About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Ask a Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 05/18/2010 10:21:45

Good Morning.

Today is our 2,617th day in Iraq and our 3,14554 day in Afghanistan.

We'll start this morning as we always do, with the latest casualty figures from our ongoing wars, courtesy of Antiwar.com:

American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 4397
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03): 4258
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3935
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3538
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): 169

Other Coalition Troops - Iraq: 318
US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 1,070
Other Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 693
Contractor Employee Deaths - Iraq: 1,457
Journalists - Iraq: 338
Academics Killed - Iraq: 437

We find this morning's cost of war passing through:

$ 995, 440, 500, 000 . 00



Speaking of the Cost of War, a curious thing happened over the past week. Spending in Afghanistan is now outpacing spending in Iraq.




WASHINGTON - The monthly cost of the war in Afghanistan, driven by troop increases and fighting on difficult terrain, has topped Iraq costs for the first time since 2003 and shows no sign of letting up.

Pentagon spending in February, the most recent month available, was $6.7 billion in Afghanistan compared with $5.5 billion in Iraq. As recently as fiscal year 2008, Iraq was three times as expensive; in 2009, it was twice as costly.

The shift is occurring because the Pentagon is adding troops in Afghanistan and withdrawing them from Iraq. And it's happening as the cumulative cost of the two wars surpasses $1 trillion, including spending for veterans and foreign aid. Those costs could put increased pressure on President Obama and Congress, given the nation's $12.9 trillion debt.

"The overall costs are a function, in part, of the number of troops," says Linda Bilmes, an expert on wartime spending at Harvard University. "The costs are also a result of the intensity of operations, and the number of different places that we have our troops deployed."

Obama made clear Wednesday that the U.S. role in Afghanistan would remain long after troops are withdrawn, a process planned to begin in July 2011. "This is a long-term partnership," he said during a news conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.



But instead of staying overseas today, we'll take a look at our own shores. I'm sure most of you are following the oil with increasing alarm. While I think the US Navy should chase off BP and take over the leak and cap the damn thing already, there's far more military involved in the cleanup onshore. If you listened to Momma on Friday, you heard Fridays with Fugelsang and a very brief snippet about our troops still ashore in Haiti. Much of the military's humanitarian work goes unnoticed; but it's perhaps the most important mission of all. In Louisiana, the National Guard is working hard to protect their own backyards.


WASHINGTON (Army News Service, May 7, 2010) -- Louisiana National Guard Soldiers built a 300-foot floating pier to help block an oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico from reaching the Louisiana coastline.

Soldiers of the Multi-Role Bridge Company, 205th Engineer Battalion, launched bridge erection boats and float ribbon bridge sets Thursday at Campo's Marina in St. Bernard, La. The new facilities will allow commercial vessels to quickly load protective booms to place along the coastline.

Lt. Col. Danny Bordelon, engineering task force commander, explained that the floating dock is necessary because the area of operations is very tight and shallow. Due to the shallow water, commercial vessels are not able to access the commercial pier. The 300 feet of floating dock will allow four commercial vessels to load booms at the same time.

"The Soldiers are doing an excellent job and are very motivated to help out," said Bordelon.

Local St. Barnard Parish officials requested assistance from the National Guard to construct the 300-foot floating pier to aid in the distribution of booms and supplies.

The Soldiers are also assisting in the loading of booms onto ships, providing logistical and command and control support, providing security, transporting booms from Mobile, Ala., and providing aerial reconnaissance for government officials, Bordelon said.

"We are here as long as we need to be," he said.



But there's more...the Admiral in charge, one Thad Allen, has quickly and quietly established a confident leadership and solid plan of action. Perhaps you might remember the name, as he's had some experience in this area. (literally.) Adm. Allen was once tapped by "President" Bush to restore confidence after Katrina.


WASHINGTON — When President Obama looked for a person to head up the federal response to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, he turned to a man who already had a major crisis on his résumé.

The Coast Guard commandant, Adm. Thad Allen, hasn't generated a lot of headlines over the years, but his supporters say his quiet leadership quickly restored confidence in the government's response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

"He performed magnificently in a crisis," said Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "Nobody could have done it better."

Mullen and other colleagues of Allen said he was an obvious choice to oversee the federal response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Before Katrina, Allen was not a household name.

He was thrust into the media glare when he was named to replace Michael Brown, the Federal Emergency Management Agency director who was widely criticized for the government's sluggish response in the hurricane's aftermath.

Working amid chaotic conditions, his colleagues say, Allen's understated style was key to his success. "He holds his temper well," said Gil Jamieson, a former Homeland Security official who was Allen's deputy during Katrina.

His public personality stood in stark contrast to that of Lt. Gen. Russell Honoré, the colorful, cigar-chomping Army officer who worked alongside Allen, heading up the military response.

Allen "was tough and firm," Jamieson said.

The son of a senior career enlisted Coast Guardsman, Allen, 61, has spent almost four decades in the service and was appointed commandant in 2006.

He will still step down as commandant this month, as planned, and then will retire from the service this summer, said Cmdr. Martha LaGuardia-Kotite, a Coast Guard spokeswoman.

Mullen said Allen has the leadership skills and technical knowledge to effectively manage the spill.

"The sea services have been around oil spills our whole lives," Mullen said.

Mullen said he first encountered Allen during a meeting when the two served as budget officials in their respective services almost 10 years ago.

"He left the office, and I said, 'That's got to be the next commandant of the Coast Guard,' " Mullen said.



So....even though it's the wars the get the headlines, there's far more that our troops are doing. This is the true measure of the United States....not how easily we can destroy something, but how easily we can marshall the resources to save something.

If only the differently-winged got that.

 

41 comments (Latest Comment: 05/18/2010 19:54:47 by Scoopster)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati