About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

What Would You Do With Mitt's $?
Author: velveeta jones    Date: 06/17/2012 13:15:57

Mitt Romney is one super rich motherfucker! There is just no way around it; he can't keep trying to act like "Joe Regular-guy" with his $250 Givenchy jeans. No one buys the act. And it doesn't help that he doesn't know how to speak like a commoner:
"I mean, I, figured he had to be in sport, but he wasn't in sport.", well laaa-deeee-da! Mr. Fancy Pants who knows which fork to use at a fancy dinner.
Continue reading...

3 comments (Latest Comment: 06/17/2012 23:27:20 by AuntAzalea)

ACA and my job
Author: TriSec    Date: 06/16/2012 11:45:46

Good Morning!

A fine weekend in New England in the offing....one of those that would make suffering through all those sub-zero snow days last winter worth it, if we had any.

We're up a little bit early today, since some genius at the soccer league scheduled a game for stupid o'clock, instead of in the afternoon sun like we've been all season, but I digress.
Continue reading...

1 comments (Latest Comment: 06/17/2012 01:21:48 by Will in Chicago)

It's In the Cards
Author: BobR    Date: 06/15/2012 13:18:50

Looking back over the last 10+ years, it's easy to see Sept. 11, 2001 as a turning point in America's history in so many ways. The phrase popularized during the Bush Administration that "9/11 changed everything" as an excuse for fascist-style excess was aggravating as we watched jingoism replace thought, and terrorism become the focus of any and all political discussion. We make jokes about the phrase, but it has actually proven to be quite true.

A lot has faded since then, such as "Freedom Fries" and people pouring out French wine, the rash of "patriotic" claptrap such as yellow ribbon magnets "We Stand United" decals (and why was it changed from "United We Stand"? I blame Yoda), as well as the accusatory "I support the troops - do YOU support the troops??" Someday, there will be a museum exhibit at the Smithsonian, with a sober analysis of how America essentially lost its mind.
Continue reading...

42 comments (Latest Comment: 06/16/2012 01:20:20 by TriSec)

A Day of Observance
Author: Raine    Date: 06/14/2012 13:05:10

June 14, is Flag day, according to history.com:
Continue reading...

34 comments (Latest Comment: 06/14/2012 20:58:45 by Raine)

No Surprises
Author: BobR    Date: 06/13/2012 12:52:32

Another Tuesday, another primary day... what have we learned? Mostly, we learned that despite the noise about replacing incumbents or making big changes, the results show that voters selected the candidates that seemed to reflect what we already knew about them.
Continue reading...

73 comments (Latest Comment: 06/14/2012 00:16:25 by BobR)

Ask a Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 06/12/2012 10:16:21

Good Morning.

Today is our 3,901st day in Afghanistan.

We'll start this morning as we always do; with the latest casualty figures from our ongoing war, courtesy of Antiwar.com:

US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 2,003
Other Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 1,037

We find this morning's Cost of War passing through:

$ 1, 341, 576, 800, 000 .00

Continue reading...

50 comments (Latest Comment: 06/12/2012 22:08:10 by Mondobubba)

Romney: Master of Delusion?
Author: Raine    Date: 06/11/2012 14:26:25

It is unclear who Romney thinks he’s running against, but it is clear that he is not running against President Obama. At least, he’s not running against “IRL” President Obama. Mitt Romney is running against a strawman, all the while erecting strawmen and promptly setting them on fire.
This is an excerpt from a post made by Angry Black lady at Raw Story. The entire post is worth a read, but this statement stuck with me.

Mitt Romney is campaigning against a fictional version of President Obama. It's not just spinning what is being said, it's literally running against someone who doesn't exist. Often when when debating (on the internet or in real life), it is easy to encounter what is known as a strawman argument. According to wiki, A straw man is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position. A simple example:
Continue reading...

60 comments (Latest Comment: 06/12/2012 00:17:38 by Raine)

11 Things for Ron Paul
Author: velveeta jones    Date: 06/10/2012 13:13:57

No?
Is he really giving up? Is there really only one clown in the clown car now?
This is such disappointing news, frankly I think he should disown that Rand Paul. Take him right out of the will and get back into the race. And herewith, I present some ideas for him to get some media attention, since that seemed to be his problem; no one was paying attention to him anymore. He is like that sad little man that lives up the street that you suspect goes through the trash bins in the neighborhood while everyone is asleep.

So here ya go Ron.
Continue reading...

11 comments (Latest Comment: 06/11/2012 14:36:59 by Will in Chicago)

Poisoning the Gulf - for 8 years.
Author: TriSec    Date: 06/09/2012 12:49:32

Good Morning.

It's interesting that Bob would write about the "tipping point" yesterday. I have some things I've been gathering for a while, and I had a catalyst this week to finally string it all together.

I want you to think of the cleanest, purest, most pristine state out of all 50. Does Alaska come to mind? How about Montana, or even North Dakota?

North Dakota might be one of those quirky states in the Midwest. It's definitely "flyover" country, and maybe those of us on the coasts really have no idea what goes on out there other than what we saw in 'Fargo'.

But our insatiable needs have sullied parts of the state. While some are driving home truckfulls of money, others are affected by pollution and hardship brought on by hydraulic fracturing.
Continue reading...

3 comments (Latest Comment: 06/10/2012 00:43:30 by BobR)

The Tipping Point
Author: BobR    Date: 06/08/2012 12:53:45

There are many issues that divide Republicans and Democrats (or Liberals and Conservatives), but one of the more contentious areas is the growing problem of global warming. Despite overwhelming evidence and the vast majority of climate scientists agreement, the conservatives just don't seem to want to conserve nature (despite Nixon creating the EPA). They think there's some environmental "agenda" beyond actually trying to protect the planet. In reality, they don't want to have to change, especially if it means losing money for their supporters (ie: oil companies). It is their adherance to the status quo and marketing to their constituents that has stymied progress on reducing man's impact.
Continue reading...

46 comments (Latest Comment: 06/09/2012 03:54:09 by Will in Chicago)

<<  445  446  447  448  449  450  >>
Order by most recent comment   Complete Blog Entry List