About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Change is in the Air.
Author: Raine    Date: 06/15/2009 12:36:23

Iran is in a state of turmoil right now. The state media and Ahmadinejad have declared victory, but - well you see, it seems as those results are being highly disputed. It is heartbreaking to see what is happening over there right now.
Continue reading...

86 comments (Latest Comment: 06/16/2009 03:14:36 by livingonli)

We Have no Sense of Humor!
Author: velveeta jones    Date: 06/14/2009 13:23:24

"You liberals just don't know how to tell a joke", I heard recently from a fellow blogger/acquaintance. "That's why Letterman is in such truouble". I really did not know how to respond to this, especially on the heels of yesterdays news from SC about a GOP activist and former State Senator who likened Michelle Obama to an ape.

Yes, it seems Mr. Rusty DePass, friend of comedian George W. Bush, made this witty retort in the comments on one of his FaceBook friends after the friend had posted an update on an escaped ape from the zoo: "I’m sure it’s just one of Michelle’s ancestors — probably harmless,” DePass mused.
Continue reading...

11 comments (Latest Comment: 06/15/2009 01:42:29 by Raine)

The Day After....and other news
Author: TriSec    Date: 06/13/2009 12:13:03

Good Morning!

Well, the elections have come to a close in Iran and naturally there's a disputed result. According to the official state media (funny how that works) the incumbent Ahmedinijad has won in a landslide victory with 62% of the vote. Given the intense coverage and speculation leading up to the election, many in Iran are disappointed that the results weren't closer. But then again, they may have been. Iran didn't allow outside observers, and there were many stories of voter intimidation and election thuggery in the days leading up to the election. We'll have to wait and see....but I don't think there's going to be any real change coming just yet.

Iran tense in wake of election


TEHRAN, Iran—Iran's government says incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the winner of the election with a landslide 62.63 percent of the vote. Top opposition contender Mir Hossein Mousavi takes only 33.75 percent of vote in a result disputed by his supporters.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Anti-riot police guarded the offices overseeing Iran's disputed elections Saturday with the count pointing to a landslide victory by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad while his opponent denounced the results as "treason" and threatened a challenge.

The standoff left Tehran in tense anticipation. Many people opened shops and carried out errands, but the backdrop was far from normal: black-clad police gathering around key government buildings and mobile phone text messaging blocked in an apparent attempt to stifle one of the main communication tools of the pro-reform movement of Mir Hossein Mousavi.

A statement from Mousavi posted on his Web site urged his supporters to resist a "governance of lie and dictatorship."

Outside the Interior Ministry, which directed Friday's voting, security forces set up a cordon. The results had flowed quickly after polls closed showing the hard-line president with a comfortable lead -- defying expectations of a nail-biter showdown following a month of fierce campaigning and bringing immediate charges of vote rigging by Mousavi.

But an expected announcement on the full outcome was temporarily put on hold. A reason for the delay was not made public, but it suggested intervention by Iran's Islamic authorities seeking to put the brakes on a potentially volatile showdown.

Ahmadinejad had the apparent backing of the ruling theocracy, which holds near-total power and would have the ability to put the election results on the slow track.

There were no immediate reports of serious clashes or mass protests, and the next step by Mousavi's backers were unclear. Mousavi, who became the hero of a powerful youth-driven movement, had not made a public address or issued messages since declaring himself the true victor moments after polls closed and accusing authorities of "manipulating" the vote.


Continue reading...

6 comments (Latest Comment: 06/13/2009 22:38:00 by Mondobubba)

Hope, Change, The Five Pillars?
Author: clintster    Date: 06/12/2009 10:51:53

Change. A beautiful little word that has caused a great deal of discussion in the past year or so. What is change? Is it the exclusive property of one party or political philosophy? Is it possible for change to come overnight? Is change even possible in other countries? Today we may find out.
Continue reading...

105 comments (Latest Comment: 06/13/2009 03:57:19 by Mondobubba)

Shocked? They STILL aren't.
Author: Raine    Date: 06/11/2009 12:38:51

Two Months ago everyone was up in arms because a DHS Report said that law enforcement in America needed to be more acutely aware of right wing extremism in America. Specifically, the report mentioned anti-semites, lone wolves, white supremacists, etc. The conservatives in America were apoplectic. What happened as a result? DHS aquiessed to the outrage. They apologized, and - on the outset - appeared to alter the leaked report.

That said - for the second time in 2 weeks we find that the damn report was correct. This time it was a white supremacist hate-filled racist who murdered Stephen Tyrone Johns, a security Guard at the Holocaust Museum.
Continue reading...

140 comments (Latest Comment: 06/12/2009 02:19:36 by clintster)

HELP is on the way...
Author: BobR    Date: 06/10/2009 12:30:29

For a long time now, healthcare has been a big problem in the United States. We are the only industrialized nation that still does not provide public coverage for its citizens. We tried back in 1993, but the attempt was bungled so badly that it has not been seriously considered since. Now that we once again have a Congress and White House in Democratic hands, it's time to try again, and - hopefully - get it right this time.

Yesterday, the House Democrats released the first draft of the Healthcare reform bill:
House Democratic leaders gave members their first glimpse of their version of President Obama’s healthcare overhaul on Tuesday, with liberals leaving the meeting happy and centrist Democrats walking away skeptical.

The outline put forth lacked many of the details that will decide the fate of the overhaul — notably, how the proposal would be paid for. But it made good on the commitment Obama and Democratic leaders made to include a government-run "public option."

A public option for healthcare insurance is essential for liberals in the caucus. Blue Dogs and New Democrats got less of what they wanted. Most notably, the plan ignores Blue Dogs' call for a government plan to be a "fallback option," if reform of private healthcare doesn’t work.

The article refers to it as the HELP bill, which shows that Dems are finally getting wise to the game of properly naming things. Then again - it may just be named that because it came from the HELP committee.

Naturally, the Republicans (and some conservative Democrats) are against it:
Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) took to the House floor on Tuesday to question the public plan being advocated by Democrats.

"The forthcoming plan from Democratic leaders will make healthcare more expensive, limit treatments, ration care and put bureaucrats in charge of medical decisions rather than patients and doctors," he said. "That amounts to a government takeover of healthcare, and it will hurt, rather than help, middle-class families across our country."

Some Democrats also have reservations.

As noted in a first-person essay by a Canadian, these are the same myths that they propagate about the Canadian system, and are easily debunked, if people would simply pay attention.

  1. Expense: The biggest waste of money in the healthcare system today is the private insurance middleman. Bad investments, high CEO pay, and the need to maintain a profit add costs that would be removed with a government-run "insurance" program. It would also eliminate the need for the uninsured to use emergency rooms for routine healthcare.

  2. Limit treatments: I've never heard a clear explanation of how this would be the case. It would actually increase treatments, because you wouldn't have some private insurance bean-counter saying "no, we're not going to pay for that".

  3. Ration care: ditto.

  4. Put bureaucrats in charge of medical decisions rather than patients and doctors: This is the biggest joke of all for anyone who has medical insurance. Insurance companies put out lists of procedures that they will and won't cover, and how much (Chiropractic? not covered. Mental Health? 20 visits per year max). A properly created public option insurance coverage would remove those limits. You'd actually get the middleman OUT of the medical decision process, and put it back where it belongs - with the patients and the doctors.
(there are other debunked myths at the link...)

The one remaining sticking point is "how would it be paid for?", and the answer is the one no one wants to say out loud: raise taxes. However, this could be offset in two ways. First, people that choose the public option would no longer be paying for their share of public insurance out of their paychecks (does any company pay 100% of the premiums anymore?). Some companies may choose to remove medical insurance coverage from their benefits packages completely, and pass the savings on to their employees, which would also offset the tax increase.

The second option could be to offer a tax credit to those that don't want a "bureaucrat making their medical decisions", and would rather go with a private insurance option. To get the credit, they would have to provide proof of coverage with a private provider.

Of course - I am not a legislator, and there is no telling what we'll end up with once the Republicans and conservaDems get their stank all over the bill. I just hope it doesn't get compromised to the point that it's destined to fail upon implementation and make the doom-and-gloom prognosticator's warnings come true.

 
82 comments (Latest Comment: 06/11/2009 00:36:19 by Mondobubba)

Ask a Vet
Author: TriSec    Date: 06/09/2009 10:52:30

Good Morning.

Today is our 2,247th day in Iraq.

We'll start this morning as we always do, with the latest casualty figures from Iraq and Afghanistan, courtesy of Antiwar.com:

American Deaths
Since war began (3/19/03): 4311 3455
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03): 4172
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): 3850
Since Handover (6/29/04): 3452
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): 83

Other Coalition Troops - Iraq: 318
US Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 700
Other Military Deaths - Afghanistan: 474
Journalists - Iraq: 138
Contractor Employee Deaths - Iraq: 1,306

We find this morning's cost of war passing through:

$ 866, 221, 800, 000. 00


Remember "Stop-Loss"? It's the Pentagon's practice of recalling discharged service members back to active service for a second, third, or fourth tour of duty overseas. Essentially, it's a back-door draft for citizens that have already fulfilled their obligations to Uncle Sam.

A few years ago, there was a minor political uproar about it, and the practice was modified a bit. Eventually, the story faded out of the headlines.

This doesn't mean the practice has stopped.

Continue reading...

51 comments (Latest Comment: 06/10/2009 08:52:40 by Scoopster)

Date night outrage.
Author: Raine    Date: 06/08/2009 12:45:17

Another Monday, another round of scandal. FAUX News literally has been complaining about the President's trip to France. They have seemingly forgotten the speeches in Cairo, Buchenwald, and Omaha Beach -- all done to help repair our image to the rest of the world. Instead, they are complaining about the President and the night he spent with his wife on the tax payer dollar. How DARE he spend American Money? How dare he vacation? The nerve!
Continue reading...

62 comments (Latest Comment: 06/09/2009 02:57:20 by livingonli)

Ship of Fools
Author: velveeta jones    Date: 06/07/2009 13:37:30

"My mind it being much inclined to cross the raging main,
I left my tender parents in sorrow, grief and pain.
On board the "Fame" we then became all passengers to be,
To sail with Captain Thompson to the Land of Libertie".

La la la lalala la laaaaa.

Good morning dear readers! Oh, how excited am I to be packing for the cruise of the Century with Karl Rove, former U.N. hater John Bolton, prostitute toe-sucker Dick Morris and the cream of the crop - or, is that crop of the cream - from the overly conservative National Review — Rich Lowry, Jonah Goldberg, Kathryn Lopez, Kate O’Beirne and others.
Continue reading...

14 comments (Latest Comment: 06/08/2009 06:00:45 by livingonli)

Greetings from Tralfamadore!
Author: TriSec    Date: 06/06/2009 11:26:31

Listen:
Billy Pilgrim has come unstuck in time.

With those words, one of the more interesting novels of the late 20th century begins. Poor Mr. Pilgrim....traveling back and forth through time, re-living bits of his life over and over whether he wants to or not.

At least he gets to settle down with a porn star. Lucky guy.

Of course, this is Kurt Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five". I read it once in the 80s, not very long after catching the movie of the same name on a local TV channel. I eventually forgot about it and lost the book in my cellar. So it goes.

I used to belong to the book of the month club. Every other month, they'd send me religious texts or crime novels, and every other month, I'd send them back. I finally got tired of playing this game and cancelled. The last book they sent me was a small volume featuring three by Mr Vonnegut; Cat's Cradle, Slaughterhouse Five, and Breakfast of Champions.

I kept it.

Tralfamadorians have an interesting concept of time. We Humans have been accused by many different races throughout science fiction of being "so linear". There's no exception here. For all of us, we're born, we become aware, some of us marry and make copies of ourselves, but then we all get feeble and die.

I don't know when it's going to happen for me. I'm hoping to make it to the 100th anniversary of V-E day, September 1, 2045. I'll be 79 then....seems like a good age to me. The Tralfamadorians already know when I'm going to die. With my luck, I'll be hit by a bus riding my bike to work next week. So it goes.

One thing I took away from the novel was that nobody ever dies in this timeline. We all exist in a multitude of uncounted moments in time, and the savvy time-traveler can revisit them again and again. Two weeks ago, I was sitting on my mother's back porch and we were talking about grandpa. He stopped existing in this timeline 16 years ago this week (June, 1993). But we got a good chuckle...sitting and remembering his escapades with a couple of cherished family friends and Kane's Donuts. We all went back in time that afternoon, and grandpa was sitting right there laughing about it with us.

***

I'm betting some among you were expecting a blog about war today. At this hour, 65 years ago, Americans on the East Coast were waking up to the news that Europe had been invaded. Our President is standing on the beach again this morning, with a bunch of old men. We tell them they did heroic things, but only because we won. A long time ago, they were scared, seasick, and cold. Our guys went ashore and killed a bunch of the other guys that were also scared, hungry and cold. So it goes.

There's two other novels in the volume I'm reading. "Cat's Cradle" is an interesting little thing about a chemical that can turn all the water on earth into a solid. A dictator in the Caribbean commits suicide with it, then it falls into the sea. "Polywater" was all the rage in the 1960s; there was even a Star Trek episode about it before the theory was debunked.

But...as long as there are men, there are men searching for ways to destroy the planet. We have nukes today, but what will man have tomorrow? Of course, if we keep going on the way we're going, we'll destroy the world just fine without any more interesting weapons.

***

I've just started reading "Breakfast of Champions". A passage a few pages in grabbed my attention. "In some places people would actually try to eat mud or such on gravel while babies were being born just a few feet away..." I blinked, then I had to look up when the novel was written. (1973). I remember something I read about maybe six months ago. Half of a little island in the Caribbean is so poor, the people there are being forced to eat dirt just to stay alive. It's the western part of Hispanola.

One of the themes I've already found in this book is that Mr. Vonnegut seems obsessed with a certain disease. "Little corkscrews" that worm their way into the human body and eat your brain. You get them by having intercourse with questionable women. If you don't treat it, you go nuts. Maybe this is what happened to the entire Bush administration.

Poor President Bush. I hope he ends up unstuck in time like Billy Pilgrim. Then he can go back and forth and experience his sorry life over and over again. I wonder where he'd go? Would he go back to the day he went AWOL? Would he sit in a schoolroom and read "The Pet Goat" again and again and again while the world explodes?

Or would he go back to New Orleans and tell everyone that there's a lot of stuff here while doing nothing and listening to the birds asking him:

Poo-tee-weet?


 
10 comments (Latest Comment: 06/07/2009 04:21:55 by BobR)

<<  542  543  544  545  546  547  >>
Order by most recent comment   Complete Blog Entry List