 22:43:42
I'm kinda losing my shit with people who claim to be progressives but are as intolerant as the fucking teabaggers.


I thought we were smarter on the damn left.