About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask A Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 11/13/2007 11:53:41

Good Morning.

Today is our 1,700th day in Iraq.

We'll start this morning as we always do, with the latest casualty figures courtesy of Antiwar.com:

American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 3860
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03): 3061
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3399
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3001
Since Election (1/31/05): 2423

Other Coalition Troops: 304
US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 465



We find this morning's Cost of War standing at :

$ 468, 232, 000, 000.00




And speaking of the cost of war, there's a story in the BBC this morning (via the Washington Post) that the cost of war is actually double what is being reported...due to 'hidden costs'.
The US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are costing nearly double the amount previously thought, according to a report set to be released by Congress.

Democrats say the wars have cost $1.5 trillion - almost twice the requested $804bn (£402bn) - because of "hidden costs", the Washington Post reports.

That figure would amount to $20,000 for a regular US family of four, it adds.

And some of the figures cited in the report were labelled speculative by funding experts, the Post says.

Among the indicators contributing to the higher cost of the conflicts are higher oil costs and payments to war veterans.

The report is expected to be presented to Congress later on Tuesday.

The Democratic authors included the costs of treating wounded veterans and mounting interest payments on money borrowed to finance the wars.

The report calculates that the campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost the average US family of four more than $20,000.

It adds that the amount could rise to $46,300 over the next decade, the Washington Post says.

The committee's Democrats estimate that treating veterans could add more than $30bn to war costs, including disability payments and lost earnings for veterans affected by post-traumatic stress disorder.

Republicans have not yet commented officially on the report.




Turning to our friends at IAVA, we find a new ad this morning calling for support of the new GI bill. It's simple in it's concept..."we can afford to send them to war,
why can't we send them to college?


In 1944, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed into law the “Servicemen’s Readjustment Act,” better known as the GI Bill. With that one signature, the President ensured that eight million combat veterans coming home from Germany and Japan would be able to afford an education. The World War Two GI Bill was the Cadillac of scholarships; it covered tuition, fees, and books, and gave veterans a living stipend while they were in school.

And it was worth every penny. A 1988 Congressional study proved that every dollar spent under the original GI Bill added seven dollars to the national economy in terms of productivity, consumer spending and tax revenue. Before I served in Iraq, I worked on Wall Street. We used to talk about ROI - “return on investment.” By any standard, the GI Bill was a good buy.

But today, we are not investing in our troops like we did after World War Two. After contributing up to $1,800 from their first military paychecks, today’s troops can receive about $45,000 towards their education. That covers only 60-70% of the average cost of four years at a public college or university, or less than two years at a typical private college. The process to get these limited benefits is complicated. Troops have to front the money to their college, and then get paid back by the government in monthly installments. No wonder only 8% of troops even use their whole GI Bill benefit.

We can do better. This year, Congress is taking action on a new GI Bill. The new bipartisan bill, originally introduced by Senator Jim Webb of Virginia, would make a college education affordable to every service member returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Senator Webb is a decorated Vietnam veteran who knows firsthand the struggles combat veterans face to rebuild their lives once they come home. He’s committed to helping those veterans - and so far, 100 Senators and Representatives have signed on to his legislation.

President Roosevelt said that the original GI Bill gave “emphatic notice to the men and women in our armed forces that the American people do not intend to let them down.”

We have an opportunity to show the same support for a new Greatest Generation. Instead of hearing about a flood of homeless Iraq veterans, we could be building a generation of leaders. This Veterans Day, you can do more for the troops than just go to a parade. Go to http://www.iava.org/demandaction and tell your representatives to make a new GI Bill their priority in 2008.

Washington politicians say they support the troops. Signing on to support a new GI Bill gives them a chance to put their money where their mouths are.



And I'm going to stop here. The power has been up and down a couple of times during the creation of this blog (Thank God for Firefox auto-recovery!) So I'm going with what we've got.



225 comments (Latest Comment: 11/14/2007 05:11:43 by Raine)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati