It was a bit of a shock over the weekend to find out that the orange pig unilaterally decided to drop several "bunker buster" bombs on Iran in an unprovoked attack. Whether or not he needed Congressional approval to do so is a matter for another discussion. For now let's just take a look at the actions themselves.
The goal here was to destroy Iran's capability to build a nuke. The "fair warning" given probably made this
fairly ineffective:
While President Trump declared that the operation “completely and totally obliterated” the sites, Iranian officials downplayed the attacks. As of publication time, it’s unclear the level of damage inflicted based on satellite imagery alone, but a CNN report published on Tuesday afternoon claims that the strikes on Iran did not destroy the country’s nuclear program and has instead only set it back by a matter of months, according to early U.S. intelligence.
If history serves as any indication, there is a chance Iran’s underground nuclear facilities could be partially or wholly intact. That’s because up until now, in the quiet arms race between concrete and bombs, the concrete has been winning.
The article goes on in great detail about the type of concrete Iran used and why it's so effective against these types of bombs. It's also quite likely that - with the advance warning -
Iran may have moved everything out of the site:
Satellite imagery shared by Amit Segal, a political analyst in Israel, showed a large convoy near the remote mountainside nuclear facility in Fordow two days before the US strike, leading to speculation that enriched uranium was being moved to a covert facility.
Naturally, after doing a Dubya-esque "Mission Accomplished" before analysts could even go other satellite imagery, etc., YamTits
was a bit unhappy when it became clear that the mission was in fact NOT accomplished:
President Donald Trump is posting through the pain after a preliminary assessment by his own intelligence community cut short his victory lap over the U.S. strikes on Iran.
A classified report leaked to CNN and The New York Times on Tuesday revealed that Trump’s much-touted attacks on three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites over the weekend did not kill the country’s nuclear program. At worst, they likely set the program back by a few months, which counters the president’s repeated claims of “complete and total obliteration.”
Naturally, he impotently rage-tweeted through the night, as presidents are wont to do

. The sting must have been extra sting-ey due to
the reason he decided to go ahead with it:
President Donald Trump apparently decided to bomb Iran and “get in on the action” Saturday after watching Fox News praise Israel for striking the country earlier this month, says New York Times reporter Helene Cooper, who cited Pentagon and Trump administration officials.
Cooper argued Monday on MSNBC’s All In With Chris Hayes that Trump previously prided himself on being a noninterventionist, and said he maintained an “America First” perspective even after Israel attacked Iran on June 13, but that a shift occurred the very next day.
“One official told me that it started as early as the next morning when President Trump woke up and watched Fox News and started to see how well Israel was being presented as doing,” Cooper, who also spoke with U.S. military and Pentagon officials, said Monday.
So this was all an ego-fix for him? Color me shocked (more

). Putting this all together, the tangerine cockwomble - who's been firing the federal workforce with the supposed rationale of cutting costs - blew millions of dollars in a failed action that could've gotten us into WWIII because of his fragile ego?
Pathetic... but then we all know he is.