About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask a Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 01/19/2010 11:21:42

Good Morning.

Today is our 2,504th day in Iraq and our 3,026th day in Afghanistan.

We'll start this morning as we always do, with the latest casualty reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, courtesy of Antiwar.com:

American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 4373
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03): 4234
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3910
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3514
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): 145

Other Coalition Troops - Iraq: 325
US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 961
Other Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 632
Contractor Employee Deaths - Iraq: 1,395
Journalists - Iraq: 335
Academics Killed - Iraq: 431


We find this morning's cost of war passing through:

$ 950, 847, 400, 000 .00



Ya know, Senate Candidate Scott Brown (R-MA) wants to oppose the President on everything, but I'll bet this is one thing he won't have a problem voting for.




The US president plans to ask congress for an extra $33bn to fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq this year, defence officials say.

The money, mainly for the deployment of 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan and other war costs in the 2010 fiscal year, would come on top of Barack Obama's expected request to increase the Pentagon's overall budget in fiscal 2011 to a record $708bn, the officials said on condition of anonymity.

Fiscal 2010 defence department funding, including war costs in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as military construction, already comes to $660bn without the $33bn emergency funding request.

The budget for fiscal 2011, which begins on October 1, is expected to be released by the White House only next month, but military officials have suggested it would top $700bn for the first time.

Despite the proposed increase for next year, analysts say Pentagon procurement is likely to remain under pressure, and more weapons-buying programmes may be cut, because personnel and healthcare costs are taking up an increasing chunk of the overall Pentagon budget.

Vital national interest

Last week, Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he expected Pentagon funding to begin to drop within a couple years because of the country's economic woes.

Despite that, Obama and his defence secretary, Robert Gates, face a major challenge trimming even a limited number of weapons programmes over the objections of legislators who see them as a source of skilled manufacturing jobs.

After more than two months consulting military leaders, ambassadors and national security advisers in a review of US strategy in Afghanistan, Obama announced last month that he would send an extra 30,000 troops to the war.

The deployment, he said, was in the "vital national interest" of the US, and would create a situation allowing the US to start withdrawing its troops in mid-2011.

He said the additional troops "are the resources that we need to seize the initiative" and bring the eight-year long war to a "successful conclusion".

The increased deployment will increase the US military presence in Afghanistan to around 100,000.


Remember folks, thats *another* $33 billion on top of the running total you see at the top of the page. And we can't afford healthcare reform?

It all depends on the national priority. Our priority now is war and killing. I wonder if you gave voters a starker choice, what would we choose? Would we cut defense spending in favor of healthcare? Would we cut back on education, arts, infrastructure?

It all comes down to who's going to pay for it. You and me, paying an unfair tax burden, or the elites that pay the lowest tax rate of any civilized nation?

But, I digress.

That 33 billion the President wants for more war likely isn't going to help the situation in Afghanistan any. Last year was the deadliest year for Afghan civilians since the war began.




The number of civilians killed in war-related violence in Afghanistan touched 2,412 last year, the highest number since the 2001 US-led invasion, the UN has said.

A report by the UN mission for Afghanistan pointed to the "intensification and spread of the armed conflict" in what was also the deadliest year for foreign forces, with 520 troops killed.

It said 70 per cent of civilian deaths were caused by Taliban attacks, while 25 per cent were killed by pro-government and foreign forces - a 28 per cent reduction in deaths caused by Western forces since 2008.

The remaining 135 civilians were killed in violence not attributable to the conflicting parties, the UN said in its report.

'Excessive use of force'

The UN found most deaths attributed to pro-government forces were killed in air raids as well as search and seizure operations.

"These often involved excessive use of force, destruction to property and cultural insensitivity, particularly towards women," it said.

But it said that a change in Nato command structure had helped reduce the number of non-combatant deaths by coalition troops.

US General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of the foreign forces in Afghanistan, has made minimising civilian deaths and injuries a central tenet of his counter-insurgency strategy, ordering reduced air attacks as one way of achieving this objective.

The UN report said the change in Nato forces' command structure, "specific steps to minimise civilian casualties" and "a new tactical directive" by the force contributed to the reduction in non-combatant deaths.

Civilian casualties are a source of tension between the Afghan government of Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, and the international forces fighting the insurgency.

Recent incidents, such as the deaths of 10 civilians including eight teenagers in eastern Kunar province in an authorised but non-military US operation, have seen Afghans take to the streets to protest against the presence of foreign troops.



So....whether it's 59 or 60 seats, it looks like things won't be changing on the war fronts anytime soon.


 

41 comments (Latest Comment: 01/20/2010 02:56:23 by livingonli)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 13:47:06
FIRST!!!



An excellent post, TriSec!! I think that we will see little change in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq unless we, the people, increase pressure on the Obama administration and Congresss to make change happen. I have to wonder if it will, as many people are dispirited.



I hope that everyone is well and having a great day.

Comment by wickedpam on 01/19/2010 13:56:41
Morning

Comment by Scoopster on 01/19/2010 14:07:24
Mornin' all.. Hey there Will you're up early!



There was an interesting tidbit on the radio on the way in that there is almost no Al Qaeda presence left in Afghanistan (it's pretty much just Taliban) because it's all moved to Yemen and Somalia.. so sending more troops there is kinda pointless except to hold back the Taliban and simply rebuild/train the Afghanis.



On our other major news note, the reports I'm hearing have the turnout running very heavy for a special election, with women breaking to Coakley and men going for Brown.

Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 14:14:27
Quote by Scoopster:

Mornin' all.. Hey there Will you're up early!



There was an interesting tidbit on the radio on the way in that there is almost no Al Qaeda presence left in Afghanistan (it's pretty much just Taliban) because it's all moved to Yemen and Somalia.. so sending more troops there is kinda pointless except to hold back the Taliban and simply rebuild/train the Afghanis.



On our other major news note, the reports I'm hearing have the turnout running very heavy for a special election, with women breaking to Coakley and men going for Brown.




Hi, Scoopster!!



Now that I am subbing again, I am up pretty early most weekdays. So, assuming that my internet connection is working and I have time, I will be here.



This morning, I had no calls for subbing -- not surprising for the day after a holiday. So, I have some errands to run later and a lot else to do. However, I will be checking in on the blog a few times today.



Comment by wickedpam on 01/19/2010 15:45:05
God all this talk of the MA election is just depressing me even more then I've been depressed lately

Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 15:53:13
Quote by wickedpam:

God all this talk of the MA election is just depressing me even more then I've been depressed lately




It is depressing, but I think that when we have seen policies that shy away from the base of the Democratic Party, we should expect problems in elections. We should have seen health care reform start out with single payer or Medicare for all and THEN negotiate.



If Brown wins, we may see a move to end the filibuster -- and this will reduce the power of the GOP and the Blue Dog senators. Maybe it will send a wake up call to the party leadership -- but Rahm Emmanuel and others did not seem to get a wake up call in 1994.

Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 15:55:33
Lovely, I am getting nothing on WCPT in Chicago.



Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 15:58:52
Quote by Will in Chicago:

Lovely, I am getting nothing on WCPT in Chicago.





Okay, just my local FM station. (WCPT broadcasts at 820 AM, 99.9 FM (what I normally listen to), 92.7 FM in the Northern suburbs, and 92.5 FM in the Western suburbs.)

Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 16:02:39
My local FM station is back on the air.



Comment by Scoopster on 01/19/2010 16:43:56
Interesting point someone just made on the relatively small lines.. since there's only one item on the ballot, the voting itself will be going very fast!

Comment by livingonli on 01/19/2010 16:46:17
Good morning folks.



After all the hours I put in the last two days I am exhausted. The only consolation is the OT and Holiday Double Time pay I received for my 12 hours that I worked yesterday.

Comment by m-hadley on 01/19/2010 17:01:56
Quote by wickedpam:

God all this talk of the MA election is just depressing me even more then I've been depressed lately




Me too, Mala, I am feeling like I am about to be sick . Any word on the results yet? I am on pins and needles Please keep us posted on whatever you hear - thanks mucho.

Cheers,

mfaye

Comment by wickedpam on 01/19/2010 17:06:04
anyone heard from Raine & Bob about Raine's Oma?

Comment by Scoopster on 01/19/2010 17:07:17
They were hitting the road to visit her today.. it was a heart attack.

Comment by wickedpam on 01/19/2010 17:23:56
Quote by Scoopster:

They were hitting the road to visit her today.. it was a heart attack.






why did I think they were flying?

Comment by TriSec on 01/19/2010 17:25:25
Howdy folks!



Waiting tensely here at ground zero....no reports of any polling deficiencies so far, but we seem to have been spared most of the Diebold games anyway.



Too close and too early to call; things will pick up later, methinks.





Comment by livingonli on 01/19/2010 17:30:50
Are there exit polls being done in MA to insure that the voting results reflect the polls? It seems obvious that Brown would support failed Bush like policies and must be stopped.

Comment by m-hadley on 01/19/2010 17:32:36
Quote by livingonli:

Good morning folks.



After all the hours I put in the last two days I am exhausted. The only consolation is the OT and Holiday Double Time pay I received for my 12 hours that I worked yesterday.




Heya Livin, At least you get OT, all I get is lousy "comp time" :(

Hang in there

Cheers, mfaye

Comment by Scoopster on 01/19/2010 17:32:49
Quote by wickedpam:

Quote by Scoopster:

They were hitting the road to visit her today.. it was a heart attack.




why did I think they were flying?


I would think they are, at least from DC to NYC..

Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 17:33:16
TriSec, I hope that we will have some ideas soon about voter turnout. I suspect that Coakley will win if voter turnout is moderate to high.

Comment by m-hadley on 01/19/2010 17:36:27
Quote by wickedpam:

anyone heard from Raine & Bob about Raine's Oma?




OMG, I am soo out of the loop. I didn't even know anything about it. Where does she live? Please, somebody, update me - thanks mucho!



Cheers, mfaye

Comment by wickedpam on 01/19/2010 17:56:36
Quote by m-hadley:

Quote by wickedpam:

anyone heard from Raine & Bob about Raine's Oma?




OMG, I am soo out of the loop. I didn't even know anything about it. Where does she live? Please, somebody, update me - thanks mucho!



Cheers, mfaye






Late yesterday afternoon, her Oma went to the hospital. Turned out to be a heart attack, think she's in stable condition but I'm not positive. Raine and Bob are on their way to NY



keep sending positive, healing vibes that way





~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~

Comment by Random on 01/19/2010 18:31:50
Money still on the dem in Massachusetts.

Comment by livingonli on 01/19/2010 18:44:11
Hi Random. Long time no see.

Comment by Scoopster on 01/19/2010 18:54:35
Random! Howyabeen?!

Comment by wickedpam on 01/19/2010 19:44:55
Hey Random

Comment by m-hadley on 01/19/2010 20:40:09
Quote by wickedpam:

Quote by m-hadley:

Quote by wickedpam:

anyone heard from Raine & Bob about Raine's Oma?




OMG, I am soo out of the loop. I didn't even know anything about it. Where does she live? Please, somebody, update me - thanks mucho!



Cheers, mfaye










Late yesterday afternoon, her Oma went to the hospital. Turned out to be a heart attack, think she's in stable condition but I'm not positive. Raine and Bob are on their way to NY



keep sending positive, healing vibes that way





~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~




Thanks mucho Mala - I am keeping Raine & BobR in my thoughts Thanks again! mfaye



Comment by TriSec on 01/19/2010 21:12:34
Passing through again....I've been reading some of the coverage at Boston.com.



I'm actually rather sickened by the [seemingly] large number of voters that are saying that the Dems are 'too powerful' in Washington and need to 'slow down'.



But it was OK for the Repugs to railroad things through a rubber-stamp congress over the last 8 years?



How short a memory we all seem to have.



I know I did the right thing this morning, painful as it was, but if the rest of this Commonwealth doesn't follow through, then fuck them all and we all so richly deserve the fate a Republican Congress would bring to America. I've got your freakin' teabag RIGHT HERE, you misguided and ignorant voters!









Comment by Will in Chicago on 01/19/2010 22:11:12
Wishing Raine's Oma the best. Go Coakley!

Comment by trojanrabbit on 01/19/2010 22:37:04
5PM news says turnout far beyond expectations.



The blame for this falls directly in the lap of Harry Reid and his (and the rest of the "leadership's") cowardice in the handling of Lieberman. WWHDD? The first act tomorrow should be the removal of Lieberman from his chair.

Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 00:01:05
Oh yeah here's a reminder.. remember Bush's 2001 tax cuts? Passed through budget reconciliation - 51 votes onry!



Why the hell can't we do that with health care reform?

Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 00:26:07
Comment by trojanrabbit on 01/20/2010 00:58:13
Quote by Scoopster:

Oh yeah here's a reminder.. remember Bush's 2001 tax cuts? Passed through budget reconciliation - 51 votes onry!



Why the hell can't we do that with health care reform?




Because the Senate Majority Leader is (pick one or more)

a) a coward

b) a corporatist bought by the health care industry

c) a seekrit rethuglican terrist

Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 01:12:48
Comment by TriSec on 01/20/2010 01:16:12
Evening, folks.



First four returns are in....Nahant, Shrewsbury, Tyngsboro, and Bolton.



Scott is kicking Martha's ass, to the tune of better than 4-1.



Methinks this doesn't bode well.





Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 01:21:34
Coakley won Lowell big time.. that's probably the key here she needs to win the mid-sized cities. Will be interesting when the Worcester area comes in.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 01/20/2010 01:27:06
Coakley campaign HQ is dead. Doug Flutie's band is partying at Scott Brown's HQ.

Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 01:32:03
Oops.. they had Lowell reporting 94% a moment ago and now it's only reporting 9%..



On the upside, Coakley won Concord & Sudbury.

Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 01:59:12
This map is not looking happy right now..

Comment by Scoopster on 01/20/2010 02:28:37
Coakley's conceded...





Comment by livingonli on 01/20/2010 02:56:23
Quote by trojanrabbit:

Quote by Scoopster:

Oh yeah here's a reminder.. remember Bush's 2001 tax cuts? Passed through budget reconciliation - 51 votes onry!



Why the hell can't we do that with health care reform?




Because the Senate Majority Leader is (pick one or more)

a) a coward

b) a corporatist bought by the health care industry

c) a seekrit rethuglican terrist


Definitely a and b. Even Jon Stewart has pointed out how Chimpy got so much stuff passed with a much smaller majority, maybe we should have let the GOP pass their remove the veto bill so that it could have fallen back on their faces when the GOP lost control.



Although I wonder how much of this margin of victory is coming from Diebold with those pre-filled ballots.