About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask a Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 10/22/2019 09:47:19

Good Morning.

Protests come in many forms - some more subtle than others.

https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/VIzZmSdPwlv_NpcygJQIqhECdzo=/1200x0/filters:quality(100)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/RTZ75MNL2ZHI3CHLMS77CPB2IM.jpg





A picture of a U.S. soldier withdrawing from Syria sporting a patch of a controversial Kurdish militia group known as the YPJ has been making the rounds across social media.

The YPJ is the women’s unit of the YPG, or People’s Protection Units — the Kurdish group considered a terrorist organization by Turkey, but has been a staunch partner of the U.S.-led effort to defeat ISIS in Syria.

It’s common for U.S. special operators to don patches of partner forces. But in 2016, American military commanders banned the wear of YPG and YPJ patches after Turkey became outraged following the circulation of photos of American commandos brandishing the patches.

“Wearing those YPG patches was unauthorized, and it was inappropriate and corrective action has been taken,” then-Army Col. Steve Warren, a Baghdad-based spokesman, told reporters in May 2016. “And we have communicated as much to our military partners and our military allies in the region.”

Neither officials with Operation Inherent Resolve — the U.S.-led mission to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria — nor officials with the Department of Defense responded to a Military Times’ query regarding whether the YPG/YPJ patches were still unauthorized.

As American convoys began to meander their way through Syria on Sunday, Agence France-Presse photographer Delil Souleiman snapped a photograph of a U.S. service member in the turret of an armored vehicle wearing the YPJ patch.

Commentators on social media quickly remarked that the U.S. soldier was showing solidarity or camaraderie with the U.S.-backed Kurdish partner force.


If our troops no longer respect the Commander-in-chief, can preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States be far behind?

But then again, once the military is in a place, we never truly leave, do we?


KABUL, Afghanistan — The U.S. may leave some forces in Syria to secure oil fields and make sure they don’t fall into the hands of a resurgent Islamic State, Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Monday, even though President Donald Trump has insisted he is pulling troops out of the country and getting out of “endless wars.”

The Pentagon chief said the plan was still in the discussion phase and had not yet been presented to Trump, who has repeatedly said the Islamic State has been defeated.

Esper emphasized that the proposal to leave a small number of troops in eastern Syria was intended to give the president “maneuver room” and wasn’t final.

“There has been a discussion about possibly doing it,” Esper told a press conference in Afghanistan before heading to Saudi Arabia. “There has been no decision with regard to numbers or anything like that.”

Still, the fact that such a plan was under consideration was another sign the administration was still trying to sort out its overall strategy amid fierce criticism from the president’s Republican allies of his abrupt decision to pull U.S. forces back — essentially clearing the way for Turkey’s military incursion into the border region to push back the American-allied Kurdish forces.

A White House official said GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham raised the issue of keeping U.S. forces in eastern Syria to protect the oil fields and that Trump supported the idea. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal discussions.


It's always about the oil, isn't it?

But now we'll shift gears - something for the WWII buffs broke over the weekend. A deep-sea research time has found the Japanese carrier Akagi - right where we put it, on the bottom of the Pacific near Midway.


MIDWAY ATOLL, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands — A crew of deep-sea explorers and historians looking for lost World War II warships have found a second Japanese aircraft carrier that went down in the historic Battle of Midway.

Vulcan Inc.'s director of undersea operations Rob Kraft and Naval History and Heritage Command historian Frank Thompson reviewed high frequency sonar images of the warship Sunday and say that its dimensions and location mean it has to be the carrier Akagi.

The Akagi was found in the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument resting in nearly 18,000 feet (5,490 meters) of water more than 1,300 miles (2,090 kilometers) northwest of Pearl Harbor.

The researchers used an autonomous underwater vehicle, or AUV, equipped with sonar to find the ship. The vehicle had been out overnight collecting data, and the image of a warship appeared in the first set of readings Sunday morning.


And despite my being somewhat flip, it is certainly an honourable war grave; no different to Japan than the USS Arizona is to us.


 
 

22 comments (Latest Comment: 10/22/2019 20:00:26 by Raine)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by wickedpam on 10/22/2019 13:24:47
Morning

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 13:34:38
good Morning.

Comment by Scoopster on 10/22/2019 13:36:47
Mornin' all!



Comment by Scoopster on 10/22/2019 14:01:41
SHIT... I forgot to hit the power switch on my new wireless mouse before I left for work. Now the batteries are gonna die.

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 14:19:33
Quote by Scoopster:
Mornin' all!


Perfect comeback.

Comment by livingonli on 10/22/2019 14:27:35
Good morning.

Comment by Scoopster on 10/22/2019 14:41:43
A summary of yesteday's Canadian federal elections:

- Justin Trudeau and the Liberals retain control, however they'll need to form a coalition government this time as they didn't reach the 170-seat threshold (currently 157 with one seat still undeclared).
- The Conservatives actually finished first in popular vote, but second in seats won with 121. They swept all seats in Saskachewan and all but one in Alberta.
- The Bloc Quebecois is back - or did they ever really go away? The BQ finished third, with many of their 32 seats coming from the NDP and a few from the Libs.
- Whoa, the Greens actually won a seat outside of British Columbia!
- And finally the best news of the night, whackjob neo-nazi Maxime Bernier lost his seat.

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 14:44:28
OMFG.






Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 14:46:27
Quote by Raine:
OMFG.











Comment by BobR on 10/22/2019 14:53:47
Quote by Scoopster:
SHIT... I forgot to hit the power switch on my new wireless mouse before I left for work. Now the batteries are gonna die.

Mine quickly goes to sleep when it's not being used. I leave it on all the time, and the batteries last for months

Comment by livingonli on 10/22/2019 14:55:22
Quote by Scoopster:
A summary of yesteday's Canadian federal elections:

- Justin Trudeau and the Liberals retain control, however they'll need to form a coalition government this time as they didn't reach the 170-seat threshold (currently 157 with one seat still undeclared).
- The Conservatives actually finished first in popular vote, but second in seats won with 121. They swept all seats in Saskachewan and all but one in Alberta.
- The Bloc Quebecois is back - or did they ever really go away? The BQ finished third, with many of their 32 seats coming from the NDP and a few from the Libs.
- Whoa, the Greens actually won a seat outside of British Columbia!
- And finally the best news of the night, whackjob neo-nazi Maxime Bernier lost his seat.

I guess it's take the small victories. Now, if there was only a way to get rid of Doug Ford and his thuggish clowns in Ontario.

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 15:24:10
YES!





Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 16:50:10




Comment by BobR on 10/22/2019 17:18:43
I missed this yesterday. Apparently, the SCOTUS thinks the courts have no jurisdiction in resolving gerrymandering disputes.

Please tell me I am misinterpreting this.

Comment by Scoopster on 10/22/2019 17:27:33
Quote by BobR:
I missed this yesterday. Apparently, the SCOTUS thinks the courts have no jurisdiction in resolving gerrymandering disputes.

Please tell me I am misinterpreting this.

That's exactly it - SCOTUS basically said "not the federal court's job" and kicked the lawsuit out. It has to go thru state court. However Michigan passed a referendum to have an independent redistricting commission put in place, so the point will end up being moot.

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 17:50:51




Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 18:27:23
I think he's losing the Turtle....






Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 18:28:15
Man-o-Man.

the reporting on this Taylor Testimony promises to be epic if all of these *Sources* are correct.

Comment by Scoopster on 10/22/2019 19:37:25
Quote by Raine:
Man-o-Man.

the reporting on this Taylor Testimony promises to be epic if all of these *Sources* are correct.

Sondland just got caught in traffic holding his pecker. He's going to jail too.

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 20:00:03
Quote by Raine:
Man-o-Man.

the reporting on this Taylor Testimony promises to be epic if all of these *Sources* are correct.

here we go:

Breaking NYT.

Comment by Raine on 10/22/2019 20:00:26
Quote by Scoopster:
Quote by Raine:
Man-o-Man.

the reporting on this Taylor Testimony promises to be epic if all of these *Sources* are correct.

Sondland just got caught in traffic holding his pecker. He's going to jail too.

YASssiree