About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

A Propensity for Puritanism
Author: BobR    Date: 01/29/2010 12:47:42

Unless you've been living under a rock lately, you've heard the news of J.D. Salinger's passing. He was most famous for his ground-breaking novel "Catcher in the Rye". Loved by most who read it, the book was controversial, not because of its ideas or philosophy, but because of the language and the topics that Holden Caufield (the story's protagonist) discussed. America was founded by Puritans, and it seems that influence has never really gone away.

The book itself was banned in numerous schools, teachers even lost their jobs for assigning it to high school students. You would think that after centuries of advancement, our society would have moved past this. Granted, this was way back in the 1970s... that's practically ancient history. We're way beyond that now, right?

Of course not. In the last few days, a California school district pulled the Merriam-Webster Dictionary from the shelves because it included the definition for Oral Sex. I don't know about you, but looking up dirty words in the dictionary was a right of passage for me as a youngster.

Another school district is also pulling an updated version of Anne Frank's auto-biography because of a "vagina passage" (no pun intended) in the book. The original version had been censored by her father; this version has restored Anne Frank's original words. Apparently, high school kids aren't supposed to know what a vagina is?

TV has faired no better. Remember the huge flap over Janet Jackson's "nipple-gate" (no pun intended). How often does someone on TV inadvertently let a "fuck" slip out, and wait nervously like a little kid to find out if they'll be slapped with a huge fine?

This knee-jerk reaction to all things sexual (no pun intended) doesn't show any signs of abating. Gay marriage? Still forbidden. Gays in the military? Still forbidden, although the military is seeing the writing on the wall. That doesn't mean they have to like it. For those that watched the SOTU speech on Wednesday, the Joint Chiefs sat stone-faced when President Obama made the declaration that plans would be put in place to end DADT. That reaction did not go unnoticed.

I have to wonder if we'll ever get over this frowny-wavy-finger reaction to anything of a sexual nature? Politicians that have affairs resign in disgrace (unless they're Republican) while it's almost accepted that politicians in Europe (hell - most everyone) has mistresses (or misters). Movies with violence - okay for kids. Movies with 5 seconds of bare boobie - rated R. It just doesn't make sense. We've (mostly) gotten past a mindset that anyone other than white males is property. Why can't we get past this?


 

27 comments (Latest Comment: 01/30/2010 00:19:07 by Scoopster)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by wickedpam on 01/29/2010 13:14:20
Morning

Comment by trojanrabbit on 01/29/2010 13:38:28
Morning all.



That was one bad commute last night. 10 minutes of absolute whiteout, leaving behind a sheet of glare ice on the road. Could feel the car slipping down the crown in the road. Saw one car overturned in a ditch and there was a 30 car pileup nearby.



Only time I could say I was glad to have a car with an automatic tranny (the wife's Volvo).

Comment by Scoopster on 01/29/2010 13:53:09
Morning all & Happy Fridee!



Picking up on Vel's comment from last night, there's been a lot of discussion on sports radio about this Focus on The Family ad.. not just the obvious question of whether the ad should be aired, but whether the audience will even be receptive or whether sticking a serious commercial in between Bob Dole pitching Viagra and the latest Bud Light pitch makes sense. Someone I heard even brought up that this kind of ad could even add fuel to a domestic violence fire caused by excessive drinking.



The most driving question though is how this could change advertising during this kind of event. Will the silliness associated with Super Bowl advertising be overtaken by serious stuff like this? In fact I'm surprised we haven't heard about the possibility of a response ad being run by NOW or Planned Parenthood.

Comment by trojanrabbit on 01/29/2010 14:08:44
I find it interesting that one of the comments I heard yesterday that this ad might only be possible because the Super Bowl ad rates dropped for the first time.

Comment by wickedpam on 01/29/2010 14:29:33
*sigh* dude there are gay and lesbian soliders in the military of other countries do they get looked upon differently? No.

Comment by Raine on 01/29/2010 14:31:31
good morning... day 3 of head cold....

Comment by wickedpam on 01/29/2010 14:55:40
Idiot.

Comment by Raine on 01/29/2010 14:56:54
OMG! This guy is off the hook!!!!

Comment by Raine on 01/29/2010 14:58:11


oh great.



Tell me again Alito how that's not true?

Comment by wickedpam on 01/29/2010 15:09:08
Quote by Raine:

OMG! This guy is off the hook!!!!






more like off his meds

Comment by wickedpam on 01/29/2010 15:25:04
dude, why do you care?

Comment by Scoopster on 01/29/2010 16:39:06
Hmmm... There's some shit going around about Pelosi using military aircraft for boozefests. Link (purported source, con-job website)

Comment by BobR on 01/29/2010 16:54:34
wow - what a busy day...





Comment by livingonli on 01/29/2010 16:55:11
Good morning everyone.. Another day nursing the sore arm. Wish this damn thing would heal already.



They're are also stories that the Saudis also now own part of Fox News. How do people like Glenn Beck feel about bowing to their Saudi masters

Comment by Scoopster on 01/29/2010 16:59:38
"No defendant should ever be convicted based on his convictions," (Roeder's Defense Atty. Mark) Rudy said.


Yes, he should be convicted on the fact that he methodically planned to kill a doctor and then carried out that act knowing what the consequences would be. And then he should be HANGED like Richard Hickock and Perry Smith were.

Comment by Scoopster on 01/29/2010 17:06:59
Thank you for doing the right thing today, Kansas.

Comment by TriSec on 01/29/2010 17:24:42
Howdy folks!



Tough being a Bostonian on this here blog today....I'll take the entire thing as an incoming brick.



But like everything else...it is what it is until it gets exploited by someone.



I've been in the medical community for a while, even got trained as an EMT. Some segments of society see sex for what it is without the hangups.



Of course, depending on who you ask, Mrs. TriSec and I don't have a *real* marriage since we couldn't procreate, but that's an argument for another day. (We keep checking though. )





Comment by livingonli on 01/29/2010 18:08:39
Marc Maron will be on John Oliver's Comedy Central stand-up show tonight at 11.

Comment by TriSec on 01/29/2010 18:54:57
Wait, Anne Frank had a vagina?



(See now, that's the real issue here. Think of some utterly routine bodily function you do every day....then think of a celebrity or historical figure doing same.)



<< mind boggles >>





Comment by BobR on 01/29/2010 19:49:20
Quote by TriSec:

Wait, Anne Frank had a vagina?



(See now, that's the real issue here. Think of some utterly routine bodily function you do every day....then think of a celebrity or historical figure doing same.)



<< mind boggles >>





You mean like Angelina Jolie sitting on the bowl, taking a big steaming dump?



(or Jennifer Anniston, if you prefer... )

Comment by Scoopster on 01/29/2010 20:41:53
girls don't poop!!

Comment by velveeta jones on 01/29/2010 22:11:11
Hello. Well, we got........... snow. snow. snow. snow. It only started about an hour ago and its around 2" already.





Comment by Scoopster on 01/29/2010 23:50:58
Comment by Raine on 01/30/2010 00:13:01


that ad will get plenty of exposure without paying the fee to CBS...

Comment by Raine on 01/30/2010 00:13:30
Quote by velveeta jones:

Hello. Well, we got........... snow. snow. snow. snow. It only started about an hour ago and its around 2" already.





Again?

Comment by Scoopster on 01/30/2010 00:19:07
Quote by Raine:



that ad will get plenty of exposure without paying the fee to CBS...


Sure it will.. but the larger point is that this business is not allowed to advertise its services, while a organization that supports misogyny, bigotry, sexual discrimination, and people who commit assault and murder is allowed to advertise its messages of hatred.