About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask A Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 04/28/2009 10:52:40

Good Morning.

Today is our 2,232nd day in Iraq.

We'll start this morning as we always do; with the latest casualty figures from Iraq and Afghanistan, courtesy of antiwar.com:

American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 4278
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03): 4139
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3817
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3419
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): 50

Other Coalition Troops - Iraq: 318
US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 679
Other Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 455
Journalists - Iraq: 139
Contractor Deaths - Iraq: 1264


We find this morning's overall cost of war passing through:

$ 850, 879, 575, 000 .00




Turning to our friends at IAVA, we find that Paul Rieckhoff has been busy; he recently made a presentation to the National Strategy Forum about our returning vets.

We've spent the past few years railing against the war and calling for our soldiers to come home. But it's not as easy as shutting down our bases and loading everyone onto a C-5 for the flight back to Westover ARB. There's thousands of regular-army troops that will simply go back to their bases in Germany and elsewhere and continue on with their military careers. But there's thousands more that put there personal lives and careers on hold for the United States....and in the ensuing months that they've been in the sandbox, the jobs they left behind have gone away.


Today, IAVA Executive Director and Founder Paul Rieckhoff gave a lecture at the National Strategy Forum in Chicago entitled "Protecting Those Who Serve: A National Security Strategy for Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan." Ahead of the troop drawdown in Iraq, Rieckhoff addressed how the U.S. government and local communities can play a role in ensuring the health, reintegration, and well-being of veterans and their families.


There's a couple of links to the conference and a White Paper on the subject over at IAVA: do go and check the link.


There are, of course, those soldiers that return in silence, draped with a US Flag. For years and years the previous administrations have banned the media from covering return ceremonies for those killed in action. President Obama recently reversed that policy, and the media is now allowed to cover the solemn rite (with family permission) as our war dead return to Dover AFB. But except for the first one after the ban was lifted, it's still not news.


DOVER AIR FORCE BASE, Delaware - It was Marine Corporal William C. Comstock's final homecoming: His remains, secured in a flag-draped "transfer case" in the rear of the cargo plane, arrived on the nearly deserted runway.

The 21-year-old supply technician from Van Buren, Ark., who died in Iraq, was met in the chilly darkness by a highly choreographed ritual. With a chaplain's prayer, and the exacting movements of an honor guard, Comstock's body was gently placed in a white truck, saluted, and driven to the mortuary.

It was the eighth arrival of a fallen service member from Iraq or Afghanistan open to media coverage under the Obama administration's new policy that permits reporters to attend if the families approve - a policy carefully constructed after pressure from First Amendment advocates and the opposition of some veterans' groups.

But Comstock's arrival almost wasn't covered. A single reporter showed up Wednesday night, along with a photographer from the Associated Press, which has recorded each ceremony on behalf of its newspaper clients around the country.

At the first arrival ceremony approved for coverage - on April 5 - 35 media outlets were on hand. Attendance has waned considerably since: The second one had 17 media representatives, according to the Air Force, and the last few have had a handful in total.

"There was some deep concern that we would have a desire for several hundred media to be there originally and we were concerned that we were going to have to say we can't accommodate [them]," Colonel Robert Edmondson, commander of the Mortuary Affairs Operations Center, said in an interview. "We were surprised that there wasn't more of a huge outpouring."

The lack of interest, however, may say more about the nation than the media. After years in which the Bush administration worried that images of returning casualties would traumatize the public, the images from Dover have had little emotional impact.

"Putting pictures of dead soldiers on the front page doesn't sell newspapers," said Ralph Begleiter, a journalism professor at the University of Delaware who sued the Defense Department in 2005 to lift the ban on media coverage, which dated from the 1991 Persian Gulf War. "When war news comes on television the ratings go down. Is it any surprise that the media chooses not to publish these events?"

Comstock's family, who could not be reached for comment, did not attend the return ceremony. His father told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that Comstock was killed by an accidental weapons discharge. The Pentagon will only say that he died in a "non-hostile incident" in Anbar Province and is investigating.

There are practical limitations to more robust media coverage. The cost-cutting media has limited resources, and the Air Force can usually provide less than a half-day's notice before a casualty arrives - making it difficult for all but nearby journalists and the national media a few hours' drive away in Washington or New York to make it.



Returning dead may not sell newspapers, but as long as the media refuses to cover it, it's all too easy to sweep it under the rug and pretend that US soldiers aren't fighting and dying for what is still a lie.



 

37 comments (Latest Comment: 04/29/2009 03:15:58 by Will in Chicago)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by BobR on 04/28/2009 12:26:04
Thanks for another great thought-provoking Ask A Vet segment.

Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 12:33:51
Morning :hug:

Comment by Raine on 04/28/2009 13:01:10
Good Morning! So excited about Ms. Mary Tyler Moore!

Comment by Scoopster on 04/28/2009 13:21:04
Morning all! Ahh another day of record heat as we quickly approach International Workers Day..



The computer geek in me is really enjoying this article today: How Time.com lost the game..

Comment by BobR on 04/28/2009 13:46:03
Quote by Scoopster:

Morning all! Ahh another day of record heat as we quickly approach International Workers Day..



The computer geek in me is really enjoying this article today: How Time.com lost the game..


So much potential wasted on such trivial pursuits

Comment by Raine on 04/28/2009 14:38:05
AJC has decided that it is more important to be "NEWSIE" than to report actual News. http://snurl.com/gx7ar



And the new editor is rather combatent in the comments section to all those reviews by actual readers. (she is the one that has the shaded response.



I am not pleased about this sad turn for the AJC.

Comment by Raine on 04/28/2009 14:55:32
MGM Mention on Momma!

Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 15:03:29
Quote by Raine:

MGM Mention on Momma!






Yeah! I miss MGM

Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 15:09:03
Rebecca! :)

Comment by m-hadley on 04/28/2009 15:43:09
Quote by wickedpam:

Rebecca! :)




Morning Everybody :D

I love it when Rebekah gets some air time :P

Cheers,

mfaye &

Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 15:57:53
O'Reilly says no one else has died since 9/11?



I think a few people died from the Antrax attack, there's a post office here named for 2 of them.



Plus there are the soliders.

Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 16:03:47
Good day everyone.



It looks like the blog is about as sleepy as I was this morning.

Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 16:08:16
So Spector is switching parties. I wonder if it has to do with the prospect of losing to a reich-wing wingnut in the primary next year that has motivated the switch.

Comment by Raine on 04/28/2009 16:17:20
HOLY CRAP! SPECTER SWITCHING PARTIES!!!!



Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter will switch his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat and announced today that he will run in 2010 as a Democrat, according to a statement he released this morning.



Specter's decision would give Democrats a 60 seat filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota. (Former Sen. Norm Coleman is appealing Franken's victory in the state Supreme Court.)



"I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary," said Specter in a statement. "I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election."



He added: "Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans."

Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 16:18:38
Don't forget today is Mrs. TriSec's birthday.

Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 16:20:21
wow, I didn't think he'd actually do it - that's just wow!

Comment by BobR on 04/28/2009 16:32:19
Quote by livingonli:

So Spector is switching parties. I wonder if it has to do with the prospect of losing to a reich-wing wingnut in the primary next year that has motivated the switch.


I think it's the prospect of losing to a Democrat in the general election that motivated the switch.

Comment by BobR on 04/28/2009 16:32:47
Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 16:36:02
Quote by BobR:

Quote by livingonli:

So Spector is switching parties. I wonder if it has to do with the prospect of losing to a reich-wing wingnut in the primary next year that has motivated the switch.


I think it's the prospect of losing to a Democrat in the general election that motivated the switch.


Maybe both. I'm sure it would have been humiliating to lose the GOP primary after 30 years to an unknown right-wing nut job.

Comment by Scoopster on 04/28/2009 16:40:49
Quote by Raine:

HOLY CRAP! SPECTER SWITCHING PARTIES!!!!



Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter will switch his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat and announced today that he will run in 2010 as a Democrat, according to a statement he released this morning.



Specter's decision would give Democrats a 60 seat filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota. (Former Sen. Norm Coleman is appealing Franken's victory in the state Supreme Court.)



"I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary," said Specter in a statement. "I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election."



He added: "Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans."


:O :O :O :O Holy kvsfjkahfhklfaoly!~

Comment by m-hadley on 04/28/2009 16:42:08
Quote by wickedpam:

O'Reilly says no one else has died since 9/11?



I think a few people died from the Antrax attack, there's a post office here named for 2 of them.



Plus there are the soliders.




Never mind over one million Iraqis, plus an undetermined number of Afghanis, and over 4000 U.S. Troops (sorry Mala, didn't mean to steal your thunder, but Billo makes me froth at the mouth :rage:)

Cheers,

mfaye & :peace:



Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 16:47:06
Quote by m-hadley:

Quote by wickedpam:

O'Reilly says no one else has died since 9/11?



I think a few people died from the Antrax attack, there's a post office here named for 2 of them.



Plus there are the soliders.




Never mind over one million Iraqis, plus an undetermined number of Afghanis, and over 4000 U.S. Troops (sorry Mala, didn't mean to steal your thunder, but Billo makes me froth at the mouth :rage:)

Cheers,

mfaye & :peace:







:hug:





You summed it up better then I did :)

Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 16:49:51
The Scruff McGruff PSA on Thom Hartmann.

Comment by wickedpam on 04/28/2009 17:39:40
You know you secretly love it :D

Comment by Will in Chicago on 04/28/2009 17:56:31
Excellent post, TriSec!



Wish Mrs. TriSec a Happy Birthday.



The news about Specter is surprising, and I wonder if the GOP will try even harder to block Franken. However, they should be worried about Collins and Snow.



As for myself, I am packing for my short move to a new place in Phoenix. So, I will be unplugging the computer a little later. I hope to back online in a few days. In the meantime, I hope that everyone will be well.

Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 18:39:53
Randi will be on XM 165 instead of 167 when she comes back meaning she will be competing with Thom Hartmann on XM this time.

Comment by livingonli on 04/28/2009 19:01:09
And now the salt mine beckons.

Comment by BobR on 04/28/2009 19:33:58
Comment by Scoopster on 04/28/2009 19:55:28


What in the hell........ :rofl:

Comment by Mondobubba on 04/28/2009 20:49:27




WTF?

Comment by trojanrabbit on 04/28/2009 22:21:07
Quote by Scoopster:

Quote by Raine:

HOLY CRAP! SPECTER SWITCHING PARTIES!!!!



Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter will switch his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat and announced today that he will run in 2010 as a Democrat, according to a statement he released this morning.



Specter's decision would give Democrats a 60 seat filibuster proof majority in the Senate assuming Democrat Al Franken is eventually sworn in as the next Senator from Minnesota. (Former Sen. Norm Coleman is appealing Franken's victory in the state Supreme Court.)



"I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary," said Specter in a statement. "I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election."



He added: "Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans."


:O :O :O :O Holy kvsfjkahfhklfaoly!~




Bah



I don't trust him as far as I can throw him. And that's not very far at all.



As long as Comcast is in his back pocket.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 04/28/2009 23:38:24
YAYYY! Mama's coming back to Boston radio....sorta



WWZN 1510



Stephanie 10AM-Noon

Ed Schultz Noon - 3PM

Thom Hartmann 3PM - 6PM



Starting Monday, May 4

Comment by BobR on 04/28/2009 23:50:06
I don't want to step on TriSec's news, but it's very good!

Comment by livingonli on 04/29/2009 01:08:20
Quote by trojanrabbit:

YAYYY! Mama's coming back to Boston radio....sorta



WWZN 1510



Stephanie 10AM-Noon

Ed Schultz Noon - 3PM

Thom Hartmann 3PM - 6PM



Starting Monday, May 4


That's XM's lineup from 10-6.

Comment by TriSec on 04/29/2009 01:15:55
Good evening, folks.



I is no longer unemployed!



Got the job I wanted, too....with a local company (3 miles from home) with decent people, in a growing and important (and virtually unknown) area of the healthcare industry.



I did not have to become a Sith; I'm still on the doctors' side!





Comment by livingonli on 04/29/2009 01:33:13
Congratulations, Tri. It looks like your luck is turning around.



Now I just hope BobR's luck can turn around and I still have to work on my own issues.



And the Caps have taken out the Rangers in the NHL playoffs.

Comment by Will in Chicago on 04/29/2009 03:15:58
CONGRATULATIONS, TRISEC!!!!!







I am glad to hear your good news.



I am going off line for the next few days. When I return, I should be in my new place. Till then, be well!