-
It's that time of year again - our ISP is asking for money. If you have some spare change, please click the Donate link... Thanks!
- About Us
- Search
- Need Help?
- Donate
- Login/Register
Latest Entries
Actions Menu
Blog Roll
- 4F Facebook Page
- Turn Up The Night with Kenny Pick
- Stephanie Miller Show
- The Tim Corrimal Show
- The Rachel Maddow Show
- Angry Americans with Paul Rieckhoff
- Thom Hartmann Program
- Turnips! Fans of Turn Up the Night Facebook Page
- Snopes.com
- Factcheck.org
- Official White House Page, if you must.
- The Brad Blog / Green News Report
- The Poorly Written Political Blog (Joe Santorsa)
Country First? Why is that familiar?
Author: TriSec
Date: 09/04/2008 10:45:16
Good Morning!
Have you been keeping up with our friends in Minneapolis? There's been a lot of interesting things happening up there in the Twin Cities.
I believe I have seen a whopping two persons of color on the convention floor....Mondo has observed the automated nature of the applause from the delegates, but "their eyes are empty" as if responding by rote, without any passion or conviction.
I'm impressed by the number of hand-painted signs; I don't know if this is the norm for the convention, but I don't recall seeing that at the DNC in Denver...it really makes this convention look like a bunch of low-budget amateurs.
And nevermind that "deer in the headlights" speech from Governor Palin last night....I don't recall ever hearing such a disjointed and unprofessional speech from a major candidate. And they speak of Obama's lack of experience...
But the thing that I have noticed the most is all of those "Country First" signs. I'm finding it vaguely unsettling. Much has been made about Obama giving a speech in a stadium to cap the convention, and of course comparisons were made to certain rallies that took place in Europe in the 1930s. But isn't sacrificing everything on the altar of the state one of the hallmarks of fascism? I know we're all familiar with it, but a brief review of the 14 characteristics of Fascism is in order. How much of this have we seen so far this week?
But that's not what motivated me to check the history books. Sometimes being a WWII geek has it's uses; today is one of those times. After Germany invaded Poland, and the major powers declared war, the United States chose to sit on the sidelines. During 1940 and most of 1941, the so-called "Great Debate" took place over whether or not the US should become involved. Complicating matters was FDR's campaign for the presidency, which was for an unprecedented 3rd term. Many saw him as a warmonger desperate to drive the US to war; others were looking for the slightest excuse to get the US involved.
It's not like there wasn't opportunity; after the Atlantic Charter in 1941, US Destroyers began escorting ships bound for England, and U-Boats began hunting them. Of course we all know Pearl Harbor ended the debate once and for all.
But at last that brings me to the history I was searching for....for there was an antiwar group called the America First Committee. They too thought the United States should come first, but for different reasons. Their charter was remarkably brief, to whit:
Alas....the group turned out to be anti-semitic, but that's a blog entry for another day.
The funny thing is, the America First Committe lives on today. The name was resurrected in 2002 as an isolationist third party. They're tiny; balloting in only two states (MA and FL), but they do have an interesting platform.
I've got to hand it to the GOP leadership, as once again they've taken a theme or an idea that they like the sound of, without checking to see if somebody else might be using the name, or if it has any historical implications.
Have you been keeping up with our friends in Minneapolis? There's been a lot of interesting things happening up there in the Twin Cities.
I believe I have seen a whopping two persons of color on the convention floor....Mondo has observed the automated nature of the applause from the delegates, but "their eyes are empty" as if responding by rote, without any passion or conviction.
I'm impressed by the number of hand-painted signs; I don't know if this is the norm for the convention, but I don't recall seeing that at the DNC in Denver...it really makes this convention look like a bunch of low-budget amateurs.
And nevermind that "deer in the headlights" speech from Governor Palin last night....I don't recall ever hearing such a disjointed and unprofessional speech from a major candidate. And they speak of Obama's lack of experience...
But the thing that I have noticed the most is all of those "Country First" signs. I'm finding it vaguely unsettling. Much has been made about Obama giving a speech in a stadium to cap the convention, and of course comparisons were made to certain rallies that took place in Europe in the 1930s. But isn't sacrificing everything on the altar of the state one of the hallmarks of fascism? I know we're all familiar with it, but a brief review of the 14 characteristics of Fascism is in order. How much of this have we seen so far this week?
-Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
-Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
-Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
-Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
-Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
-Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
But that's not what motivated me to check the history books. Sometimes being a WWII geek has it's uses; today is one of those times. After Germany invaded Poland, and the major powers declared war, the United States chose to sit on the sidelines. During 1940 and most of 1941, the so-called "Great Debate" took place over whether or not the US should become involved. Complicating matters was FDR's campaign for the presidency, which was for an unprecedented 3rd term. Many saw him as a warmonger desperate to drive the US to war; others were looking for the slightest excuse to get the US involved.
It's not like there wasn't opportunity; after the Atlantic Charter in 1941, US Destroyers began escorting ships bound for England, and U-Boats began hunting them. Of course we all know Pearl Harbor ended the debate once and for all.
But at last that brings me to the history I was searching for....for there was an antiwar group called the America First Committee. They too thought the United States should come first, but for different reasons. Their charter was remarkably brief, to whit:
-The United States must build an impregnable defense for America.
-No foreign power, nor group of powers, can successfully attack a prepared America.
-American democracy can be preserved only by keeping out of the European war.
-"Aid short of war" weakens national defense at home and threatens to involve America in war abroad.
Alas....the group turned out to be anti-semitic, but that's a blog entry for another day.
The funny thing is, the America First Committe lives on today. The name was resurrected in 2002 as an isolationist third party. They're tiny; balloting in only two states (MA and FL), but they do have an interesting platform.
Smaller federal government
The party seeks to eliminate several Cabinet departments within the Executive branch of the U.S. federal government, such as the departments of Housing and Urban Development and Education. The party also seeks to eliminate all federal funding for schools, believing that federal government money has led to more federal control over schools -- control, the party believes, that should rest in the hands of local governments.
Church/State issues
The party opposes the idea that the Constitution bars expressions of religious faith in the public square. It seeks to overturn all bans on organized prayer in public places, especially in public schools, as well as bans on displays of religious icons (such as tablets of the Ten Commandments)
I've got to hand it to the GOP leadership, as once again they've taken a theme or an idea that they like the sound of, without checking to see if somebody else might be using the name, or if it has any historical implications.
