About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Latest Entries

Actions Menu

Blog Roll

Other Links

Most of these are not my words, Some are.
Author: Raine    Date: 03/22/2017 16:54:35

The following is a thread from a person I follow on twitter. Here is the thread. Please stay to the end for my words.









(OSINT: Open Source Intelligence)







Link to tweet referenced:






























(DIRCIA:Director CIA)









vv this tweet is important going forward vv

























































When I was watching the hearing on Monday, Nunes practically begged Comey to investigate Clinton. Nunes did indeed try to defend Trump during that hearing, I noted it in our TUTN Chat. You can see it here where Nunes interrupts Rep. Crawfords line of questioning (which was to allude that the GOP Party Platform had not become more Pro-Russian, in spite of evidence to the contrary) to not only deny the GOP party platform changing, he is pleading for the FBI to understand that none of it was valid.

So in light of the twitter thread above, Representative Nunes, Right in the middle of this hearing, was trying to influence the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign Ties to Russia.



It's only Wednesday.

&

Raine



 

 

 
 
 

28 comments (Latest Comment: 03/22/2017 22:02:06 by Raine)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 13:29:52
good morning!

Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 13:34:56
From the Wall Street Journal OP ED PAGE!!!





Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 13:39:32
Well, seems legit.

The White House’s former top national security official did not sign an ethics pledge ostensibly required of all Trump administration appointees barring them from ethically questionable lobbying activities, The Daily Beast has learned.

A spokesman for former National Security Adviser Mike Flynn confirmed on Tuesday that Flynn did not sign the pledge during his brief tenure.

The pledge, imposed by executive order a week after President Donald Trump took office, bars all federal appointees from lobbying their former colleagues for five years after leaving the administration and bans them from lobbying on behalf of foreign governments for life.


Comment by wickedpam on 03/22/2017 13:40:11
Morning

Comment by Mondobubba on 03/22/2017 13:42:47
Quote by Raine:
From the Wall Street Journal OP ED PAGE!!!






Wow.


Comment by wickedpam on 03/22/2017 13:44:38


Its the only one that would want him and not get backlash.

I've know a couple of people who from there, I value their diploma as much as I value packing peanuts, its there to may be protect an item but in the end isn't qualified for the job and then clings to you desperately while you try to throw it into recycling.


Comment by trojanrabbit on 03/22/2017 13:52:14
Morning awl

Comment by Scoopster on 03/22/2017 14:01:46
Mornin' all..

Here is my condition for Trump's surrender. Japanese-style public shaming and apology. Ex.:



Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 14:37:53
UNCLE JOE!!





Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 14:41:43
Dershowitz described having dinner at Trump’s private club where no policy is supposed to be discussed, “Then we schmoozed about a range of issues, the travel ban, the Supreme Court. Then he went and had dinner, and then he came back at the end of dinner just to say goodbye, and then he hung out again for about another ten or fifteen minutes schmoozing about a range of issues talking about the media talking about the leaks of information coming out about classified material.”

According to Dershowitz, the president took him aside and had a private conversation about a foreign issue. Dershowitz said, “We really talked about substantive issues of his choosing.”

What Dershowitz described contradicts a written statement from White House that Trump, “has not and will not be discussing policy with club members.”

Woah.

Audio at the link.

Comment by Will in Chicago on 03/22/2017 14:44:54
Good morning, bloggers!!!!

I think that Democrats should state that there is no vote on Gorsuch during the FBI investigation of the Trump administration. (I would say no vote period, as Mitch McConnell corrupted the process. However, I do not think that the Democrats are going to do this.)

Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 14:55:46
The house of Pariament is on lockdown.

Sounds like someone came in with a knife and shots havce been fired.

Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 14:58:54




Comment by Will in Chicago on 03/22/2017 14:59:57
From the BBC: Reports of shots fired outside Parliament.

here are reports of shots being fired outside the Houses of Parliament and the Palace of Westminster is reportedly in lockdown.

Politicians and journalists have tweeted about hearing loud crashes outside the buildings,

Witnesses also said they saw people being treated for injuries.

Witnesses have reported seeing a man with a knife within the palace grounds.

A police officer has also told the BBC's political editor Laura Kuenssberg that someone has been shot outside Portcullis House.


Normally, I would not post an entire article. This is not a normal situation.


Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 15:00:18



Comment by TriSec on 03/22/2017 15:24:18
But - I thought Trump was going to make the trains run on time?

Comment by wickedpam on 03/22/2017 15:26:28
Quote by TriSec:
But - I thought Trump was going to make the trains run on time?



Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 16:59:38
BLOG POSTED




Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 17:59:49
Spicer is bitching that Nunes talked to the press and didn;t brief the Admin!

and WRT the blog, Nunes is going to brief the Admin about that denial that he didn't know PAge et all.

Comment by wickedpam on 03/22/2017 18:08:44
So much shadiness!

Comment by Scoopster on 03/22/2017 18:15:24
SCOTUS provides the clearest, UNANIMOUS reasoning why Gorsuch is unfit for a seat on that court - his 'strict interpretation' is extremely skewed.

"Of course this describes a general standard, not a formula. But whatever else can be said about it, this standard is markedly more demanding than the “merely more than de minimis” test applied by the Tenth Circuit. It cannot be the case that the Act typically aims for grade-level advancement for children with disabilities who can be educated in the regular classroom, but is satisfied with barely more than de minimis progress for those who cannot.
When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing “merely more than de minimis” progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all. For children with disabilities, receiving instruction that aims so low would be tantamount to “sitting idly . . . awaiting the time when they were old enough to ‘drop out.’” Rowley, 458 U. S., at 179 (some internal quotation marks omitted). The IDEA demands more. It requires an educational program reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances."

- CJ John Roberts, opinion of the Court, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District


Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 19:11:35
Quote by wickedpam:
So much shadiness!

at a minimum.


Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 19:13:52
Will edit this to the blog post:



Comment by Mondobubba on 03/22/2017 19:41:58
Comment by Raine on 03/22/2017 22:02:06
Ahem. (as in BIG COUGH!)




Show All

Rev 3.7; Copyright � 2007-2017 by BobberBlogs�